Suppr超能文献

健康男性和女性的颞下颌关节能量密度。

TMJ energy densities in healthy men and women.

作者信息

Iwasaki L R, Gonzalez Y M, Liu Y, Liu H, Markova M, Gallo L M, Nickel J C

机构信息

University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, USA; University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry, Department of Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, USA.

University at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine, Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, USA.

出版信息

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Jun;25(6):846-849. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.027. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cartilage fatigue, due to mechanical work, may account for the early development of degenerative joint disease (DJD) in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and why women are three times more likely to be afflicted. This study tested for gender differences in mechanical energy densities in women and men with healthy TMJs.

DESIGN

Eighteen women and eighteen men gave informed consent. Research diagnostic criteria including imaging were used to ensure that subjects' TMJs were normal, without disc displacement or signs of DJD. Numerical modeling determined TMJ loads (F). Jaw tracking and three-dimensional dynamic stereometry characterized individual-specific data of stress-field dynamic mechanics during 10 symmetrical jaw closing cycles. These data were used to estimate tractional forces (F). Energy densities were then calculated, where: Energy Density = W/Q (W = work done or mechanical energy input = F*distance of stress-field translation, Q = volume of cartilage). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and follow-up two-group comparisons tested mean energy densities for ipsilateral and contralateral TMJs in women vs men.

RESULTS

Mean energy densities ± standard deviations in ipsilateral and contralateral TMJs in women were 9.0 ± 9.7 and 8.4 ± 5.5 mJ/mm, respectively, and were significantly larger (P = 0.004 and 0.001, respectively) compared to ipsilateral and contralateral TMJs in men, which were 5.6 ± 4.2 and 6.3 ± 4.2 mJ/mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Energy densities were significantly larger in healthy TMJs of women than men. Larger TMJ energy densities during normal jaw functions could predispose earlier mechanical fatigue of the TMJ disc.

摘要

目的

由于机械功导致的软骨疲劳可能是颞下颌关节(TMJ)退行性关节病(DJD)早期发展的原因,也是女性患病几率是男性三倍的原因。本研究测试了健康颞下颌关节的男性和女性机械能密度的性别差异。

设计

18名女性和18名男性签署了知情同意书。使用包括影像学在内的研究诊断标准,以确保受试者的颞下颌关节正常,无盘移位或DJD迹象。数值建模确定颞下颌关节负荷(F)。颌骨跟踪和三维动态立体测量法表征了10个对称闭口周期中应力场动态力学的个体特异性数据。这些数据用于估计牵引力(F)。然后计算能量密度,其中:能量密度 = W/Q(W = 所做的功或机械能输入 = F×应力场平移距离,Q = 软骨体积)。双向方差分析(ANOVA)和后续两组比较测试了女性与男性同侧和对侧颞下颌关节的平均能量密度。

结果

女性同侧和对侧颞下颌关节的平均能量密度±标准差分别为9.0±9.7和8.4±5.5 mJ/mm,与男性同侧和对侧颞下颌关节相比显著更大(分别为P = 0.004和0.001),男性同侧和对侧颞下颌关节的平均能量密度分别为5.6±4.2和6.3±4.2 mJ/mm。

结论

女性健康颞下颌关节的能量密度显著高于男性。正常颌骨功能期间较大的颞下颌关节能量密度可能使颞下颌关节盘更早出现机械疲劳。

相似文献

1
TMJ energy densities in healthy men and women.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Jun;25(6):846-849. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.027. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
2
Diagnostic group differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Apr;18 Suppl 1(0 1):164-9. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12074.
3
Jaw closing movement and sex differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities.
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Feb;45(2):97-103. doi: 10.1111/joor.12588. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
4
Tractional Forces, Work and Energy Densities in the Human TMJ.
Craniofac Growth Ser. 2009 Mar;46:427-450.
5
Mechanobehavioral Scores in Women with and without TMJ Disc Displacement.
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(8):895-901. doi: 10.1177/0022034517704375. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Dynamic stereometry of the temporomandibular joint.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6 Suppl 1:37-47. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.233.x.
7
Modeling of temporomandibular joint function using MRI and jaw-tracking technologies--mechanics.
Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;180(1):54-68. doi: 10.1159/000086199.
8
Stress-field translation in the healthy human temporomandibular joint.
J Dent Res. 2000 Oct;79(10):1740-6. doi: 10.1177/00220345000790100201.
9
Mechanical work during stress-field translation in the human TMJ.
J Dent Res. 2006 Nov;85(11):1006-10. doi: 10.1177/154405910608501106.
10
Mechanics- and Behavior-Related Temporomandibular Joint Differences.
J Dent Res. 2024 Oct;103(11):1083-1090. doi: 10.1177/00220345241265670. Epub 2024 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Simulation of a Custom-Made Temporomandibular Joint-An Academic View on an Industrial Workflow.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 20;12(5):545. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050545.
2
Mechanics- and Behavior-Related Temporomandibular Joint Differences.
J Dent Res. 2024 Oct;103(11):1083-1090. doi: 10.1177/00220345241265670. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
3
Chemokine Regulation in Temporomandibular Joint Disease: A Comprehensive Review.
Genes (Basel). 2023 Feb 4;14(2):408. doi: 10.3390/genes14020408.
4
Structure-function relationships of TMJ lateral capsule-ligament complex.
J Biomech. 2022 Jan;130:110889. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110889. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
5
Sexual dimorphisms in three-dimensional masticatory muscle attachment morphometry regulates temporomandibular joint mechanics.
J Biomech. 2021 Sep 20;126:110623. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110623. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
6
Fibrocartilage Stem Cells in the Temporomandibular Joint: Insights From Animal and Human Studies.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Apr 27;9:665995. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.665995. eCollection 2021.
7
Craniomandibular Disorders in Pregnant Women: An Epidemiological Survey.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020 Jun 4;5(2):36. doi: 10.3390/jfmk5020036.
8
Estrogen signaling impacts temporomandibular joint and periodontal disease pathology.
Odontology. 2020 Apr;108(2):153-165. doi: 10.1007/s10266-019-00439-1. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
9
Temporomandibular Joint Condyle-Disc Morphometric Sexual Dimorphisms Independent of Skull Scaling.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Nov;77(11):2245-2257. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
Mechanobehavior and Ontogenesis of the Temporomandibular Joint.
J Dent Res. 2018 Oct;97(11):1185-1192. doi: 10.1177/0022034518786469. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

3
Diagnostic group differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 Apr;18 Suppl 1(0 1):164-9. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12074.
5
Shear mechanics of the TMJ disc: relationship to common clinical observations.
J Dent Res. 2013 Feb;92(2):193-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034512468749. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
6
Relationships between disk displacement, joint effusion, and degenerative changes of the TMJ in TMD patients based on MRI findings.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;40(3):283-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
7
Regional cell density distribution and oxygen consumption rates in porcine TMJ discs: an explant study.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jul;19(7):911-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
8
Temporomandibular joint loads in subjects with and without disc displacement.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2009;1(2):90-93. doi: 10.4081/or.2009.e29.
9
Human temporomandibular joint eminence shape and load minimization.
J Dent Res. 2010 Jul;89(7):722-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034510364492.
10
Tractional forces on porcine temporomandibular joint discs.
J Dent Res. 2009 Aug;88(8):736-40. doi: 10.1177/0022034509340161.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验