Aguilera Maria Camila, Gogoi Achyut Ranjan, Lee Wes, Liu Lei, Brennessel William W, Gutierrez Osvaldo, Neidig Michael L
Department of Chemistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, United States.
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
ACS Catal. 2023 Jun 22;13(13):8987-8996. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c02008. eCollection 2023 Jul 7.
Iron-bisphosphines have attracted broad interest as highly effective and versatile catalytic systems for two- and three-component cross-coupling strategies. While recent mechanistic studies have defined the role of organoiron(II)-bisphosphine species as key intermediates for selective cross-coupled product formation in these systems, mechanistic features that are essential for catalytic performance remain undefined. Specifically, key questions include the following: what is the generality of iron(II) intermediates for radical initiation in cross-couplings? What factors control reactivity toward homocoupled biaryl side-products in these systems? Finally, what are the solvent effects in these reactions that enable high catalytic performance? Herein, we address these key questions by examining the mechanism of enantioselective coupling between α-chloro- and α-bromoalkanoates and aryl Grignard reagents catalyzed by chiral bisphosphine-iron complexes. By employing freeze-trapped Fe Mössbauer and EPR studies combined with inorganic synthesis, X-ray crystallography, reactivity studies, and quantum mechanical calculations, we define the key in situ iron speciation as well as their catalytic roles. In contrast to iron-SciOPP aryl-alkyl couplings, where monophenylated species were found to be the predominant reactive intermediate or prior proposals of reduced iron species to initiate catalysis, the enantioselective system utilizes an iron(II)-(,)-BenzP* bisphenylated intermediate to initiate the catalytic cycle. A profound consequence of this radical initiation process is that halogen abstraction and subsequent reductive elimination result in considerable amounts of biphenyl side products, limiting the efficiency of this method. Overall, this study offers key insights into the broader role of iron(II)-bisphosphine species for radical initiation, factors contributing to biphenyl side product generation, and protocol effects (solvent, Grignard reagent addition rate) that are critical to minimizing biphenyl generation to obtain more selective cross-coupling methods.
铁双膦作为用于双组分和三组分交叉偶联策略的高效且通用的催化体系,已引起广泛关注。虽然最近的机理研究已确定有机铁(II)-双膦物种在这些体系中作为选择性交叉偶联产物形成的关键中间体的作用,但对于催化性能至关重要的机理特征仍未明确。具体而言,关键问题包括:铁(II)中间体在交叉偶联中引发自由基的普遍性如何?哪些因素控制这些体系中对均偶联联苯副产物的反应性?最后,这些反应中的溶剂效应是什么,从而实现高催化性能?在此,我们通过研究手性双膦-铁配合物催化的α-氯代和α-溴代链烷酸酯与芳基格氏试剂之间的对映选择性偶联机理来解决这些关键问题。通过采用冷冻捕集的Fe穆斯堡尔谱和电子顺磁共振研究,并结合无机合成、X射线晶体学、反应性研究和量子力学计算,我们确定了关键的原位铁物种及其催化作用。与铁-SciOPP芳基-烷基偶联不同,在铁-SciOPP芳基-烷基偶联中,单苯基化物种被发现是主要的反应中间体,或者之前有关于还原铁物种引发催化的提议,而对映选择性体系利用铁(II)-(,)-BenzP*双苯基化中间体来引发催化循环。这种自由基引发过程的一个深远后果是,卤素夺取和随后的还原消除会产生大量的联苯副产物,限制了该方法的效率。总体而言,本研究为铁(II)-双膦物种在自由基引发中的更广泛作用、导致联苯副产物生成的因素以及对于最小化联苯生成以获得更具选择性的交叉偶联方法至关重要的方案效应(溶剂、格氏试剂添加速率)提供了关键见解。