Glasser Allison M, Cobb Caroline O, Teplitskaya Lyubov, Ganz Ollie, Katz Lauren, Rose Shyanika W, Feirman Shari, Villanti Andrea C
The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Legacy, Washington, DC, USA.
The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Legacy, Washington, DC, USA Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 29;5(4):e007688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007688.
E-cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have recently attracted considerable attention. Among some individuals there is strong debate and a polarisation of views about the public health benefits versus harms of ENDS. With little regulation, the ENDS market is evolving, and new products are introduced and marketed constantly. Rapid developments in manufacturing, marketing and consumer domains related to ENDS will warrant frequent re-evaluation, based on the state of the evolving science. The purpose of this article is to describe a protocol for an ongoing comprehensive review of the published scientific literature on ENDS.
We will undertake a systematic review of published empirical research literature on ENDS using the National Library of Medicine's PubMed electronic database to search for relevant articles. Data from included studies will be extracted into a standardised form, tables with study details and key outcomes for each article will be created, and studies will be synthesised qualitatively.
This review synthesises published literature and presents no primary data. Therefore, no ethical approval is required for this study. Subsequent papers will provide greater detail on results, within select categories, that represent gaps in the literature base.
电子烟或电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)最近引起了广泛关注。在一些人当中,对于ENDS对公众健康的益处与危害存在激烈辩论且观点两极分化。由于监管较少,ENDS市场不断演变,新产品持续推出并上市销售。与ENDS相关的制造、营销和消费领域的快速发展,将需要基于不断发展的科学状况进行频繁重新评估。本文旨在描述一项正在进行的对已发表的关于ENDS的科学文献进行全面综述的方案。
我们将使用美国国立医学图书馆的PubMed电子数据库,对已发表的关于ENDS的实证研究文献进行系统综述,以搜索相关文章。纳入研究的数据将被提取为标准化形式,为每篇文章创建包含研究细节和关键结果的表格,并对研究进行定性综合分析。
本综述综合了已发表的文献,未呈现原始数据。因此,本研究无需伦理批准。后续论文将在选定类别中更详细地阐述结果,这些类别代表了文献基础中的空白。