• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊自付费用对健康维护组织医疗服务利用的影响。

The effect of office visit copayments on utilization in a health maintenance organization.

作者信息

Cherkin D C, Grothaus L, Wagner E H

机构信息

Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Med Care. 1989 Nov;27(11):1036-45. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198911000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198911000-00005
PMID:2586186
Abstract

This study estimated the impact of a $5 copayment on office visit rates in a health maintenance organization. A quasi-experimental design was used to compare the observed changes in visit rates by state government enrollees between the year before copayments and their first year of copayments with changes between the same time periods for a control group of enrollees without copayments. Visit data for 30,415 state enrollees and 21,633 federal enrollees who were enrolled continuously for at least 12 months before and after the start of copayments were obtained from automated data systems. The introduction of a $5 copayment for office visits resulted in an estimated 10.9% decrease in primary care visits (95% confidence interval (CI): -13.4% to -8.4%) and a 3.3% drop in specialty care visits (95% CI: -15.6% to +9.0%). The effect of copayments on primary care visits by enrollees under 40 years of age was twice as large for females as for males. Copayments also had a significantly greater impact on enrollees who were high users (greater than ten primary care visits) during the year before copayments. The copayment effect was immediate and did not diminish over the 12-month study period.

摘要

本研究评估了5美元自付费用对健康维护组织门诊就诊率的影响。采用准实验设计,比较了参保州政府医保的人群在实施自付费用政策前一年和自付费用第一年门诊就诊率的实际变化,以及未实施自付费用政策的参保对照组在相同时间段内的变化。从自动化数据系统获取了30415名参保州政府医保的人群和21633名参保联邦医保的人群的就诊数据,这些人群在自付费用政策实施前后至少连续参保12个月。门诊就诊收取5美元自付费用后,初级保健就诊次数估计减少了10.9%(95%置信区间(CI):-13.4%至-8.4%),专科护理就诊次数下降了3.3%(95%CI:-15.6%至+9.0%)。40岁以下参保人群中,女性因自付费用政策导致的初级保健就诊次数减少幅度是男性的两倍。自付费用政策对自付费用实施前一年门诊就诊次数较多(超过10次初级保健就诊)的参保人群影响也显著更大。自付费用政策的影响立竿见影,且在为期12个月的研究期间并未减弱。

相似文献

1
The effect of office visit copayments on utilization in a health maintenance organization.门诊自付费用对健康维护组织医疗服务利用的影响。
Med Care. 1989 Nov;27(11):1036-45. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198911000-00005.
2
The effect of office visit copayments on preventive care services in an HMO.
Inquiry. 1990 Spring;27(1):24-38.
3
Relationship of the use and costs of physician office visits and prescription drugs to travel distance and increases in member cost share.医生门诊就诊及处方药的使用和费用与出行距离及会员费用分担增加之间的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Oct;12(8):665-76. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.8.665.
4
Impact of visit copayments on outpatient mental health utilization by members of a health maintenance organization.就诊自付费用对健康维护组织成员门诊心理健康服务利用的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;153(3):331-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.3.331.
5
Is magnitude of co-payment effect related to income? Using census data for health services research.自付费用效应的大小与收入有关吗?利用人口普查数据进行卫生服务研究。
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Jan;34(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90064-w.
6
Absence of association between insurance copayments and delays in seeking emergency care among patients with myocardial infarction.心肌梗死患者的保险自付费用与寻求急诊治疗延迟之间不存在关联。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 12;336(24):1722-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199706123362406.
7
Office visit copayments: patient knowledge, response, and communication with providers.门诊自付费用:患者的认知、反应及与医疗服务提供者的沟通。
Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):403-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815c3192.
8
Association of copayments with healthcare utilization and expenditures among Medicaid enrollees with a substance use disorder.患有物质使用障碍的医疗补助参保者中自付费用与医疗保健利用及支出的关联。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jun;161:209314. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209314. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
9
Cost-sharing for emergency care and unfavorable clinical events: findings from the safety and financial ramifications of ED copayments study.急诊护理和不良临床事件的费用分担:急诊共付费用研究的安全性和财务影响结果
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1801-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00562.x.
10
Increased ambulatory care copayments and hospitalizations among the elderly.老年人的门诊医疗自付额增加和住院率增加。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0904533.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Cost Sharing on Utilization of General Physician Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey from Shiraz, Iran.费用分担对全科医生医疗服务利用的影响:来自伊朗设拉子的横断面调查
Int J Prev Med. 2018 Nov 5;9:96. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_133_16. eCollection 2018.
2
Physicians' balance billing, supplemental insurance and access to health care.医生的差额收费、补充保险与医疗服务可及性
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Jun;15(2):269-280. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9162-4. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
3
The effect of cost-sharing in private health insurance on the utilization of health care services between private insurance purchasers and non-purchasers: a study of the Korean health panel survey (2008-2012).
私人医疗保险中的费用分担对私人保险购买者和非购买者之间医疗服务利用的影响:基于韩国健康面板调查(2008 - 2012年)的研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 28;15:489. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1153-0.
4
Household Health Costs: Direct, Indirect and Intangible.家庭健康成本:直接、间接和无形的。
Iran J Public Health. 2014 Feb;43(2):202-9.
5
Cost-sharing, physician utilization, and adverse selection among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic health conditions.患有慢性健康状况的医疗保险受益人中的费用分担、医生利用情况及逆向选择。
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Feb;72(1):49-70. doi: 10.1177/1077558714563169. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
6
Prevention under the Affordable Care Act (ACA): has the ACA overpromised and under delivered?: Comment on "Interrelation of preventive care benefits and shared costs under the Affordable Care Act (ACA)".平价医疗法案(ACA)下的预防措施:ACA 是否夸夸其谈而落实不足?:评论“平价医疗法案(ACA)下的预防保健福利和共同费用的相互关系”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Aug 27;3(3):155-6. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.79. eCollection 2014 Aug.
7
The influence of deductible health plans on receipt of the human papillomavirus vaccine series.可扣除健康计划对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗系列接种情况的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Mar;54(3):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.001.
8
Two-year trends in cancer screening among low socioeconomic status women in an HMO-based high-deductible health plan.基于 HMO 的高免赔额健康计划中,社会经济地位较低的女性癌症筛查的两年趋势。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Sep;27(9):1112-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2057-x. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
9
Does medication adherence following a copayment increase differ by disease burden?药物依从性在共付额增加后是否因疾病负担而异?
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1963-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01286.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
10
Confidence in receiving medical care when seriously ill: a seven-country comparison of the impact of cost barriers.重病就医信心:成本障碍影响的七国比较
Health Expect. 2012 Jun;15(2):212-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00677.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.