Dickinson Katherine L, Kanyomse Ernest, Piedrahita Ricardo, Coffey Evan, Rivera Isaac J, Adoctor James, Alirigia Rex, Muvandimwe Didier, Dove MacKenzie, Dukic Vanja, Hayden Mary H, Diaz-Sanchez David, Abisiba Adoctor Victor, Anaseba Dominic, Hagar Yolanda, Masson Nicholas, Monaghan Andrew, Titiati Atsu, Steinhoff Daniel F, Hsu Yueh-Ya, Kaspar Rachael, Brooks Bre'Anna, Hodgson Abraham, Hannigan Michael, Oduro Abraham Rexford, Wiedinmyer Christine
National Center for Atmospheric Research, PO Box 3000, Boulder, CO, 80307, USA.
University of Colorado - Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309-0427, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 12;15:126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1414-1.
Cooking over open fires using solid fuels is both common practice throughout much of the world and widely recognized to contribute to human health, environmental, and social problems. The public health burden of household air pollution includes an estimated four million premature deaths each year. To be effective and generate useful insight into potential solutions, cookstove intervention studies must select cooking technologies that are appropriate for local socioeconomic conditions and cooking culture, and include interdisciplinary measurement strategies along a continuum of outcomes.
METHODS/DESIGN: REACCTING (Research on Emissions, Air quality, Climate, and Cooking Technologies in Northern Ghana) is an ongoing interdisciplinary randomized cookstove intervention study in the Kassena-Nankana District of Northern Ghana. The study tests two types of biomass burning stoves that have the potential to meet local cooking needs and represent different "rungs" in the cookstove technology ladder: a locally-made low-tech rocket stove and the imported, highly efficient Philips gasifier stove. Intervention households were randomized into four different groups, three of which received different combinations of two improved stoves, while the fourth group serves as a control for the duration of the study. Diverse measurements assess different points along the causal chain linking the intervention to final outcomes of interest. We assess stove use and cooking behavior, cooking emissions, household air pollution and personal exposure, health burden, and local to regional air quality. Integrated analysis and modeling will tackle a range of interdisciplinary science questions, including examining ambient exposures among the regional population, assessing how those exposures might change with different technologies and behaviors, and estimating the comparative impact of local behavior and technological changes versus regional climate variability and change on local air quality and health outcomes.
REACCTING is well-poised to generate useful data on the impact of a cookstove intervention on a wide range of outcomes. By comparing different technologies side by side and employing an interdisciplinary approach to study this issue from multiple perspectives, this study may help to inform future efforts to improve health and quality of life for populations currently relying on open fires for their cooking needs.
在世界许多地方,使用固体燃料在明火上做饭是常见的做法,并且人们普遍认识到这会导致人类健康、环境和社会问题。家庭空气污染造成的公共卫生负担估计每年导致400万人过早死亡。为了有效并深入了解潜在解决方案,炉灶干预研究必须选择适合当地社会经济条件和烹饪文化的烹饪技术,并包括一系列连续结果的跨学科测量策略。
方法/设计:REACCTING(加纳北部排放、空气质量、气候和烹饪技术研究)是加纳北部卡塞纳-南卡纳区正在进行的一项跨学科随机炉灶干预研究。该研究测试了两种有潜力满足当地烹饪需求且代表炉灶技术阶梯上不同“等级”的生物质燃烧炉灶:一种本地制造的低技术火箭炉灶和进口的高效飞利浦气化炉。干预家庭被随机分为四组,其中三组接受两种改良炉灶的不同组合,而第四组在研究期间作为对照组。多样的测量评估了从干预到最终感兴趣结果的因果链上的不同点。我们评估炉灶使用和烹饪行为、烹饪排放、家庭空气污染和个人暴露、健康负担以及当地到区域的空气质量。综合分析和建模将解决一系列跨学科科学问题,包括研究区域人口中的环境暴露、评估这些暴露如何随不同技术和行为而变化,以及估计当地行为和技术变化与区域气候变率和变化对当地空气质量和健康结果的比较影响。
REACCTING有充分准备生成关于炉灶干预对广泛结果影响的有用数据。通过并排比较不同技术并采用跨学科方法从多个角度研究这个问题,本研究可能有助于为未来改善目前依赖明火做饭人群的健康和生活质量的努力提供信息。