• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短期试验中不同有机肥对白浆水稻土生化及微生物特性的影响

Effects of different organic manures on the biochemical and microbial characteristics of albic paddy soil in a short-term experiment.

作者信息

Zhang Qian, Zhou Wei, Liang Guoqing, Wang Xiubin, Sun Jingwen, He Ping, Li Lujiu

机构信息

Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China.

Institute of Soil and Fertilizer, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, P.R. China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0124096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124096. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0124096
PMID:25879759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4399876/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of chemical fertilizer (NPK), NPK with livestock manure (NPK+M), NPK with straw (NPK+S), and NPK with green manure (NPK+G) on soil enzyme activities and microbial characteristics of albic paddy soil, which is a typical soil with low productivity in China. The responses of extracellular enzyme activities and the microbial community diversity (determined by phospholipid fatty acid analysis [PLFA] and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [DGGE]) were measured. The results showed that NPK+M and NPK+S significantly increased rice yield, with NPK+M being approximately 24% greater than NPK. The NPK+M significantly increased soil organic carbon (SOC) and available phosphate (P) and enhanced phosphatase, β-cellobiosidase, L-leucine aminopeptidase and urease activities. The NPK+S significantly increased SOC and available potassium (K) and significantly enhanced N-acetyl-glucosamidase, β-xylosidase, urease, and phenol oxidase activities. The NPK+G significantly improved total nitrogen (N), ammonium N, available P, and N-acetyl-glucosamidase activity. The PLFA biomass was highest under NPK+S, followed by NPK+M and NPK+G treatments. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the PLFA indicated that soils with NPK+M and NPK+S contained higher proportions of unsaturated and cyclopropane fatty acids (biomarkers of fungi and gram-negative bacteria) and soil under NPK+G contained more straight chain saturated fatty acids (representing gram-positive bacteria). PCA of the DGGE patterns showed that organic amendments had a greater influence on fungal community. Cluster analysis of fungal DGGE patterns revealed that NPK+G was clearly separated. Meanwhile, the bacterial community of NPK+M treatment was the most distinct. RDA analysis revealed changes of microbial community composition mostly depended on β-xylosidase, β-cellobiosidase activities, total N and available K contents. The abundances of gram-negative bacterial and fungal PLFAs probably effective in improving fertility of low-yield albic paddy soil because of their significant influence on DGGE profile.

