Lee Sulim, Choun Soyoung, Aldwin Carolyn M, Levenson Michael R
Department of Psychology at Open Cyber, University in South Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2015 Jun;30(2):143-61. doi: 10.1007/s10823-015-9259-8.
Whether wisdom is a culturally-specific or universal construct is a matter of some debate (see Curnow 1999; Grossman et al. Psychological Science, 2012). This study compared similarities and differences in the factor structure of a measure of wisdom focused on self-transcendence in U.S. (n = 305, M(age) = 33.99) and Korean samples (n = 838, M(age) = 30.28), with ages ranging from 20 to 73). The Adult Self-Transcendence Inventory (ASTI; Levenson et al. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60, 127-143, 2005) has two factors, self-transcendence and alienation, the latter of which was included to differentiate between social withdrawals due to contemplative practices versus that due to depression. Confirmatory factor analyses found a partial scalar factorial invariance model fit the data best, indicating that the factor structure of the ASTI is largely equivalent and that the construct is comparable across the two cultures. Regression analyses showed that age and religiousness were related to self-transcendence and alienation. Education was related to self-transcendence only. The interaction between age and culture was significant on alienation; alienation was higher in mid-life Koreans but not in Americans, which may reflect either age or cohort effects. Thus, self-transcendence may be a more universal measure of wisdom than those based on pragmatics or cognitive functioning.
智慧是一种特定文化的还是普遍的概念,这是一个存在一定争议的问题(见库尔诺,1999年;格罗斯曼等人,《心理科学》,2012年)。本研究比较了美国样本(n = 305,年龄均值M(age)=33.99)和韩国样本(n = 838,年龄均值M(age)=30.28)中一项关注自我超越的智慧测量指标在因素结构上的异同,年龄范围为20至73岁。成人自我超越量表(ASTI;莱文森等人,《国际老龄与人类发展杂志》,第60卷,第127 - 143页,2005年)有两个因素,即自我超越和疏离感,纳入后者是为了区分因沉思练习导致的社交退缩与因抑郁导致的社交退缩。验证性因素分析发现部分标量因素不变性模型最符合数据,这表明ASTI的因素结构在很大程度上是等效的,并且该概念在两种文化中具有可比性。回归分析表明,年龄和宗教信仰与自我超越及疏离感相关。教育仅与自我超越相关。年龄与文化之间的交互作用在疏离感方面具有显著性;中年韩国人的疏离感较高,而美国人则不然,这可能反映了年龄或队列效应。因此,与基于实用主义或认知功能的智慧测量指标相比,自我超越可能是一种更具普遍性的智慧测量指标。