Oberbaum Menachem, Frass Michael, Gropp Cornelius
The Center for Integrative Complementary Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Internal Medicine I, Outpatient Unit Homeopathy in Malignant Diseases, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Homeopathy. 2015 Apr;104(2):97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
The debate between those who believe homeopathy and hormesis derive from the same root and those who believe the two are different phenomena is as old as hormesis. It is an emotionally loaded discussion, with both sides fielding arguments which are far from scientific. Careful analysis of the basic paradigms of the two systems questions the claim of the homeopaths, who find similarities between them. The authors discuss these paradigms, indicating the differences between the claims of homeopathy and hormesis. It is time for thorough and serious research to lay this question to rest. One possible approach is to compare the activity of a hormetic agent, prepared in the usual way, with that of the same agent in the same concentration prepared homeopathically by serial dilution and succussion.
认为顺势疗法和兴奋效应源自同一根源的人与认为二者是不同现象的人之间的争论,几乎与兴奋效应的历史一样悠久。这是一场充满情绪化的讨论,双方都提出了远非科学的论据。对这两种体系的基本范式进行仔细分析,会对顺势疗法从业者认为二者存在相似性的说法提出质疑。作者们讨论了这些范式,指出了顺势疗法和兴奋效应主张之间的差异。现在是时候进行全面而认真的研究来解决这个问题了。一种可能的方法是比较以常规方式制备的兴奋效应剂的活性,与通过系列稀释和振荡以顺势疗法制备的相同浓度的同一制剂的活性。