McCarthy Margaret M, Pickett Lindsay A, VanRyzin Jonathan W, Kight Katherine E
Department of Pharmacology, Program in Neuroscience and Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Department of Pharmacology, Program in Neuroscience and Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Horm Behav. 2015 Nov;76:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
This article is part of a Special Issue "SBN 2014". Discerning the biologic origins of neuroanatomical sex differences has been of interest since they were first reported in the late 60's and early 70's. The centrality of gonadal hormone exposure during a developmental critical window cannot be denied but hormones are indirect agents of change, acting to induce gene transcription or modulate membrane bound signaling cascades. Sex differences in the brain include regional volume differences due to differential cell death, neuronal and glial genesis, dendritic branching and synaptic patterning. Early emphasis on mechanism therefore focused on neurotransmitters and neural growth factors, but by and large these endpoints failed to explain the origins of neural sex differences. More recently evidence has accumulated in favor of inflammatory mediators and immune cells as principle regulators of brain sexual differentiation and reveal that the establishment of dimorphic circuits is not cell autonomous but instead requires extensive cell-to-cell communication including cells of non-neuronal origin. Despite the multiplicity of cells involved the nature of the sex differences in the neuroanatomical endpoints suggests canalization, a process that explains the robustness of individuals in the face of intrinsic and extrinsic variability. We propose that some neuroanatomical endpoints are canalized to enhance sex differences in the brain by reducing variability within one sex while also preventing the sexes from diverging too greatly. We further propose mechanisms by which such canalization could occur and discuss what relevance this may have to sex differences in behavior.
本文是“2014年生物网络研讨会”特刊的一部分。自60年代末和70年代初首次报道神经解剖学上的性别差异以来,探究其生物学起源一直备受关注。性腺激素在发育关键期的暴露至关重要,这一点无可否认,但激素是间接的变化因子,作用于诱导基因转录或调节膜结合信号级联反应。大脑中的性别差异包括因细胞死亡、神经元和神经胶质细胞生成、树突分支和突触模式不同而导致的区域体积差异。因此,早期对机制的关注集中在神经递质和神经生长因子上,但总体而言,这些终点未能解释神经性别差异的起源。最近,越来越多的证据支持炎症介质和免疫细胞作为大脑性别分化的主要调节因子,并表明双态回路的建立并非细胞自主进行,而是需要广泛的细胞间通讯,包括非神经元来源的细胞。尽管涉及多种细胞,但神经解剖学终点上的性别差异性质表明存在一种定向分化过程,该过程解释了个体面对内在和外在变异性时的稳健性。我们提出,一些神经解剖学终点通过减少同一性别内的变异性,同时防止两性差异过大,从而实现定向分化以增强大脑中的性别差异。我们进一步提出了这种定向分化可能发生的机制,并讨论了这与行为上的性别差异可能有何关联。