• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颞下颌关节能量密度的诊断组差异。

Diagnostic group differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities.

作者信息

Gallo L M, Iwasaki L R, Gonzalez Y M, Liu H, Marx D B, Nickel J C

机构信息

Center of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Masticatory Disorders, Removable Prosthodontics, Geriatric and Special Care Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Apr;18 Suppl 1(0 1):164-9. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12074.

DOI:10.1111/ocr.12074
PMID:25865545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4396680/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cartilage fatigue, due to mechanical work, may account for precocious development of degenerative joint disease in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). This study compared energy densities (mJ/mm³) in TMJs of three diagnostic groups.

SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION

Sixty-eight subjects (44 women, 24 men) gave informed consent. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) and imaging were used to group subjects according to presence of jaw muscle or joint pain (+P) and bilateral disk displacement (+DD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Subjects (+P+DD, n=16; -P+DD, n=16; and -P-DD, n=36) provided cone-beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance images, and jaw-tracking data. Numerical modeling was used to determine TMJ loads (Fnormal). Dynamic stereometry was used to characterize individual-specific data of stress-field dynamics during 10 symmetrical jaw-closing cycles. These data were used to estimate tractional forces (Ftraction). Energy densities were then calculated as W/Q (W=work done or mechanical energy input=tractional force×distance of stress-field translation, Q=volume of cartilage). anova and Tukey-Kramer post hoc analyses tested for intergroup differences.

RESULTS

Mean±standard error energy density for the +P+DD group was 12.7±1.5 mJ/mm³ and significantly greater (all adjusted p<0.04) when compared to -P+DD (7.4±1.4 mJ/mm³) and -P-DD (5.8±0.9 mJ/mm³) groups. Energy densities in -P+DD and -P-DD groups were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic group differences in energy densities suggest that mechanical work may be a unique mechanism, which contributes to cartilage fatigue in subjects with pain and disk displacement.

摘要

目的

由于机械作用导致的软骨疲劳可能是颞下颌关节(TMJ)退行性关节疾病早熟发展的原因。本研究比较了三个诊断组颞下颌关节中的能量密度(mJ/mm³)。

设置与样本人群

68名受试者(44名女性,24名男性)签署了知情同意书。根据颞下颌关节紊乱病(DC/TMD)诊断标准及影像学检查,依据是否存在颌面部肌肉或关节疼痛(+P)以及双侧盘状移位(+DD)对受试者进行分组。

材料与方法

受试者(+P+DD组,n = 16;-P+DD组,n = 16;-P-DD组,n = 36)提供了锥形束计算机断层扫描和磁共振图像以及颌骨运动跟踪数据。采用数值建模来确定颞下颌关节负荷(法向力F)。运用动态立体测量法来表征10个对称闭口周期中应力场动力学的个体特异性数据。这些数据用于估计牵引力(Ftraction)。然后将能量密度计算为W/Q(W = 所做的功或机械能输入 = 牵引力×应力场平移距离,Q = 软骨体积)。采用方差分析和Tukey-Kramer事后检验分析组间差异。

结果

+P+DD组的平均能量密度±标准误为12.7±1.5 mJ/mm³,与-P+DD组(7.4±1.4 mJ/mm³)和-P-DD组(5.8±0.9 mJ/mm³)相比,显著更高(所有校正p < 0.04)。-P+DD组和-P-DD组的能量密度无显著差异。

结论

能量密度的诊断组差异表明,机械作用可能是导致疼痛和盘状移位患者软骨疲劳的一种独特机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0e/4396680/7fc598f89137/nihms659566f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0e/4396680/a2f7541fc1b9/nihms659566f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0e/4396680/cdbe302e7416/nihms659566f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0e/4396680/1cbe0400db56/nihms659566f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0e/4396680/7fc598f89137/nihms659566f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0e/4396680/a2f7541fc1b9/nihms659566f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0e/4396680/cdbe302e7416/nihms659566f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0e/4396680/1cbe0400db56/nihms659566f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0e/4396680/7fc598f89137/nihms659566f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic group differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities.颞下颌关节能量密度的诊断组差异。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Apr;18 Suppl 1(0 1):164-9. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12074.
2
Mechanobehavioral Scores in Women with and without TMJ Disc Displacement.患有和未患有颞下颌关节盘移位的女性的机械行为评分
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(8):895-901. doi: 10.1177/0022034517704375. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
3
TMJ energy densities in healthy men and women.健康男性和女性的颞下颌关节能量密度。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Jun;25(6):846-849. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.027. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
Modeling of muscle forces in humans with and without temporomandibular joint disorders.患有和未患有颞下颌关节紊乱症的人体肌肉力量建模。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Apr;18 Suppl 1(0 1):170-9. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12075.
5
Jaw closing movement and sex differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities.颞下颌关节能量密度的闭口运动及性别差异
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Feb;45(2):97-103. doi: 10.1111/joor.12588. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
A pilot study of ambulatory masticatory muscle activities in temporomandibular joint disorders diagnostic groups.颞下颌关节紊乱诊断组动态咀嚼肌活动的初步研究。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Apr;18 Suppl 1(0 1):146-55. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12085.
7
Static and dynamic mechanics of the temporomandibular joint: plowing forces, joint load and tissue stress.颞下颌关节的静态和动态力学:犁耕力、关节负荷与组织应力。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009 Aug;12(3):159-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01449.x.
8
Temporomandibular joint disorders' impact on pain, function, and disability.颞下颌关节紊乱症对疼痛、功能和残疾的影响。
J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):79S-86S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514565793. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
9
The influence of unilateral disc displacement on stress in the contralateral joint with a normally positioned disc in a human temporomandibular joint: an analytic approach using the finite element method.单侧盘移位对人颞下颌关节中对侧关节(盘位置正常)应力的影响:一种使用有限元方法的分析途径
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;42(8):2018-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
10
Condyle-disk-fossa position and relationship to clinical signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in women.女性颞下颌关节髁突-盘-窝位置及其与颞下颌关节紊乱症临床体征和症状的关系
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Sep;108(3):e117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.04.034.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite element analysis of SED and facial morphology.睡眠呼吸紊乱与面部形态的有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 31;25(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06156-2.
2
Temporomandibular disorders in migraine and tension-type headache patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.偏头痛和紧张型头痛患者的颞下颌关节紊乱症:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2024 Jun;38(2):11-24. doi: 10.22514/jofph.2024.011. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
3
Mechanics- and Behavior-Related Temporomandibular Joint Differences.力学和行为相关的颞下颌关节差异。

