School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, U.K.
Acc Chem Res. 2015 May 19;48(5):1485-93. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00042. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
The catalytic cross-coupling reactions of organic halides or related substrates with organometallic nucleophiles form the cornerstone of many carbon-carbon bond-forming processes. While palladium-based catalysts typically mediate such reactions, there are increasing concerns about the long-term sustainability of palladium in synthesis. This is due to the high cost of palladium, coupled with its low natural abundance, environmentally deleterious extraction (∼6 g of metal are produced per ton of ore), toxicity, and competition for its use from the automotive and consumer electronics sectors. Therefore, there is a growing interest in replacing palladium-based catalysts with those incorporating more earth-abundant elements. With its low cost, high natural abundance, and low toxicity, iron makes a particularly appealing alternative, and accordingly, the development of iron-catalyzed cross-coupling is undergoing explosive growth. However, our understanding of the mechanisms that underpin the iron-based catalytic cycles is still very much in its infancy. Mechanistic insight into catalytic reactions is not only academically important but also allows us to maximize the efficiency of processes or even to develop entirely new transformations. Key to the development of robust mechanistic models for cross-coupling is knowing the lowest oxidation state in the cycle. Once this is established, we can explore subsequent redox processes and build the catalytic manifold. Until we know with confidence what the lowest oxidation state is, any cycles proposed are largely just guesswork. To date, Fe(-II), Fe(-I), Fe(0), Fe(I), and Fe(II) have been proposed as contenders for the lowest-oxidation-state species in the cycle in iron-catalyzed cross-coupling; the aim of this Account is to pull together the various pieces of evidence in support, or otherwise, of each of these suggestions in turn. There currently exists no direct evidence that oxidation states below Fe(0) are active in the catalytic cycle. Meanwhile, the reactivity required of the lowest-oxidation-state species has been observed with model compounds in higher oxidation states, implying that there is no need to invoke such low oxidation states. While subzero-valent complexes do indeed act as effective precatalysts, it is important to recognize that this tells us that they are efficiently converted to an active catalyst but says nothing about the oxidation states of the species in the catalytic cycle. Zero-valent heterogeneous iron nanoparticles can be formed under typical catalytic conditions, but there is no evidence to suggest that homogeneous Fe(0) complexes can be produced under comparable conditions. It seems likely that the zero-valent nanoparticles act as a reservoir for soluble higher-oxidation-state species. Fe(II) complexes can certainly be formed under catalytically relevant conditions, and when bulky nucleophilic coupling partners are exploited, potential intermediates can be isolated. However, the bulky reagents act as poor proxies for most nucleophiles used in cross-coupling, as they give Fe(II) organometallic intermediates that are kinetically stabilized with respect to reductive elimination. When more realistic substrates are exploited, reduction or disproportionation to Fe(I) is widely observed, and while it still has not been conclusively proved, this oxidation state currently represents a likely candidate for the lowest one active in many iron-catalyzed cross-coupling processes.
有机卤化物或相关底物与有机金属亲核试剂的催化交叉偶联反应构成了许多碳-碳键形成过程的基础。虽然钯基催化剂通常介导此类反应,但人们越来越关注钯在合成中的长期可持续性。这是由于钯的成本高,加上其天然丰度低、环境有害的提取(每吨矿石生产约 6 克金属)、毒性以及汽车和消费电子产品领域对其使用的竞争。因此,人们越来越感兴趣的是用更丰富的地球元素取代钯基催化剂。铁具有成本低、天然丰度高、毒性低的特点,是一种特别有吸引力的替代品,因此,铁催化交叉偶联的发展正在蓬勃发展。然而,我们对支撑基于铁的催化循环的机制的理解仍处于起步阶段。对催化反应的机理理解不仅在学术上很重要,而且还可以使我们最大限度地提高过程的效率,甚至开发全新的转化。为交叉偶联开发稳健的机理模型的关键是知道循环中的最低氧化态。一旦确定了这一点,我们就可以探索后续的氧化还原过程并构建催化歧管。在我们有信心确定最低氧化态是什么之前,任何提出的循环在很大程度上都只是猜测。迄今为止,Fe(-II)、Fe(-I)、Fe(0)、Fe(I)和 Fe(II)已被提议作为铁催化交叉偶联中循环中最低氧化态物种的候选者;本综述的目的是依次将支持或不支持每种建议的各种证据汇集在一起。目前没有直接证据表明低于 Fe(0)的氧化态在催化循环中是活性的。同时,在更高的氧化态下,已经观察到模型化合物中所需的最低氧化态物种的反应性,这意味着不需要引入如此低的氧化态。虽然亚零价配合物确实可以作为有效的前催化剂,但重要的是要认识到,这告诉我们它们可以有效地转化为活性催化剂,但并没有说明催化循环中物种的氧化态。在典型的催化条件下可以形成零价的多相铁纳米粒子,但没有证据表明在可比条件下可以生成均相 Fe(0)配合物。零价纳米粒子似乎很可能充当可溶性高氧化态物种的储库。在催化相关条件下当然可以形成 Fe(II)配合物,并且当利用庞大的亲核偶联试剂时,可以分离出潜在的中间体。然而,对于在交叉偶联中使用的大多数亲核试剂,庞大的试剂充当较差的类似物,因为它们给出了相对于还原消除而动力学稳定的 Fe(II)有机金属中间体。当利用更现实的底物时,广泛观察到还原或歧化至 Fe(I),尽管尚未得到结论性证明,但这种氧化态目前是许多铁催化交叉偶联过程中活性最低的一种的可能候选物。