Glaser Diana A, Farnsworth Christine L, Varley Eric S, Nunn Thomas A, Sayad-Shah Mehria, Breisch Eric A, Yaszay Burt
Rady Children's Hospital, Orthopedic Biomechanics Research Center, San Diego, CA.
Rady Children's Hospital, Orthopedic Biomechanics Research Center, San Diego, CA; email:
Wounds. 2012 Nov;24(11):308-16.
Negative pressure therapy (NPT), used on open wounds or postoperative infections, has not been evaluated on closed spinal incisions. This was analyzed after 3 days and 5 days of NPT application using biomechanics and histology in a porcine model.
In 8 mature miniature pigs, 2 end-to-end midline spine incisions were closed in a standard fashion. Negative pressure (Prevena™ Incision Management System, KCI, San Antonio,TX) was applied to one incision (NPT group) while standard dry dressings were used on the other (control group). After 3 days or 5 days, all incisions underwent biomechanical (eg, failure load, failure energy, and stress), histological, and scar scale evaluation.
ANOVAs compared the groups (3-day vs 5-day, NPT vs control, P < 0.05). Negative pressure therapy demonstrated a significantly improved scar scale height grade than the control (P = 0.026). Failure load (4.9 ± 4.0 vs 16.5 ± 14.6 N), energy absorbed (8.0 ± 9.0 vs. 26.9 ± 23.0 mJ), and ultimate stress (62 ± 53 vs. 204 ± 118 N/mm2) were lower in the control group. Histological analysis revealed no differences in incision scar width.
Negative pressure therapy application on closed incisions presented a trend toward improved early healing strength, and in significantly improved incision appearance. Clinically, NPT may improve incision integrity, minimizing the risk of dehiscence or subsequent infection. Patients at high risk of postoperative incision site complications may benefit from primary application of NPT.
负压疗法(NPT)用于开放性伤口或术后感染,但尚未在闭合性脊柱切口上进行评估。在猪模型中,使用生物力学和组织学方法,对应用NPT 3天和5天后的情况进行了分析。
在8只成年小型猪中,以标准方式闭合2个端对端的脊柱中线切口。对一个切口应用负压(Prevena™切口管理系统,KCI,圣安东尼奥,德克萨斯州)(NPT组),而另一个切口使用标准干敷料(对照组)。3天或5天后,对所有切口进行生物力学(如破坏载荷、破坏能量和应力)、组织学和瘢痕量表评估。
方差分析比较了各组(3天与5天、NPT与对照组,P<0.05)。负压疗法显示瘢痕量表高度分级明显优于对照组(P = 0.026)。对照组的破坏载荷(4.9±4.0对16.5±14.6 N)、吸收能量(8.0±9.0对26.9±23.0 mJ)和极限应力(62±53对204±118 N/mm2)较低。组织学分析显示切口瘢痕宽度无差异。
在闭合性切口中应用负压疗法呈现出早期愈合强度改善的趋势,且切口外观明显改善。临床上,NPT可能会改善切口完整性,将裂开或后续感染的风险降至最低。术后切口部位并发症高危患者可能从NPT的初次应用中获益。