• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版门诊患者满意度调查问卷的编制与验证:来自46家公立综合医院和5151名门诊患者的证据

Development and validation of a Chinese outpatient satisfaction questionnaire: evidence from 46 public general hospitals and 5151 outpatients.

作者信息

Wei J, Shen L, Yang H-B, Qin J-B, Huang W, Zhang J-J, Gong Q-Y, Li X-X, Yang T-B

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.

Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.

出版信息

Public Health. 2015 Nov;129(11):1523-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.004
PMID:25907130
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and test a reliable and practical self-administrated questionnaire in Chinese to evaluate outpatient satisfaction in China.

DESIGN

In order to ensure content validity, the 19 items of this questionnaire were generated based on literature review, interview and group discussion. Acceptability was tested by the percentage of missing item responses and the time and operability of administration. Construct validity was evaluated using principal component exploratory factor analysis and item-total correlations. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and inter-subscale correlation.

SETTING

This study was conducted in 46 public general hospitals that report directly to the Provincial Health Department in Hunan Province, China.

SUBJECTS

In total, 5151 outpatients were selected at random and asked to complete the questionnaire after they finished their medical procedures in the outpatient area.

RESULTS

The extremely low rate of missing data (0-0.04%) suggested good acceptability of the questionnaire. Factor analysis generated six dimensions, and all item-total coefficients were >0.8. Cronbach's alpha exceeded 0.7 for all dimensions, and the inter-subscale correlation coefficients were all lower than the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the corresponding scale. According to the results, outpatients were least satisfied with waiting time (86.8%) and most satisfied with the quality of medical care (90.1%).

CONCLUSION

The Chinese outpatient satisfaction questionnaire has good acceptability, validity and reliability. It was effective and efficient for measuring outpatient satisfaction in a Chinese population.

摘要

目的

开发并测试一份可靠且实用的中文自填式问卷,以评估中国门诊患者的满意度。

设计

为确保内容效度,该问卷的19个项目基于文献综述、访谈和小组讨论生成。通过缺失项目回答的百分比以及问卷发放时间和可操作性来测试可接受性。使用主成分探索性因素分析和项目与总分相关性评估结构效度。使用克朗巴哈α系数和分量表间相关性评估问卷的信度。

地点

本研究在中国湖南省46家直接向省卫生厅汇报的公立综合医院开展。

对象

总共随机选取5151名门诊患者,要求他们在门诊区域完成诊疗程序后填写问卷。

结果

极低的数据缺失率(0 - 0.04%)表明问卷具有良好的可接受性。因素分析产生六个维度,所有项目与总分的系数均>0.8。所有维度的克朗巴哈α均超过0.7,分量表间相关系数均低于相应量表的克朗巴哈α系数。结果显示,门诊患者对等待时间最不满意(86.8%),对医疗质量最满意(90.1%)。

结论

中文门诊患者满意度问卷具有良好的可接受性、效度和信度。它在测量中国人群门诊患者满意度方面有效且高效。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a Chinese outpatient satisfaction questionnaire: evidence from 46 public general hospitals and 5151 outpatients.中文版门诊患者满意度调查问卷的编制与验证:来自46家公立综合医院和5151名门诊患者的证据
Public Health. 2015 Nov;129(11):1523-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
2
The Outpatient Experience Questionnaire of comprehensive public hospital in China: development, validity and reliability.中国综合公立医院门诊患者体验问卷:编制、效度与信度
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Feb 1;29(1):40-46. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw133.
3
Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients' opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments.一份用于测量门诊患者对医院咨询科室质量看法的问卷的构建。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Aug 4;2:43. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-43.
4
Development and preliminary validation of a Greek-language outpatient satisfaction questionnaire with principal components and multi-trait analyses.一份采用主成分和多特质分析的希腊语门诊患者满意度调查问卷的编制与初步验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun 6;6:66. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-66.
5
Development of an In-Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for the Chinese Population.针对中国人群的住院患者满意度调查问卷的编制
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144785. eCollection 2015.
6
The OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ): data quality, reliability, and validity in patients attending 52 Norwegian hospitals.门诊患者体验问卷(OPEQ):挪威52家医院患者的数据质量、信度和效度
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14(6):433-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014423.
7
Development and testing of a visit-specific patient satisfaction questionnaire: the Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction With Doctor Questionnaire.特定就诊患者满意度调查问卷的开发与测试:玛格丽特公主医院医生满意度调查问卷
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jun;17(6):1931-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1931.
8
Development and validation of the Chinese surgical inpatient satisfaction and comfort questionnaire.中文外科住院患者满意度和舒适度问卷的编制和验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 30;100(52):e28363. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028363.
9
Reducing waiting time and raising outpatient satisfaction in a Chinese public tertiary general hospital-an interrupted time series study.在中国一家公立三级综合医院减少等待时间并提高门诊患者满意度——一项中断时间序列研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4667-z.
10
Development and validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for outpatients attending health centres in North Indian cities.印度北部城市健康中心门诊患者满意度调查问卷的编制与验证
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014 Apr;19(2):85-93. doi: 10.1177/1355819613508381. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Rural patients' satisfaction with humanistic nursing care in Chinese Public Tertiary Hospitals: a national cross-sectional study.中国公立三级医院农村患者对人文护理的满意度:一项全国性横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;12:1455305. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1455305. eCollection 2024.
2
An evaluation of outpatient satisfaction based on the national standard questionnaire: a satisfaction survey conducted in a tertiary hospital in Shenyang, China.基于国家标准问卷的门诊患者满意度评价:中国沈阳一家三级医院的满意度调查。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 9;12:1348426. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348426. eCollection 2024.
3
Factors and key problems influencing insured's poor perceptions of convenience of basic medical insurance: a mixed methods research of a northern city in China.
影响参保者对基本医疗保险便利性不良感知的因素及关键问题:中国北方某市的混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 5;23(1):1066. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15993-1.
4
Tools for measuring client experiences and satisfaction with healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of measurement properties.用于测量中低收入国家医疗保健客户体验和满意度的工具:测量特性的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09129-9.
5
Influencing Factors of Outpatients' Satisfaction in China a Cross-Sectional Study of 16 Public Tertiary Hospitals.中国门诊患者满意度的影响因素:对16家公立三级医院的横断面研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Jun 9;15:1243-1258. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S311786. eCollection 2021.
6
Factors Associated with Outpatient Satisfaction in Tertiary Hospitals in China: A Systematic Review.中国三级医院门诊满意度相关因素的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 27;17(19):7070. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197070.
7
The Mixed Effect of China's New Health Care Reform on Health Insurance Coverage and the Efficiency of Health Service Utilisation: A Longitudinal Approach.中国新医改对医疗保险覆盖范围和卫生服务利用效率的混合影响:纵向研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 9;17(5):1782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051782.
8
Predictors of patient satisfaction and outpatient health services in China: evidence from the WHO SAGE survey.中国患者满意度和门诊卫生服务的预测因素:来自世卫组织 SAGE 调查的证据。
Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 5;37(4):465-472. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa011.
9
A Measurement Scale to Assess Children's Satisfaction with Hospitalization in the Andalusian Population.评估安达卢西亚人群住院儿童满意度的测量量表。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 27;16(17):3110. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173110.
10
Evaluating Primary Health Care Performance from User Perspective in China: Review of Survey Instruments and Implementation Issues.从用户角度评估中国基层医疗服务绩效:调查工具及实施问题综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 14;16(6):926. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060926.