摘要

本研究旨在评估化肥(氮磷钾)、氮磷钾配施畜禽粪便(NPK+M)、氮磷钾配施秸秆(NPK+S)以及氮磷钾配施绿肥(NPK+G)对白浆水稻土土壤酶活性和微生物特性的影响,白浆水稻土是中国典型的低产土壤。测定了胞外酶活性和微生物群落多样性(通过磷脂脂肪酸分析[PLFA]和变性梯度凝胶电泳[DGGE]测定)的响应。结果表明,NPK+M和NPK+S显著提高了水稻产量,其中NPK+M比NPK高出约24%。NPK+M显著增加了土壤有机碳(SOC)和有效磷(P),并提高了磷酸酶、β-纤维二糖酶、L-亮氨酸氨肽酶和脲酶的活性。NPK+S显著增加了SOC和有效钾(K),并显著提高了N-乙酰葡糖胺酶、β-木糖苷酶、脲酶和酚氧化酶的活性。NPK+G显著提高了全氮(N)、铵态氮、有效磷和N-乙酰葡糖胺酶的活性。PLFA生物量在NPK+S处理下最高,其次是NPK+M和NPK+G处理。PLFA的主成分分析(PCA)表明,NPK+M和NPK+S处理的土壤中不饱和脂肪酸和环丙烷脂肪酸(真菌和革兰氏阴性菌的生物标志物)比例较高,NPK+G处理的土壤中直链饱和脂肪酸(代表革兰氏阳性菌)含量较多。DGGE图谱的PCA表明,有机改良剂对真菌群落的影响更大。真菌DGGE图谱的聚类分析表明,NPK+G明显分离。同时,NPK+M处理的细菌群落最为独特。冗余分析(RDA)表明,微生物群落组成的变化主要取决于β-木糖苷酶、β-纤维二糖酶活性、全氮和有效钾含量。革兰氏阴性菌和真菌PLFAs的丰度可能对提高低产白浆水稻土的肥力有效,因为它们对DGGE图谱有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/c58ae1f5a834/pone.0124096.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/c7465f96b024/pone.0124096.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/c544c56fe922/pone.0124096.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/9b25990aeee9/pone.0124096.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/1da329417cbc/pone.0124096.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/c58ae1f5a834/pone.0124096.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/c7465f96b024/pone.0124096.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/c544c56fe922/pone.0124096.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/9b25990aeee9/pone.0124096.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/1da329417cbc/pone.0124096.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be9/4399876/c58ae1f5a834/pone.0124096.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of different organic manures on the biochemical and microbial characteristics of albic paddy soil in a short-term experiment.短期试验中不同有机肥对白浆水稻土生化及微生物特性的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0124096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124096. eCollection 2015.
2
[Effects of Long-term Fertilization Regimes on Microbial Biomass, Community Structure and Activity in a Paddy Soil].[长期施肥制度对水稻土微生物生物量、群落结构及活性的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 Jan 8;39(1):430-437. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201706039.
3
[Effect of Long-term Fertilizer Application on the Stability of Organic Carbon in Particle Size Fractions of a Paddy Soil in Zhejiang Province, China].[长期施肥对中国浙江省水稻土不同粒径颗粒有机碳稳定性的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2015 May;36(5):1827-35.
4
Effects of inorganic and organic amendment on soil chemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial community and soil quality in yellow clayey soil.无机和有机改良剂对黄黏土土壤化学性质、酶活性、微生物群落及土壤质量的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 6;12(3):e0172767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172767. eCollection 2017.
5
Responses of absolute and specific soil enzyme activities to long term additions of organic and mineral fertilizer.长期施用有机和无机肥料对土壤酶活性的绝对和特定响应。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 1;536:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.043. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
6
Linkages between straw decomposition rate and the change in microbial fractions and extracellular enzyme activities in soils under different long-term fertilization treatments.不同长期施肥处理下土壤中秸秆分解率与微生物分室变化及胞外酶活性的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0202660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202660. eCollection 2018.
7
[Effects of long-term fertilization on paddy soils organic nitrogen, microbial biomass, and microbial functional diversity].长期施肥对水稻土有机氮、微生物生物量及微生物功能多样性的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2010 Jun;21(6):1477-84.
8
[Microbial activity and community structure analysis under the different land use patterns in farmland soils: based on the methods PLFA and MicroResp].基于磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)和微呼吸方法的农田土壤不同土地利用模式下微生物活性与群落结构分析
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013 Jun;34(6):2375-82.
9
Dynamics of microbial biomass and community composition after short-term water status change in Chinese paddy soils.短期水分状况变化后中国稻田土壤微生物生物量和群落组成的动态。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jan;25(3):2932-2941. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0690-y. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
[Microbial Carbon Source Metabolic Profile in Rice Rhizosphere and Non-rhizosphere Soils with Different Long-term Fertilization Management].[不同长期施肥管理下水稻根际和非根际土壤微生物碳源代谢特征]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2019 Mar 8;40(3):1475-1482. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201808022.

