Suppr超能文献

微创主动脉瓣手术:克利夫兰诊所的经验。

Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience.

作者信息

Johnston Douglas R, Roselli Eric E

机构信息

Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;4(2):140-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.10.03.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery has become a routine approach for aortic valve disease over the last 18 years at the Cleveland Clinic. It is performed in isolation or in combination with other procedures. The objective of this study is to review trends and outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Cleveland Clinic Cardiovascular Information Registry (CVIR) was searched for aortic valve procedures from 1996 to 2013. All patients undergoing isolated or combined aortic valve operations were included for analysis. The incision type and procedure type were reviewed and trends were evaluated over time. Cleveland Clinic outcomes with minimally invasive approaches to the aortic valve are reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 22,766 aortic valve surgical procedures were performed in this 18-year timeframe. Of these, 3,385 (14.9%) were minimally invasive procedures (MIPs) and 2,379 (10.5%) were isolated minimally invasive aortic valves. MIPs increased from 12.4% to 29.6% of the total aortic valve volume over the period of the study. Combined procedures, including concomitant surgery on the aorta, mitral valve, tricuspid valve, and arrhythmia surgery increased over time as well. Overall mortality for primary and reoperative aortic valve operations continues to decline and has consistently been less than 1% for several years.

CONCLUSIONS

A programmed approach to minimally invasive aortic valve surgery (MIAVS) with careful patient selection, appropriate use of preoperative imaging, and selective conversion to sternotomy when necessary, allows for aortic valve replacement (AVR) and a wide range of concomitant procedures to be performed safely in a large number of patients.

摘要

背景

在过去18年里,微创手术已成为克利夫兰诊所治疗主动脉瓣疾病的常规方法。该手术可单独进行,也可与其他手术联合进行。本研究的目的是回顾这些患者的治疗趋势和结果。

方法

检索克利夫兰诊所心血管信息登记系统(CVIR)中1996年至2013年的主动脉瓣手术病例。纳入所有接受单纯或联合主动脉瓣手术的患者进行分析。回顾手术切口类型和手术方式,并评估其随时间的变化趋势。回顾克利夫兰诊所采用微创方法治疗主动脉瓣的结果。

结果

在这18年期间共进行了22766例主动脉瓣手术。其中,3385例(14.9%)为微创手术(MIPs),2379例(10.5%)为单纯微创主动脉瓣手术。在研究期间,MIPs占主动脉瓣手术总量的比例从12.4%增加到29.6%。包括同期主动脉、二尖瓣、三尖瓣手术及心律失常手术在内的联合手术也随时间增加。初次和再次主动脉瓣手术的总体死亡率持续下降,并且连续数年一直低于1%。

结论

采用程序化方法进行微创主动脉瓣手术(MIAVS),仔细选择患者,合理使用术前影像学检查,并在必要时选择性转为胸骨切开术,可使大量患者安全地进行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)及多种同期手术。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience.微创主动脉瓣手术:克利夫兰诊所的经验。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;4(2):140-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.10.03.
2
7
Minimally invasive approach for complex cardiac surgery procedures.复杂心脏手术的微创方法。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Aug;88(2):462-6; discussion 467. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.060.
8
Isolated and concomitant minimally invasive minithoracotomy aortic valve surgery.孤立性及合并性微创小切口主动脉瓣手术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar;155(3):926-936.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.044. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
10
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: "The Leipzig experience".微创二尖瓣手术:“莱比锡经验”。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Nov;2(6):744-50. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.10.14.

引用本文的文献

7
The Opportunities and Limitations of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.微创心脏手术的机遇与局限。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Nov 17;114(46):777-784. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0777.

本文引用的文献

1
Current era minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: techniques and practice.当前时代的微创主动脉瓣置换术:技术与实践。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.086. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
2
Pre-operative 3D CT imaging for virtual planning of minimally invasive aortic valve surgery.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb;6(2):269-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.08.017.
5
Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery.经改良的 J 型切口行主动脉瓣手术的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Oct;144(4):852-858.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
8
Less invasive versus conventional double-valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison.微创与传统双瓣手术的比较:倾向匹配比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jun;141(6):1461-8.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.05.053. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
10
Characterization and outcome of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jun;137(6):1430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.12.030. Epub 2009 Mar 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验