• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患儿个体内变异性的发育差异。

Developmental differences in intra-individual variability in children with ADHD and ASD.

作者信息

van Belle Janna, van Hulst Branko M, Durston Sarah

机构信息

NICHE Lab, Department of Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Magnus Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;56(12):1316-26. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12417. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12417
PMID:25871802
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intra-individual variability reflects temporal variation within an individual's performance on a cognitive task. Children with developmental disorders, such as ADHD and ASD show increased levels of intra-individual variability. In typical development, intra-individual variability decreases sharply between the ages 6 and 20. The tight link between intra-individual variability and age has led to the suggestion that it may be marker of neural development. As there is accumulating evidence that ADHD and ASD are characterised by atypical neurodevelopmental trajectories, we set out to explore developmental changes in intra-individual variability in subjects with ADHD and ASD.

METHOD

We used propensity score matching to match a cross-sectional sample of children with ADHD, ASD and control subjects (N = 405, aged 6-19 years old) for age, IQ and gender. We used ex-Gaussian distribution parameters to characterise intra-individual variability on fast responses (sigma) and slow responses (tau).

RESULT

Results showed that there was a similar decrease in mean response times with age across groups, and an interaction between age and group for measures of variability, where there was a much lower rate of change in the variability parameters (sigma and tau) for subjects with ASD compared with the other two groups. Subjects with ADHD had higher intra-individual variability, reflected by both sigma and tau, but the rate of decrease in variability with age was similar to that of the controls.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that subjects with ADHD, ASD and controls differ in the rate at which intra-individual variability decreases during development, and support the idea that intra-individual variability may be a marker of neural development, mimicking the neurodevelopmental changes in these disorders.

摘要

背景

个体内变异性反映了个体在认知任务表现中的时间变化。患有发育障碍的儿童,如注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD),其个体内变异性水平会升高。在典型发育过程中,个体内变异性在6至20岁之间会急剧下降。个体内变异性与年龄之间的紧密联系表明,它可能是神经发育的一个标志。由于越来越多的证据表明ADHD和ASD具有非典型的神经发育轨迹,我们着手探索ADHD和ASD患者个体内变异性的发育变化。

方法

我们使用倾向得分匹配法,为年龄、智商和性别的ADHD儿童、ASD儿童和对照组儿童(N = 405,年龄6 - 19岁)的横断面样本进行匹配。我们使用前高斯分布参数来表征快速反应(sigma)和慢速反应(tau)的个体内变异性。

结果

结果显示,各年龄组的平均反应时间随年龄增长而有类似的下降,并且在变异性测量方面年龄与组别之间存在交互作用,其中与其他两组相比,ASD患者变异性参数(sigma和tau)的变化率要低得多。ADHD患者的个体内变异性更高,这通过sigma和tau两者都能体现出来,但变异性随年龄下降的速率与对照组相似。

结论

这些结果表明,ADHD、ASD患者和对照组在发育过程中个体内变异性下降的速率存在差异,并支持个体内变异性可能是神经发育标志的观点,这与这些疾病中的神经发育变化相类似。

