Suppr超能文献

干预教育后 ICU 护士镇静评分和镇静管理能力。

Sedation scoring and managing abilities of intensive care nurses post educational intervention.

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Intensive Care Unit, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2017 May;22(3):141-149. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12180. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate sedation assessment can jeopardize patient comfort and safety. Therefore, nurses' abilities in assessing and managing sedation are vital for effective care of mechanically ventilated patients.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study assessed nurses' sedation scoring and management abilities as primary outcomes following educational interventions. Nurses' perceived self-confidence and barriers to effective sedation management were assessed as secondary outcomes.

DESIGN

A post-test-only quasi-experimental design was used. Data were collected at 3 and 9 months post-intervention.

METHODS

A total of 66 nurses from a 14-bed intensive care unit of a Malaysian teaching hospital participated. The educational interventions included theoretical sessions, hands-on sedation assessment practice using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, and a brief sedation assessment tool. Nurses' sedation scoring and management abilities and perceived self-confidence level were assessed at both time points using self-administered questionnaires with case scenarios. Sedation assessment and management barriers were assessed once at 9 months post-intervention.

RESULTS

Median scores for overall accurate sedation scoring (9 months: 4·00; 3 months: 2·00, p = 0·0001) and overall sedation management (9 months: 14·0; 3 months: 7·0, p = 0·0001) were significantly higher at 9 months compared to 3 months post-intervention. There were no significant differences in the perceived self-confidence level for rating sedation level. Overall perceived barrier scores were low (M = 27·78, SD = 6·26, possible range = 11·0-55·0). Patient conditions (M = 3·68, SD = 1·13) and nurses' workload (M = 3·54, SD = 0·95) were the greatest barriers to effective sedation assessment and management. Demographic variables did not affect sedation scoring or management abilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive changes in nurses' sedation assessment and management abilities were observed, indicating that adequate hands-on clinical practice following educational interventions can improve nurses' knowledge and skills.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Educational initiatives are necessary to improve ICU practice, particularly in ICUs with inexperienced nurses.

摘要

背景

不恰当的镇静评估可能危及患者的舒适度和安全性。因此,护士在评估和管理镇静方面的能力对于机械通气患者的有效护理至关重要。

目的和目标

本研究评估了教育干预措施后作为主要结果的护士镇静评分和管理能力。护士对有效镇静管理的自我效能感和障碍也作为次要结果进行了评估。

设计

采用后测试仅准实验设计。数据在干预后 3 个月和 9 个月收集。

方法

共有来自马来西亚教学医院 14 张重症监护病房的 66 名护士参与了研究。教育干预措施包括理论课程、使用 Richmond 躁动镇静量表进行的镇静评估实践以及一个简短的镇静评估工具。在这两个时间点,使用包含案例场景的自我管理问卷评估护士的镇静评分和管理能力以及自我效能感水平。在干预后 9 个月仅评估一次镇静评估和管理障碍。

结果

总体准确镇静评分(9 个月:4.00;3 个月:2.00,p=0.0001)和总体镇静管理评分(9 个月:14.0;3 个月:7.0,p=0.0001)的中位数评分在干预后 9 个月明显高于 3 个月。在评定镇静水平的自我效能感方面,没有显著差异。总体感知障碍评分较低(M=27.78,SD=6.26,可能范围为 11.0-55.0)。患者状况(M=3.68,SD=1.13)和护士工作量(M=3.54,SD=0.95)是有效镇静评估和管理的最大障碍。人口统计学变量对镇静评分或管理能力没有影响。

结论

观察到护士镇静评估和管理能力的积极变化,表明教育干预后进行充分的临床实践可以提高护士的知识和技能。

临床相关性

教育计划对于改善 ICU 实践是必要的,特别是在 ICU 中护士经验不足的情况下。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验