Bouder Frederic
Maastricht University, Department of Technology and Society Studies, Grote Gracht 76, 6211 SZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Curr Drug Saf. 2015;10(1):9-15. doi: 10.2174/157488631001150407103916.
Highly publicised vaccine scares and recent debates about the risks suggest that public trust in immunisation programmes is fragile. For instance, the recent outbreak of Measles in Wales was the direct result of almost fifteen years of distrust for the MMR vaccine in the UK. This article shows how the latest science on risk communication will help critical actors, especially policy-makers, to build trust when they communicate risks to citizens and patients. The article offers policy advice on risk communication based on the results of three vaccines case studies. Five procedural principles which were developed for the UK government - the so-called "five As" of public risk communication are used to structure the discussion. Conclusions and recommendations suggest ways to move forward and build a two-way proactive risk communication practice.
备受关注的疫苗恐慌以及近期关于风险的辩论表明,公众对免疫计划的信任很脆弱。例如,威尔士近期爆发的麻疹疫情就是英国近十五年对麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹联合疫苗(MMR疫苗)不信任的直接后果。本文展示了风险沟通的最新科学如何帮助关键行为者,特别是政策制定者,在向公民和患者传达风险时建立信任。本文基于三个疫苗案例研究的结果,提供了关于风险沟通的政策建议。为英国政府制定的五条程序原则——即公共风险沟通的所谓“五个A”——被用于构建讨论。结论和建议提出了前进的方向以及建立双向主动风险沟通实践的方法。