Esophageal mucosal resection versus esophagectomy: a comparative study of surgical results in patients with advanced megaesophagus.

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of advanced megaesophagus has no consensus, being esophagectomy the more commonly used method. Since it has high morbimortality--inconvenient for benign disease -, in recent years an alternative has been introduced: the esophageal mucosal resection.

AIM

To compare early and late results of the two techniques evaluating the operative time, length of ICU stay; postoperative hospitalization; total hospitalization; intra- and postoperative complication rates; mortality; and long-term results.

METHODS

Were evaluated retrospectively 40 charts, 23 esophagectomies and 17 mucosectomies. In assessing postoperative results, interviews were conducted by using a specific questionnaire.

RESULTS

Comparing the means of esophagectomy and mucosal resection, respectively, the data were: 1) surgical time--310.2 min and 279.7 min (p > 0.05); 2) length of stay in ICU--5 days and 2.53 days (p <0.05); 3) total time of hospitalization--24.25 days and 20.76 days (p> 0.05); 4) length of hospital stay after surgery--19.05 days and 14.94 days (p> 0.05); 5) presence of intraoperative complications--65% and 18% (p <0.05); 6) the presence of postoperative complications - 65% and 35% (p> 0.05). In the assessment of late postoperative score (range 0-10) esophagectomy (n = 5) obtained 8.8 points and 8.8 points also got mucosal resection (n = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal mucosal resection proved to be good alternative for surgical treatment of megaesophagus. It was advantageous in the immediate postoperative period by presenting a lower average time in operation, the total hospitalization, ICU staying and complications rate. In the late postoperative period, the result was excellent and good in both operations.