相似文献

1
Developmental differences in intra-individual variability in children with ADHD and ASD.注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患儿个体内变异性的发育差异。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;56(12):1316-26. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12417. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
2
Response time variability under slow and fast-incentive conditions in children with ASD, ADHD and ASD+ADHD.患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)以及同时患有ASD和ADHD的儿童在慢速和快速激励条件下的反应时间变异性。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;57(12):1414-1423. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12608. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
Capturing the dynamics of response variability in the brain in ADHD.捕捉注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者大脑中反应变异性的动态变化。
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Dec 1;7:132-41. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.014. eCollection 2015.
4
Neural substrates of behavioral variability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: based on ex-Gaussian reaction time distribution and diffusion spectrum imaging tractography.注意力缺陷多动障碍行为变异性的神经基础:基于前高斯反应时分布和扩散谱成像纤维束追踪技术
Psychol Med. 2014 Jun;44(8):1751-64. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001955. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
5
Intra-individual reaction time variability based on ex-Gaussian distribution as a potential endophenotype for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.基于指数高斯分布的个体内反应时变异性可作为注意缺陷多动障碍的潜在内表型。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 Jul;132(1):39-50. doi: 10.1111/acps.12393. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
6
Intra-individual variability in ADHD, autism spectrum disorders and Tourette's syndrome.注意缺陷多动障碍、自闭症谱系障碍和抽动秽语综合征的个体内变异性。
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Nov;46(13):3030-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Jun 21.
7
Development of Planning in Children with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders and/or Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.高功能自闭症谱系障碍和/或注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童的规划能力发展
Autism Res. 2016 Jul;9(7):739-51. doi: 10.1002/aur.1574. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
8
Ex-Gaussian, Frequency and Reward Analyses Reveal Specificity of Reaction Time Fluctuations to ADHD and Not Autism Traits.外显高斯模型、频率和奖励分析揭示了 ADHD 而非自闭症特征对反应时波动的特异性。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Mar;47(3):557-567. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0457-z.
9
Studying global processing in autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with gaze movements: The example of a copying task.运用眼动追踪研究自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍的整体加工过程:以临摹任务为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0224186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224186. eCollection 2020.
10
Annual research review: Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: measurement and mechanisms of a proposed trans-diagnostic phenotype.年度研究综述:注意缺陷多动障碍和自闭症谱系障碍中的反应时变异性:一种拟议的跨诊断表型的测量与机制
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;55(6):685-710. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12217. Epub 2014 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Elongated tau in an ex-Gaussian decomposition of vocal articulation speed in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童语音清晰度速度的前高斯分解中的延长τ值。
Neuropsychology. 2025 Sep;39(6):548-560. doi: 10.1037/neu0001015. Epub 2025 May 8.
2
Protocol and preregistration for the CODEC project: measuring, modelling and mechanistically understanding the nature of cognitive variability in early childhood.CODEC 项目的方案和预先注册:测量、建模并从机制上理解儿童早期认知变异性的本质。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jul 26;12(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01904-5.
3
Assessment of ADHD Subtypes Using Motion Tracking Recognition Based on Stroop Color-Word Tests.
基于 Stroop 色词测试的运动跟踪识别评估 ADHD 亚型。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 5;24(2):323. doi: 10.3390/s24020323.
4
Differences in Ex-Gaussian Parameters from Response Time Distributions Between Individuals with and Without Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-analysis.个体的反应时分布中外加高斯参数差异:注意缺陷多动障碍与非注意缺陷多动障碍个体的元分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Mar;34(1):320-337. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09587-2. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
5
Using inspection time and ex-Gaussian parameters of reaction time to predict executive functions in children with ADHD.利用检查时间和反应时的前高斯参数预测多动症儿童的执行功能。
Intelligence. 2018 Jul-Aug;69:186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
Selective Inhibitory Control in Middle Childhood.选择性抑制控制在儿童中期。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;18(12):6300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126300.
7
Inhibitory Dimensions and Delay of Gratification: A Comparative Study on Individuals with Down Syndrome and Typically Developing Children.抑制维度与延迟满足:唐氏综合征个体与正常发育儿童的比较研究
Brain Sci. 2021 May 14;11(5):636. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050636.
8
Studying global processing in autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with gaze movements: The example of a copying task.运用眼动追踪研究自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍的整体加工过程:以临摹任务为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0224186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224186. eCollection 2020.
9
Visual search in ADHD, ASD and ASD + ADHD: overlapping or dissociating disorders?ADHD、ASD 和 ASD+ADHD 中的视觉搜索:重叠还是分离的障碍?
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;30(4):549-562. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01535-2. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
10
Distinct and similar patterns of emotional development in adolescents and young adults.青少年和年轻人情绪发展的独特和相似模式。
Dev Psychobiol. 2020 Jul;62(5):591-599. doi: 10.1002/dev.21942. Epub 2019 Dec 4.