Lemming Dag, Börsbo Björn, Sjörs Anna, Lind Eva-Britt, Arendt-Nielsen Lars, Graven-Nielsen Thomas, Gerdle Björn
Department of Pain and Rehabilitation Center and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2015 May 1;10(5):e0125432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125432. eCollection 2015.
Exercise is often used for pain rehabilitation but the link between physical activity level and pain sensitivity is still not fully understood. Pressure pain sensitivity to cuff algometry and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) were evaluated in highly active men (n=22), normally active men (n=26), highly active women (n=27) and normally active women (n=23) based on the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire. Cuff pressure pain sensitivity was assessed at the arm and lower leg. The subjects scored the pain intensity on an electronic Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during ten minutes with 25 kPa constant cuff pressure and two minutes with zero pressure. The maximal VAS score and area under the VAS-curve were extracted. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were recorded by manual pressure algometry on the ipsilateral tibialis anterior muscle before, during and after the tonic arm stimulation. Tonic cuff stimulation of the arm and leg resulted in higher VAS peak scores in women compared with men (p<0.04). In all groups the PPTs were reduced during and after the cuff stimulation compared with baseline (p=0.001). PPT were higher in men compared with women (p=0.03) and higher in highly physical active compared with normal active (p=0.048). Besides the well-known gender difference in pressure pain sensitivity this study demonstrates that a high physical fitness degree in non-athletic subjects is associated with increased pressure pain thresholds but does not affect cuff pressure pain sensitivity in healthy people.
运动常被用于疼痛康复,但身体活动水平与疼痛敏感性之间的联系仍未被完全理解。基于戈丁休闲时间运动问卷,对高活动水平男性(n = 22)、正常活动水平男性(n = 26)、高活动水平女性(n = 27)和正常活动水平女性(n = 23)的袖带压力痛觉测定和条件性疼痛调制(CPM)的压力疼痛敏感性进行了评估。在手臂和小腿处评估袖带压力疼痛敏感性。受试者在25 kPa恒定袖带压力下10分钟以及零压力下2分钟内,通过电子视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛强度进行评分。提取最大VAS评分和VAS曲线下面积。在持续性手臂刺激之前、期间和之后,通过手动压力痛觉测定法记录同侧胫骨前肌的压力疼痛阈值(PPT)。与男性相比,手臂和腿部的持续性袖带刺激导致女性的VAS峰值评分更高(p < 0.04)。在所有组中,与基线相比,袖带刺激期间和之后PPT均降低(p = 0.001)。男性的PPT高于女性(p = 0.03),高体力活动者的PPT高于正常活动者(p = 0.048)。除了众所周知的压力疼痛敏感性的性别差异外,本研究表明,非运动员受试者的高体能程度与压力疼痛阈值升高相关,但不影响健康人的袖带压力疼痛敏感性。