School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK.
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Oct 7;278(1720):2874-80. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2678. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
The extent to which the transition to agriculture in Europe was the result of biological (demic) diffusion from the Near East or the adoption of farming practices by indigenous hunter-gatherers is subject to continuing debate. Thus far, archaeological study and the analysis of modern and ancient European DNA have yielded inconclusive results regarding these hypotheses. Here we test these ideas using an extensive craniometric dataset representing 30 hunter-gatherer and farming populations. Pairwise population craniometric distance was compared with temporally controlled geographical models representing evolutionary hypotheses of biological and cultural transmission. The results show that, following the physical dispersal of Near Eastern/Anatolian farmers into central Europe, two biological lineages were established with limited gene flow between them. Farming communities spread across Europe, while hunter-gatherer communities located in outlying geographical regions adopted some cultural elements from the farmers. Therefore, the transition to farming in Europe did not involve the complete replacement of indigenous hunter-gatherer populations despite significant gene flow from the Southwest Asia. This study suggests that a mosaic process of dispersal of farmers and their ideas was operating in outlying regions of Europe, thereby reconciling previously conflicting results obtained from genetic and archaeological studies.
欧洲向农业的转变在多大程度上是由于来自近东的生物(疫病)扩散,或者是由于本地狩猎采集者采用了农业实践,这一直是一个持续存在的争论点。到目前为止,考古研究和对现代和古代欧洲 DNA 的分析对于这些假设尚未得出明确的结论。在这里,我们使用代表 30 个狩猎采集者和农业人群的广泛颅面计量学数据集来检验这些想法。我们比较了成对的人口颅面计量距离与代表生物和文化传播进化假说的时间控制地理模型。结果表明,在来自近东/安纳托利亚的农民向中欧的物理扩散之后,建立了两个具有有限基因流的生物谱系。农业社区在整个欧洲传播,而位于偏远地理区域的狩猎采集者社区则从农民那里采用了一些文化元素。因此,尽管来自西南亚的基因流动显著,但欧洲向农业的转变并没有涉及到本地狩猎采集者人口的完全取代。本研究表明,农民及其思想的分散马赛克过程在欧洲的偏远地区运作,从而调和了以前从遗传和考古研究中获得的相互冲突的结果。