• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国对临终者的护理正在改善吗?

Is Care for the Dying Improving in the United States?

作者信息

Teno Joan M, Freedman Vicki A, Kasper Judith D, Gozalo Pedro, Mor Vincent

机构信息

1 Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health , Providence, Rhode Island.

2 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2015 Aug;18(8):662-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0039. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2015.0039
PMID:25922970
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4532900/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Striking changes occurred in health care in the United States between 2000 and 2013, including growth of hospice and hospital-based palliative care teams, and changes in Medicare payment policies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare informants' reports and ratings of the quality of end-of-life care for decedents between 2000 and 2011-2013.

METHODS

The study design comprised retrospective national surveys. Subjects were decedents age 65 years and older residing in the community from two time periods. Similar survey questions were asked at the two time periods. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted, using appropriate survey weights to examine response differences between time periods, after adjusting for the decedent's age, race, pattern of functional decline, and the presence of a cancer diagnosis, as well as the respondent's relationship to the decedent.

RESULTS

A total of 1208 informants were interviewed; 622 in 2000 and 586 in 2011-2013. Respondents from deaths in 2011-2013 were more likely to state that their loved ones experienced an unmet need for pain management (25.2% versus 15.5% in 2000, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.3). More respondents reported that religion and spirituality were addressed in the later time period (72.4% not addressed compared with 58.3%, AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9). High rates of unmet need for palliation of dyspnea and anxiety/depression remained. The overall rating of quality did not improve but decreased (with 56.7% stating care was excellent in 2000 and 47.0% in the later survey, AOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial unmet needs in end-of-life care remain. Continued efforts are needed to improve the quality of end-of-life care.

摘要

背景

2000年至2013年间,美国医疗保健领域发生了显著变化,包括临终关怀和医院姑息治疗团队的发展,以及医疗保险支付政策的变化。

目的

本研究旨在比较2000年至2011 - 2013年间信息提供者对死者临终关怀质量的报告和评级。

方法

研究设计包括回顾性全国调查。研究对象为两个时间段居住在社区的65岁及以上死者。两个时间段询问了相似的调查问题。进行了双变量和多变量分析,使用适当的调查权重来检验时间段之间的反应差异,同时调整死者的年龄、种族、功能衰退模式、癌症诊断情况,以及受访者与死者的关系。

结果

共采访了1208名信息提供者;2000年622名,2011 - 2013年586名。2011 - 2013年死亡案例的受访者更有可能表示他们所爱的人在疼痛管理方面存在未满足的需求(25.2%对2000年的15.5%,调整后比值比[AOR]为1.9,95%置信区间[CI]为1.1 - 3.3)。更多受访者报告称在后期时间段宗教和精神需求得到了关注(未得到关注的比例为72.4%,而2000年为58.3%,AOR为1.4,95% CI为1.1 - 1.9)。呼吸困难和焦虑/抑郁缓解方面未满足需求的比例仍然很高。总体质量评级没有提高反而下降(2000年称护理优秀的比例为56.7%,后期调查为47.0%,AOR为0.70,95% CI为0.52 - 0.95)。

结论

临终关怀中仍存在大量未满足的需求。需要持续努力提高临终关怀的质量。

相似文献

1
Is Care for the Dying Improving in the United States?美国对临终者的护理正在改善吗?
J Palliat Med. 2015 Aug;18(8):662-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0039. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
2
Late Transitions and Bereaved Family Member Perceptions of Quality of End-of-Life Care.晚期转变和失去亲人的家庭成员对临终关怀质量的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Sep;66(9):1730-1736. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15455. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
3
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.家属对临终关怀最后场所的看法。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.
4
Does hospice improve quality of care for persons dying from dementia?临终关怀是否能提高痴呆患者的护理质量?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Aug;59(8):1531-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03505.x. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
5
Out-of-hospital death: advance care planning, decedent symptoms, and caregiver burden.院外死亡:预先护理计划、死者症状及照料者负担
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):532-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52158.x.
6
Trends in inpatient treatment intensity among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life.临终时医疗保险受益人的住院治疗强度趋势。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Apr;39(2):363-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00232.x.
7
New paths in end-of-life care.临终关怀的新途径。
Health Prog. 1998 May-Jun;79(3):18-20.
8
Nursing home and end-of-life care in Parkinson disease.帕金森病的养老院及临终关怀
Neurology. 2015 Aug 4;85(5):413-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001715. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
9
End-of-life care in U.S. nursing homes: nursing homes with special programs and trained staff for hospice or palliative/end-of-life care.美国养老院的临终关怀:设有临终关怀或姑息治疗/临终关怀特别项目且配备经过培训的工作人员的养老院。
J Palliat Med. 2008 Jul;11(6):866-77. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0278.
10
Changes in Medicare costs with the growth of hospice care in nursing homes.随着疗养院临终关怀服务的发展,医疗保险费用的变化。
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1823-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1408705.

