• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does medication adherence following a copayment increase differ by disease burden?药物依从性在共付额增加后是否因疾病负担而异?
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1963-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01286.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
2
Increasing copayments and adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemic medications.增加共付额与糖尿病、高血压和高脂血症药物的依从性。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan 1;16(1):e20-34.
3
Does the association between prescription copayment increases and medication adherence differ by race?处方自付费用增加与药物依从性之间的关联是否因种族而异?
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013 Aug;24(3):1317-30. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0152.
4
Effect of a medication copayment increase in veterans with schizophrenia.增加药物自付费用对退伍军人精神分裂症患者的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):335-46.
5
Impact of primary care intensive management on medication adherence and adjustments.基层医疗强化管理对药物依从性和调整的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Aug 1;26(8):e239-e245. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.44073.
6
Effect of increased copayments on pharmacy use in the Department of Veterans Affairs.增加自付费用对退伍军人事务部药房使用情况的影响。
Med Care. 2007 Nov;45(11):1090-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180ca95be.
7
Impact of a prescription copayment increase on lipid-lowering medication adherence in veterans.处方自付费用增加对退伍军人降脂药物依从性的影响。
Circulation. 2009 Jan 27;119(3):390-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.783944. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
8
Impact of Medicaid prescription copayments on use of antipsychotics and other medications in patients with schizophrenia.医疗补助处方药共付额对精神分裂症患者抗精神病药和其他药物使用的影响。
J Med Econ. 2017 Dec;20(12):1252-1260. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1365720. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
9
Health Outcome Changes in Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes After a State-Level Insulin Copayment Cap.州级胰岛素共付额上限对 1 型糖尿病患者健康结局的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425280. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25280.
10
The Impact of Dual Health Care System Use for Obtaining Prescription Medications on Nonadherence in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes.双重医疗保健系统用于获取处方药物对 2 型糖尿病退伍军人用药依从性的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Jul;53(7):675-682. doi: 10.1177/1060028019828681. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Financial Incentives as a Tool to Increase Medication Adherence for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估经济激励措施作为提高2型糖尿病患者药物依从性的工具:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Mar;16(3):527-545. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01694-y. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
Impact of list price changes on out-of-pocket costs and adherence in four high-rebate specialty drugs.四种高回扣专科药物的标价变化对自付费用和依从性的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):e0280570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280570. eCollection 2023.
3
Association Between Copayment Amount and Filling of Medications for Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure.抗血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂的费用分担额与心力衰竭患者药物填充之间的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e027662. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027662. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Cost Analysis on Total Cost Incurred (Including Out-of-pocket Expenditure and Social Cost) During Palliative Care in Cases of Head-and-Neck Cancer at a Government Regional Cancer Centre in North India.印度北部一家政府区域癌症中心对头颈部癌姑息治疗期间产生的总成本(包括自付费用和社会成本)的成本分析。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2022 Oct-Dec;28(4):419-427. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_23_2022. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
The Effect of Zero Copayments on Medication Adherence in a Community Pharmacy Setting.零自付费用对社区药房环境中药物依从性的影响。
Innov Pharm. 2019 Aug 31;10(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i2.1633. eCollection 2019.
6
Co-payment for Unfunded Additional Care in Publicly Funded Healthcare Systems: Ethical Issues.公共资助医疗体系中自费额外护理的共付额:伦理问题。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Dec;16(4):515-524. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09924-2. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
7
The distributive fairness of out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in the Russian Federation.俄罗斯联邦自费医疗支出的分配公平性。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2020 Mar;20(1):13-40. doi: 10.1007/s10754-019-09268-9. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
8
Improving adherence to high-value medications through prescription cost-sharing policies.通过处方费用分摊政策提高对高价值药物的依从性。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Nov;27(11):868-870. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007916. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
9
Effect of Medicaid Policy Changes on Medication Adherence: Differences by Baseline Adherence.医疗补助政策变化对药物依从性的影响:基于基线依从性的差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):337-345. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.337.
10
High Out-of-Pocket Medical Spending among the Poor and Elderly in Nine Developed Countries.九个发达国家中贫困群体和老年群体的高额自付医疗费用
Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug;51(4):1467-88. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12444. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Cost-Sharing and Hospitalization Offsets in the Elderly.老年人的患者自付费用和住院抵消。
Am Econ Rev. 2010 Mar 1;100(1):193-213. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.1.193.
2
Copayment reductions generate greater medication adherence in targeted patients.自付额降低可提高目标患者的药物依从性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Nov;29(11):2002-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0571.
3
Does prescription drug adherence reduce hospitalizations and costs? The case of diabetes.处方药依从性能否降低住院率和成本?以糖尿病为例。
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2010;22:151-73. doi: 10.1108/s0731-2199(2010)0000022010.
4
In the clinic. Type 2 diabetes.在诊所。2 型糖尿病。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 2;152(5):ITC31-15; quiz ITC316. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-5-201003020-01003.
5
Increased ambulatory care copayments and hospitalizations among the elderly.老年人的门诊医疗自付额增加和住院率增加。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0904533.
6
Hospitalizations and deaths among adults with cardiovascular disease who underuse medications because of cost: a longitudinal analysis.因费用问题而未使用药物的心血管疾病成年患者的住院和死亡情况:一项纵向分析。
Med Care. 2010 Feb;48(2):87-94. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c12e53.
7
Increasing copayments and adherence to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemic medications.增加共付额与糖尿病、高血压和高脂血症药物的依从性。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan 1;16(1):e20-34.
8
Predictors of medication nonadherence among patients with diabetes in Medicare Part D programs: a retrospective cohort study.医疗保险处方药计划中糖尿病患者药物不依从的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2178-88; discussion 2150-1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.002.
9
Vascular risk factor awareness before and pharmacological treatment before and after stroke and TIA.中风和短暂性脑缺血发作前后的血管危险因素知晓情况以及药物治疗情况。
Eur J Neurol. 2009 Jun;16(6):678-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02562.x. Epub 2009 Feb 19.
10
Impact of a prescription copayment increase on lipid-lowering medication adherence in veterans.处方自付费用增加对退伍军人降脂药物依从性的影响。
Circulation. 2009 Jan 27;119(3):390-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.783944. Epub 2009 Jan 12.

