Karakaya M Arif, Koç Okay, Ekiz Feza, Ağaçhan A Feran
Department of General Surgery, Forensic Medicine Institute, İstanbul, Turkey.
Clinic of Gastroenterology Surgery, Diyarbakır Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Dec 1;30(4):211-3. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2014.2753. eCollection 2014.
The aim was to evaluate the parameters that were considered by Forensic Medicine in bile duct injury as well as the issues that the physicians were found to be faulty.
The following parameters were investigated in 21 files that were referred to Istanbul Forensic Medicine Institute with request of expert opinion between 2008-2012; expert decisions, patient's age, gender, written patient consent, diagnosis, type of first surgery, surgical complications, timing of complication diagnosis within the scope of complication management, patient's referral timing, troubleshooting procedures and mortality rate.
Physicians were found to be faulty in all files. The reason for physician fault was failure to show the necessary professional care and attention in one (4.7%) file, late recognition of injury and late transfer of the patient in 20 (95.3%) files. Written consent had not been obtained in any of the files. Thirteen patients were female (61.9%) and 8 (30.1%) were male, with a mean age of 43.3 years. Nineteen patients had cholelithiasis (90.4%), and two patients (9.5%) had a mass in the head of the pancreas. Cholecystectomy was performed laparoscopically in 15 patients (78.9%), and with open surgery in 4 patients (21.1%). The Whipple procedure was performed in two patients. The diagnosis was made during the operation in one patient (4.7%), and in the post-operative period in 20 patients (95.3%). The time to diagnosis after surgery was between 3-6 days. All of the patients had been referred to third level health care facilities. The timing of transfer was 1 day in the patient who was diagnosed during the operation, and ranged between 4-10 days in those who were diagnosed postoperatively. Reasons for late referral were delays related to pending test results in 12 patients, vague signs in 3 patients, and following-up patients with the thought that the biliary fistula will heal by itself in 5 patients. Mortality was not observed in any of the examined files.
The issues where physicians were most frequently found to be faulty were failure to obtain written patient consent, late recognition of injury and late transfer of the patient.
旨在评估法医在胆管损伤中所考虑的参数以及发现医生存在失误的问题。
对2008年至2012年间提交至伊斯坦布尔法医研究所并请求专家意见的21份档案中的以下参数进行了调查;专家决定、患者年龄、性别、患者书面同意书、诊断、首次手术类型、手术并发症、并发症管理范围内并发症诊断的时间、患者转诊时间、故障排除程序和死亡率。
在所有档案中均发现医生存在失误。医生失误的原因是在1份档案中未表现出必要的专业护理和关注(4.7%),在20份档案中损伤识别延迟和患者转诊延迟(95.3%)。所有档案中均未获得书面同意书。13名患者为女性(61.9%),8名患者为男性(30.1%),平均年龄为43.3岁。19名患者患有胆结石(90.4%),2名患者(9.5%)胰腺头部有肿块。15名患者(78.9%)进行了腹腔镜胆囊切除术,4名患者(21.1%)进行了开放手术。2名患者进行了惠普尔手术。1名患者(4.7%)在手术期间确诊,20名患者(95.3%)在术后确诊。术后诊断时间为3至6天。所有患者均被转诊至三级医疗机构。手术期间确诊的患者转诊时间为1天,术后确诊的患者转诊时间为4至10天。转诊延迟的原因是12名患者与等待检查结果有关,3名患者体征不明确,5名患者认为胆瘘会自行愈合而对患者进行随访。在所检查的任何档案中均未观察到死亡情况。
医生最常被发现失误的问题是未获得患者书面同意、损伤识别延迟和患者转诊延迟。