引用本文的文献

1
Peaceful dying among Canada's elderly: An analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.加拿大老年人的安详离世:对加拿大老龄化纵向研究的分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0317014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317014. eCollection 2025.
2
Better end-of-life care in surgical patients: Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey - a qualitative analysis.改善外科患者的临终关怀:退伍军人事务部丧亲家庭调查——一项定性分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):270-280. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004873.
3
Medicare-Covered Services Near the End of Life in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare.医疗保险覆盖的在医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险中接近生命终点的服务。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jul 5;5(7):e241777. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1777.
4
Trends in End-of-Life Care and Satisfaction Among Veterans Undergoing Surgery.接受手术的退伍军人临终关怀与满意度趋势
Ann Surg. 2025 Apr 1;281(4):682-688. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006253. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
5
Bundle of care to drive improvements in palliative and end-of-life care (PEOLC) in an acute tertiary hospital.关怀捆绑以改善急性三级医院的姑息治疗和临终关怀(PEOLC)。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002358.
6
Individual Socioeconomic Factors Have a Greater Impact on End-of-Life Care Outcomes Than Regional Factors.个体社会经济因素对临终关怀结局的影响大于区域因素。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Feb;27(2):160-167. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0163. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
7
The quality of end-of-life care for Danish cancer patients who have received non-specialized palliative care: a national survey using the Danish version of VOICES-SF.丹麦非专科姑息治疗癌症患者的临终关怀质量:使用丹麦版 VOICES-SF 的全国性调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9507-9516. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07302-0. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
8
ProPACC: Protocol for a Trial of Integrated Specialty Palliative Care for Critically Ill Older Adults.ProPACC:一项针对危重症老年患者综合专科姑息治疗的试验方案。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):e601-e610. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.344.
9
Team-Based Hospice Referrals: A Potential Quality Metric for Lung Cancer in the Immunotherapy Era.基于团队的临终关怀转诊:免疫治疗时代肺癌的一项潜在质量指标。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jan;40(1):10-17. doi: 10.1177/10499091221091745. Epub 2022 May 5.
10
Does it Matter Who Decides? Outcomes of Surrogate Decision-Making for Community-Dwelling, Cognitively Impaired Older Adults Near the End of Life.谁来做决策重要吗?接近生命终点的认知障碍的社区居住的老年患者的代理决策结果。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Dec;62(6):1126-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptom trends in the last year of life from 1998 to 2010: a cohort study.1998年至2010年生命最后一年的症状趋势:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):175-83. doi: 10.7326/M13-1609.
2
Length of home hospice care, family-perceived timing of referrals, perceived quality of care, and quality of death and dying in terminally ill cancer patients who died at home.在家中去世的晚期癌症患者的家庭临终关怀护理时长、家属认为的转诊时机、感知到的护理质量以及死亡和临终质量。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Feb;23(2):491-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2397-7. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
3
A statewide survey of adult and pediatric outpatient palliative care services.一项针对成人和儿科门诊姑息治疗服务的全州范围调查。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Dec;17(12):1311-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0144.
4
Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009.2000 年、2005 年和 2009 年 Medicare 受益人生死地点、护理地点和医疗保健转归的变化。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 6;309(5):470-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.207624.
5
Community-based palliative care: the natural evolution for palliative care delivery in the U.S.社区为基础的姑息治疗:美国姑息治疗提供的自然演变
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):254-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
6
It is "too late" or is it? Bereaved family member perceptions of hospice referral when their family member was on hospice for seven days or less.当患者在临终关怀机构接受治疗的时间不足七天时,其家属对临终关怀转诊的看法:为时已晚还是为时未晚?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Apr;43(4):732-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.05.012. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
7
Vigilant at the end of life: family advocacy in the nursing home.临终关怀:养老院中的家庭倡导。
J Palliat Med. 2010 May;13(5):573-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0398.
8
Length of hospice enrollment and subsequent depression in family caregivers: 13-month follow-up study.临终关怀注册时长与家庭照顾者随后出现的抑郁:13个月随访研究
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;14(3):264-9. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000194642.86116.ce.
9
Interventions to enhance communication among patients, providers, and families.加强患者、医疗服务提供者和家庭之间沟通的干预措施。
J Palliat Med. 2005;8 Suppl 1:S95-102. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.s-95.
10
The growth of palliative care programs in United States hospitals.美国医院姑息治疗项目的发展。
J Palliat Med. 2005 Dec;8(6):1127-34. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.1127.