引用本文的文献

1
"Harnessing the power of soil microbes: Their dual impact in integrated nutrient management and mediating climate stress for sustainable rice crop production" A systematic review.“利用土壤微生物的力量:它们在综合养分管理及缓解气候压力以实现水稻可持续生产中的双重作用” 一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 12;11(1):e41158. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41158. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
2
Rice-based integrated farming system improves the soil quality, bacterial community structure and system productivity under sub-humid tropical condition.稻基综合种养模式在亚热带动条件下改善土壤质量、细菌群落结构和系统生产力。
Environ Geochem Health. 2024 Feb 7;46(2):65. doi: 10.1007/s10653-024-01863-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Responses of bacterial communities in arable soils in a rice-wheat cropping system to different fertilizer regimes and sampling times.稻麦轮作系统中耕地土壤细菌群落对不同施肥制度和采样时间的响应。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 20;9(1):e85301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085301. eCollection 2014.
2
Acidobacterial community responses to agricultural management of soybean in Amazon forest soils.酸性细菌群落对亚马逊森林土壤中大豆农业管理的响应。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013 Mar;83(3):607-21. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12018. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
3
Abiotic drivers and plant traits explain landscape-scale patterns in soil microbial communities.
Application of bio-organic amendments improves soil quality and yield of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) plants in saline calcareous soil.
生物有机改良剂的应用提高了盐碱石灰土中茴香(Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)植株的土壤质量和产量。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 14;13(1):19876. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45780-2.
4
Functional Hydrogels for Agricultural Application.用于农业应用的功能性水凝胶
Gels. 2023 Jul 22;9(7):590. doi: 10.3390/gels9070590.
5
Metabolomics and Microbiomics Reveal Impacts of Rhizosphere Metabolites on Alfalfa Continuous Cropping.代谢组学和微生物组学揭示根际代谢物对苜蓿连作的影响。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 21;13:833968. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.833968. eCollection 2022.
6
The Phlorizin-Degrading XNRB-3 Mediates Soil Microorganisms to Alleviate Apple Replant Disease.根皮苷降解菌XNRB-3介导土壤微生物减轻苹果再植病
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 3;13:839484. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.839484. eCollection 2022.
7
Succession Pattern in Soil Micro-Ecology Under Tobacco ( L.) Continuous Cropping Circumstances in Yunnan Province of Southwest China.中国西南部云南省烟草连作条件下土壤微生态的演替模式
Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 3;12:785110. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.785110. eCollection 2021.
8
Filtered mud improves sugarcane growth and modifies the functional abundance and structure of soil microbial populations.过滤泥浆可改善甘蔗生长,并改变土壤微生物种群的功能丰度和结构。
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 13;10:e12753. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12753. eCollection 2022.
9
Bio-fertilizer Affects Structural Dynamics, Function, and Network Patterns of the Sugarcane Rhizospheric Microbiota.生物肥料影响甘蔗根际微生物区系的结构动态、功能和网络模式。
Microb Ecol. 2022 Nov;84(4):1195-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00248-021-01932-3. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
10
Variation in archaeal and bacterial community profiles and their functional metabolic predictions under the influence of pure and mixed fertilizers in paddy soil.稻田土壤中纯肥料和混合肥料影响下古菌和细菌群落概况及其功能代谢预测的变化
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Nov;28(11):6077-6085. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.091. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
非生物驱动因素和植物特性解释了土壤微生物群落的景观尺度格局。
Ecol Lett. 2012 Nov;15(11):1230-1239. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01844.x. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
4
Impact of chlorophenols on microbiota of an unpolluted acidic soil: microbial resistance and biodegradation.氯酚类化合物对未受污染酸性土壤中微生物群落的影响:微生物抗性与生物降解。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 Oct;78(1):150-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01093.x. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
5
Soil bacterial diversity in the Arctic is not fundamentally different from that found in other biomes.北极地区的土壤细菌多样性与其他生物群落中的多样性并无根本区别。
Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov;12(11):2998-3006. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02277.x.
6
Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil.耕地土壤 pH 梯度上的土壤细菌和真菌群落。
ISME J. 2010 Oct;4(10):1340-51. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.58. Epub 2010 May 6.
7
Short-term incorporation of organic manures and biofertilizers influences biochemical and microbial characteristics of soils under an annual crop [Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.)].短期施用有机肥和生物肥料对一年生作物[ turmeric (Curcuma longa L.)]下土壤的生化和微生物特性有影响。
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jun;101(12):4697-702. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.108. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
8
Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale.基于焦磷酸测序法评估土壤pH值作为大陆尺度土壤细菌群落结构预测指标的研究
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Aug;75(15):5111-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00335-09. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
9
A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses.利用焦磷酸测序和克隆文库分析对土壤酸杆菌多样性进行的全面调查。
ISME J. 2009 Apr;3(4):442-53. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.127. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
10
Characterization of microbial communities in a pilot-scale constructed wetland using PLFA and PCR-DGGE analyses.利用磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)分析和聚合酶链式反应-变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE)分析对中试规模人工湿地中的微生物群落进行表征。
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2007 Sep;42(11):1639-47. doi: 10.1080/10934520701518125.