Bhavadharini Balaji, Mahalakshmi Manni Mohanraj, Maheswari Kumar, Kalaiyarasi Gunasekaran, Anjana Ranjit Mohan, Deepa Mohan, Ranjani Harish, Priya Miranda, Uma Ram, Usha Sriram, Pastakia Sonak D, Malanda Belma, Belton Anne, Unnikrishnan Ranjit, Kayal Arivudainambi, Mohan Viswanathan
Madras Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for Non-communicable Diseases Prevention and Control, IDF Centre of Education, 4, Conran Smith Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai, 600 086, India.
Seethapathy Clinic and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Acta Diabetol. 2016 Feb;53(1):91-7. doi: 10.1007/s00592-015-0761-9. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
The aim of the study was to evaluate usefulness of capillary blood glucose (CBG) for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in resource-constrained settings where venous plasma glucose (VPG) estimations may be impossible.
Consecutive pregnant women (n = 1031) attending antenatal clinics in southern India underwent 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Fasting, 1- and 2-h VPG (AU2700 Beckman, Fullerton, CA) and CBG (One Touch Ultra-II, LifeScan) were simultaneously measured. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated for different CBG cut points using the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for the diagnosis of GDM as gold standard. Bland-Altman plots were drawn to look at the agreement between CBG and VPG. Correlation and regression equation analysis were also derived for CBG values.
Pearson's correlation between VPG and CBG for fasting was r = 0.433 [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.596, p < 0.001], for 1H, it was r = 0.653 (ICC = 0.776, p < 0.001), and for 2H, r = 0.784 (ICC = 0.834, p < 0.001). Comparing a single CBG 2-h cut point of 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/l) with the IADPSG criteria, the sensitivity and specificity were 62.3 and 80.7 %, respectively. If CBG cut points of 120 mg/dl (6.6 mmol/l) or 110 mg/dl (6.1 mmol/l) were used, the sensitivity improves to 78.3 and 92.5 %, respectively.
In settings where VPG estimations are not possible, CBG can be used as an initial screening test for GDM, using lower 2H CBG cut points to maximize the sensitivity. Those who screen positive can be referred to higher centers for definitive testing, using VPG.
本研究旨在评估在资源有限、无法进行静脉血浆葡萄糖(VPG)测定的情况下,毛细血管血糖(CBG)用于诊断妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的有效性。
印度南部产前诊所的连续孕妇(n = 1031)接受了75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。同时测量空腹、1小时和2小时的VPG(AU2700贝克曼,加利福尼亚州富勒顿)和CBG(One Touch Ultra-II,LifeScan)。以国际妊娠糖尿病研究组(IADPSG)的GDM诊断标准作为金标准,评估不同CBG切点的敏感性和特异性。绘制Bland-Altman图以观察CBG和VPG之间的一致性。还推导了CBG值的相关性和回归方程分析。
空腹时VPG与CBG的Pearson相关性为r = 0.433[组内相关系数(ICC)= 0.596,p <0.001],1小时时为r = 0.653(ICC = 0.776,p <0.001),2小时时为r = 0.784(ICC = 0.834,p <0.001)。将单一的2小时CBG切点140毫克/分升(7.8毫摩尔/升)与IADPSG标准进行比较,敏感性和特异性分别为62.3%和80.7%。如果使用120毫克/分升(6.6毫摩尔/升)或110毫克/分升(6.1毫摩尔/升)的CBG切点,敏感性分别提高到78.3%和92.5%。
在无法进行VPG测定的情况下,CBG可作为GDM的初始筛查试验,使用较低的2小时CBG切点以最大化敏感性。筛查呈阳性者可转诊至上级中心,采用VPG进行确诊检测。