药物依从性在共付额增加后是否因疾病负担而异?

Does medication adherence following a copayment increase differ by disease burden?

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1963-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01286.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01286.x
PMID:21689097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3393028/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare changes in medication adherence between patients with high- or low-comorbidity burden after a copayment increase.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study at four Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers by comparing veterans with hypertension or diabetes required to pay copayments with propensity score-matched veterans exempt from copayments. Disease cohorts were stratified by Diagnostic Cost Group risk score: low- (<1) and high-comorbidity (>1) burden. Medication adherence from February 2001 to December 2003, constructed from VA pharmacy claims data based on the ReComp algorithm, were assessed using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Veterans with lower comorbidity were more responsive to a U.S.$5 copayment increase than higher comorbidity veterans. In the lower comorbidity groups, veterans with diabetes had a greater reduction in adherence than veterans with hypertension. Adherence trends were similar for copayment-exempt and nonexempt veterans with higher comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

Medication copayment increases are associated with different impacts for low- and high-risk patients. High-risk patients incur greater out-of-pocket costs from continued adherence, while low-risk patients put themselves at increased risk for adverse health events due to greater nonadherence.

摘要

目的

比较共付额增加后高或低合并症负担患者的药物治疗依从性变化。

方法

我们在四个退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,通过比较需要支付共付额的高血压或糖尿病退伍军人与无需支付共付额的倾向评分匹配退伍军人,比较共付额增加后高或低合并症负担患者的药物治疗依从性变化。疾病队列根据诊断成本组风险评分分层:低(<1)和高(>1)合并症负担。使用广义估计方程,根据 ReComp 算法从 VA 药房索赔数据中构建 2001 年 2 月至 2003 年 12 月的药物治疗依从性。

结果

与高合并症退伍军人相比,低合并症退伍军人对 5 美元的共付额增加更敏感。在低合并症组中,糖尿病退伍军人的依从性下降幅度大于高血压退伍军人。对于高合并症的共付豁免和非豁免退伍军人,依从性趋势相似。

结论

药物共付额增加对低风险和高风险患者的影响不同。高风险患者由于继续用药而产生更多的自付费用,而低风险患者由于不依从而增加不良健康事件的风险。