• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衰老与智慧:文化很重要。

Aging and wisdom: culture matters.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1059-66. doi: 10.1177/0956797612446025. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1177/0956797612446025
PMID:22933459
Abstract

People from different cultures vary in the ways they approach social conflicts, with Japanese being more motivated to maintain interpersonal harmony and avoid conflicts than Americans are. Such cultural differences have developmental consequences for reasoning about social conflict. In the study reported here, we interviewed random samples of Americans from the Midwest United States and Japanese from the larger Tokyo area about their reactions to stories of intergroup and interpersonal conflicts. Responses showed that wisdom (e.g., recognition of multiple perspectives, the limits of personal knowledge, and the importance of compromise) increased with increasing age among Americans, but older age was not associated with wiser responses among Japanese. Younger and middle-aged Japanese showed greater use of wise-reasoning strategies than younger and middle-aged Americans did. This cultural difference was weaker for older participants' reactions to interpersonal conflicts and was actually reversed for intergroup conflicts. This research has important implications for the study of aging, cultural psychology, and wisdom.

摘要

不同文化的人在处理社会冲突的方式上存在差异,与美国人相比,日本人更有动力维持人际关系和谐,避免冲突。这种文化差异对社会冲突推理有发展上的影响。在本研究中,我们采访了来自美国中西部的随机美国人和来自更大的东京地区的日本人,了解他们对群体间和人际冲突故事的反应。研究结果表明,美国人的智慧(例如,认识到多种观点、个人知识的局限性以及妥协的重要性)随着年龄的增长而增加,而在日本人中,年龄较大并不与更明智的反应相关。与年轻和中年美国人相比,年轻和中年日本人更倾向于使用明智的推理策略。这种文化差异在参与者对人际冲突的反应中较弱,而在群体间冲突的反应中则相反。这项研究对衰老研究、文化心理学和智慧具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Aging and wisdom: culture matters.衰老与智慧:文化很重要。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1059-66. doi: 10.1177/0956797612446025. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
2
Exploring Solomon's paradox: self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning about close relationships in younger and older adults.探索所罗门悖论:自我抽离消除了年轻和年长成年人在亲密关系明智推理中的自我-他人不对称性。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Aug;25(8):1571-80. doi: 10.1177/0956797614535400. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
3
Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age.从推理中获得社交冲突的解决能力会随着年龄的增长而提高。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 20;107(16):7246-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001715107. Epub 2010 Apr 5.
4
A cultural perspective on emotional experiences across the life span.文化视角下的人生全程情感体验。
Emotion. 2014 Aug;14(4):679-92. doi: 10.1037/a0036041. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
5
Southerners Are Wiser Than Northerners Regarding Interpersonal Conflicts in China.在中国,南方人在人际冲突方面比北方人更明智。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 18;11:225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00225. eCollection 2020.
6
The Wisdom in Virtue: Pursuit of Virtue Predicts Wise Reasoning About Personal Conflicts.美德的智慧:对个人冲突进行明智推理的美德追求。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Dec;28(12):1848-1856. doi: 10.1177/0956797617722621. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Wisdom from life's challenges: qualitative interviews with low- and moderate-income older adults who were nominated as being wise.生活挑战中的智慧:对被提名为有智慧的低收入和中等收入老年人的定性访谈
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2011 Aug-Sep;54(6):592-614. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2011.585438.
8
Age differences in wisdom-related knowledge: does the age relevance of the task matter?年龄与智慧相关知识的差异:任务的年龄相关性重要吗?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Nov;69(6):897-905. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt076. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
9
Making things better and learning a lesson: experiencing wisdom across the lifespan.让事情变得更好并吸取教训:在一生中体验智慧。
J Pers. 2004 Jun;72(3):543-72. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00272.x.
10
Wise reasoning benefits from emodiversity, irrespective of emotional intensity.明智的推理受益于情绪多样性,而不考虑情绪强度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 May;148(5):805-823. doi: 10.1037/xge0000543. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Do bystanders always see more than the players? Exploring Solomon's paradox through meta-analysis.旁观者是否总是比参与者看得更清楚?通过元分析探索所罗门悖论。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 7;14:1181187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181187. eCollection 2023.
2
Thirty Years of Psychological Wisdom Research: What We Know About the Correlates of an Ancient Concept.三十年心理学智慧研究:我们对一个古老概念的相关因素了解多少。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Jul;18(4):778-811. doi: 10.1177/17456916221114096. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
3
Children That Are Victims to Civil War: A Social Approach through Art and Culture-Molega, a Traditional Poso Children's Game: Special Issue.
内战受害者儿童:通过艺术和文化采取的社会方法——莫莱加,波索传统儿童游戏:特刊
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 1;9(7):997. doi: 10.3390/children9070997.
4
Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility.智识谦逊的预测因素及后果。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(9):524-536. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
5
The Wisdom Researchers and the Elephant: An Integrative Model of Wise Behavior.智慧研究者与大象:智慧行为的综合模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2022 Nov;26(4):342-374. doi: 10.1177/10888683221094650. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
Gender Effect on Views of Wisdom and Wisdom Levels.性别对智慧观和智慧水平的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 26;12:725736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725736. eCollection 2021.
7
Wise reasoning, intergroup positivity, and attitude polarization across contexts.明智的推理、群体间的积极性和跨情境的态度极化。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 3;12(1):3313. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23432-1.
8
Southerners Are Wiser Than Northerners Regarding Interpersonal Conflicts in China.在中国,南方人在人际冲突方面比北方人更明智。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 18;11:225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00225. eCollection 2020.
9
A Large-Scale, Cross-Sectional Investigation Into the Efficacy of Brain Training.一项关于大脑训练功效的大规模横断面调查。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jul 9;13:221. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00221. eCollection 2019.
10
Individual differences in level of wisdom are associated with brain activation during a moral decision-making task.个体在智慧水平上的差异与道德决策任务中大脑的激活有关。
Brain Behav. 2019 Jun;9(6):e01302. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1302. Epub 2019 May 1.