本文引用的文献

1
Tractional Forces, Work and Energy Densities in the Human TMJ.人类颞下颌关节中的牵引力、功和能量密度
Craniofac Growth Ser. 2009 Mar;46:427-450.
2
A pilot study of ambulatory masticatory muscle activities in temporomandibular joint disorders diagnostic groups.颞下颌关节紊乱诊断组动态咀嚼肌活动的初步研究。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Apr;18 Suppl 1(0 1):146-55. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12085.
3
Masticatory muscle sleep background electromyographic activity is elevated in myofascial temporomandibular disorder patients.咀嚼肌睡眠时背景肌电图活动在肌筋膜颞下颌关节紊乱病患者中升高。
J Dent Res. 2024 Oct;103(11):1083-1090. doi: 10.1177/00220345241265670. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
4
Mechanisms Underlying Sex Differences in Temporomandibular Disorders and Their Comorbidity with Migraine.颞下颌关节紊乱症性别差异及其与偏头痛共病的潜在机制
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 15;14(7):707. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070707.
5
A theoretical analysis of longitudinal temporomandibular joint compressive stresses and mandibular growth.颞下颌关节纵向压缩应力与下颌生长的理论分析。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):11-17. doi: 10.2319/012921-84.1.
6
Mechanobehavior and mandibular ramus length in different facial phenotypes.不同面型的机械行为与下颌支长度。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Nov 1;90(6):866-872. doi: 10.2319/032420-217.1.
7
MRI characteristics of the asymptomatic temporomandibular joint in patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint disorder.单侧颞下颌关节紊乱症患者无症状颞下颌关节的 MRI 特征。
Oral Radiol. 2021 Jul;37(3):469-475. doi: 10.1007/s11282-020-00483-6. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
8
Three-dimensional temporomandibular joint muscle attachment morphometry and its impacts on musculoskeletal modeling.三维颞下颌关节肌肉附着形态测量及其对肌肉骨骼建模的影响。
J Biomech. 2018 Oct 5;79:119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
9
Jaw closing movement and sex differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities.颞下颌关节能量密度的闭口运动及性别差异
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Feb;45(2):97-103. doi: 10.1111/joor.12588. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
10
Mechanobehavioral Scores in Women with and without TMJ Disc Displacement.患有和未患有颞下颌关节盘移位的女性的机械行为评分
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(8):895-901. doi: 10.1177/0022034517704375. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Dec;40(12):883-91. doi: 10.1111/joor.12112.
4
Shear mechanics of the TMJ disc: relationship to common clinical observations.颞下颌关节盘的剪切力学:与常见临床观察的关系。
J Dent Res. 2013 Feb;92(2):193-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034512468749. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
5
An augmented Lagrangian method for sliding contact of soft tissue.一种用于软组织滑动接触的增广拉格朗日方法。
J Biomech Eng. 2012 Aug;134(8):084503. doi: 10.1115/1.4007177.
6
Muscle organization in individuals with and without pain and joint dysfunction.肌肉组织在有疼痛和关节功能障碍的个体和无疼痛和关节功能障碍的个体中的差异。
J Dent Res. 2012 Jun;91(6):568-73. doi: 10.1177/0022034512445909. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
7
Effect of mechanical loading on electrical conductivity in porcine TMJ discs.机械加载对猪颞下颌关节盘导电性的影响。
J Dent Res. 2011 Oct;90(10):1216-20. doi: 10.1177/0022034511415275. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
8
Temporomandibular joint loads in subjects with and without disc displacement.有和没有盘状移位的受试者的颞下颌关节负荷
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2009;1(2):90-93. doi: 10.4081/or.2009.e29.
9
Anisotropic solute diffusion tensor in porcine TMJ discs measured by FRAP with spatial Fourier analysis.利用 FRAP 技术和空间傅里叶分析测量猪颞下颌关节盘各向异性溶质扩散张量。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Nov;38(11):3398-408. doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-0099-y. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
10
Human temporomandibular joint eminence shape and load minimization.人体颞下颌关节隆起形状和负载最小化。
J Dent Res. 2010 Jul;89(7):722-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034510364492.