Suppr超能文献

对痴呆症患者家庭照料者代理决策的障碍、促进因素及干预措施的系统评价。

A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to and interventions for proxy decision-making by family carers of people with dementia.

作者信息

Lord Kathryn, Livingston Gill, Cooper Claudia

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry,University College London (UCL),63-73 Riding House Street,W1W 7EJ London,UK.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Aug;27(8):1301-12. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215000411. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Relatives of people with dementia report that proxy decision-making is difficult and distressing. We systematically reviewed the literature about barriers and facilitators to family carers of people with dementia making proxy decisions, and interventions used to facilitate their decision-making.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases and references of included papers up to February 2014. Two authors independently evaluated study quality using a checklist.

RESULTS

We included the 30/104 papers from our search which fitted predetermined criteria and prioritized higher quality papers. Family carers report that proxy decision-making is challenging and can be distressing, especially when decisions are made against the wishes of the care recipient and support from healthcare professionals is lacking. Decision-specific manualized aids have been developed, and while results for those supporting decisions about respite and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding have shown promising results in pilot trials, no intervention has yet been shown to significantly reduce decisional conflict or carer burden, or increase knowledge in randomized controlled trials; a decision aid for advance care planning increased decisional conflict.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend development and testing of decision aids targeting the decisions carers report finding most distressing, including those around where people should live, accessing services, and end of life treatments. Being provided with information to make decisions which have not previously been considered may increase feelings of conflict, suggesting these aids should be carefully targeted.

摘要

背景

痴呆症患者的亲属报告称,代理决策困难且令人痛苦。我们系统回顾了关于痴呆症患者家庭照料者进行代理决策的障碍与促进因素,以及用于促进其决策的干预措施的文献。

方法

我们检索了电子数据库以及截至2014年2月纳入论文的参考文献。两位作者使用清单独立评估研究质量。

结果

我们纳入了检索出的符合预定标准的30/104篇论文,并优先选择了高质量论文。家庭照料者报告称,代理决策具有挑战性且可能令人痛苦,尤其是当决策违背受照料者意愿且缺乏医疗专业人员的支持时。已开发出针对特定决策的手册式辅助工具,虽然那些支持关于临时照料和经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)喂养决策的辅助工具在试点试验中显示出了有前景的结果,但在随机对照试验中,尚未有干预措施被证明能显著减少决策冲突或照料者负担,或增加知识;一种用于预先护理计划的决策辅助工具增加了决策冲突。

结论

我们建议开发并测试针对照料者报告中最令人痛苦的决策的决策辅助工具,包括那些关于人们应居住何处、获取服务以及临终治疗等方面的决策。提供有关做出以前未考虑过的决策的信息可能会增加冲突感,这表明这些辅助工具应谨慎定位目标人群。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验