Herent P, Stynen D, Hernando F, Fruit J, Poulain D
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 42, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Aug;30(8):2158-64. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.8.2158-2164.1992.
Two latex agglutination tests for the detection of Candida antigens, Pastorex Candida (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) and Cand-Tec (Ramco Laboratories, Inc., Houston, Tex.), were applied to 79 serum samples from 19 patients who were retrospectively selected on the basis of mycological and clinical evidence of C. albicans infection and the availability of serial serum samples taken near the date of a positive culture. The specificity in 60 control individuals was 100% for Pastorex and 98.3% for Cand-Tec. The tests scored positive for 10 (52.6%) and 9 (47.4%) patients, respectively. Pastorex detected antigen in only 3 of 12 patients (25%) with positive antibody detection tests, but was positive for all 7 patients (100%) who produced no or a low antibody response, suggesting that the test performs better in the absence of antibodies. However, the sensitivity of Pastorex also increased with the number of samples available per patient, which was lower for high-antibody-responder patients (2.8 versus 5.7). If the patients who provided only one or two serum samples were eliminated, the sensitivity of Pastorex rose to 76.9%. For the Cand-Tec, the sensitivity was not related to the presence of antibodies, nor was it related to the number of samples per patient. The observed antigenemia was transient with both Pastorex and Cand-Tec. Only 12.5% of the positive reactions occurred on the same serum sample, confirming that the two tests react with different antigens. A positive antigen test preceded other diagnostic indications for 6 of 10 Pastorex-positive patients and 5 of 9 Cand-Tec-positive patients.
两种用于检测念珠菌抗原的乳胶凝集试验,即Pastorex念珠菌试验(法国马恩拉科凯特赛诺菲诊断巴斯德公司)和Cand - Tec试验(美国得克萨斯州休斯顿Ramco实验室公司),应用于19例患者的79份血清样本。这些患者是根据白色念珠菌感染的真菌学和临床证据以及在阳性培养日期附近采集的系列血清样本的可用性进行回顾性选择的。60名对照个体中,Pastorex试验的特异性为100%,Cand - Tec试验的特异性为98.3%。这两种试验分别对10例(52.6%)和9例(47.4%)患者检测为阳性。Pastorex试验在12例抗体检测试验呈阳性的患者中仅检测到3例(25%)抗原,但在所有7例无抗体反应或低抗体反应的患者中均呈阳性(100%),这表明该试验在无抗体时表现更好。然而,Pastorex试验的敏感性也随着每位患者可用样本数量的增加而提高,高抗体反应患者的样本数量较少(2.8份对5.7份)。如果排除仅提供一两份血清样本的患者,Pastorex试验的敏感性升至76.9%。对于Cand - Tec试验,敏感性与抗体的存在无关,也与每位患者的样本数量无关。观察到的抗原血症在Pastorex和Cand - Tec试验中都是短暂的。仅12.5%的阳性反应出现在同一份血清样本上,证实这两种试验与不同的抗原发生反应。10例Pastorex试验阳性患者中有6例、9例Cand - Tec试验阳性患者中有5例,抗原检测呈阳性先于其他诊断指标出现。