• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I-RREACH:一种用于提高研究人员、组织和社区在复杂干预措施中实施准备程度的参与和评估工具。

I-RREACH: an engagement and assessment tool for improving implementation readiness of researchers, organizations and communities in complex interventions.

作者信息

Maar Marion, Yeates Karen, Barron Marcia, Hua Diane, Liu Peter, Moy Lum-Kwong Margaret, Perkins Nancy, Sleeth Jessica, Tobe Joshua, Wabano Mary Jo, Williamson Pamela, Tobe Sheldon W

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.

Department of Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2015 May 4;10:64. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0257-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-015-0257-6
PMID:25935849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4424962/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-communicable chronic diseases are the leading causes of mortality globally, and nearly 80% of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In high-income countries (HICs), inequitable distribution of resources affects poorer and otherwise disadvantaged groups including Aboriginal peoples. Cardiovascular mortality in high-income countries has recently begun to fall; however, these improvements are not realized among citizens in LMICs or those subgroups in high-income countries who are disadvantaged in the social determinants of health including Aboriginal people. It is critical to develop multi-faceted, affordable and realistic health interventions in collaboration with groups who experience health inequalities. Based on community-based participatory research (CBPR), we aimed to develop implementation tools to guide complex interventions to ensure that health gains can be realized in low-resource environments.

METHODS

We developed the I-RREACH (Intervention and Research Readiness Engagement and Assessment of Community Health Care) tool to guide implementation of interventions in low-resource environments. We employed CBPR and a consensus methodology to (1) develop the theoretical basis of the tool and (2) to identify key implementation factor domains; then, we (3) collected participant evaluation data to validate the tool during implementation.

RESULTS

The I-RREACH tool was successfully developed using a community-based consensus method and is rooted in participatory principles, equalizing the importance of the knowledge and perspectives of researchers and community stakeholders while encouraging respectful dialogue. The I-RREACH tool consists of three phases: fact finding, stakeholder dialogue and community member/patient dialogue. The evaluation for our first implementation of I-RREACH by participants was overwhelmingly positive, with 95% or more of participants indicating comfort with and support for the process and the dialogue it creates.

CONCLUSIONS

The I-RREACH tool was designed to (1) pinpoint key domains required for dialogue between the community and the research team to facilitate implementation of complex health interventions and research projects and (2) to identify existing strengths and areas requiring further development for effective implementation. I-RREACH has been found to be easily adaptable to diverse geographical and cultural settings and can be further adapted to other complex interventions. Further research should include the potential use of the I-RREACH tool in the development of blue prints for scale-up of successful interventions, particularly in low-resource environments.

摘要

背景

非传染性慢性病是全球主要死因,其中近80%的死亡发生在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。在高收入国家(HICs),资源分配不均影响到包括原住民在内的较贫困及其他弱势群体。高收入国家的心血管疾病死亡率最近开始下降;然而,在低收入和中等收入国家的公民或高收入国家中在健康社会决定因素方面处于不利地位的亚群体(包括原住民)中,这些改善并未实现。与经历健康不平等的群体合作制定多方面、负担得起且切实可行的健康干预措施至关重要。基于社区参与式研究(CBPR),我们旨在开发实施工具,以指导复杂干预措施,确保在资源匮乏的环境中实现健康收益。

方法

我们开发了I-RREACH(社区医疗保健干预与研究准备参与及评估)工具,以指导在资源匮乏环境中实施干预措施。我们采用CBPR和共识方法来(1)建立该工具的理论基础,以及(2)确定关键实施因素领域;然后,我们(3)收集参与者评估数据,以便在实施过程中验证该工具。

结果

I-RREACH工具通过基于社区的共识方法成功开发,其植根于参与性原则,平衡了研究人员和社区利益相关者的知识和观点的重要性,同时鼓励进行尊重性对话。I-RREACH工具包括三个阶段:实情调查、利益相关者对话和社区成员/患者对话。参与者对我们首次实施I-RREACH的评价绝大多数是积极的,95%或更多的参与者表示对该过程及其所促成的对话感到满意并给予支持。

结论

I-RREACH工具旨在(1)确定社区与研究团队之间对话所需的关键领域,以促进复杂健康干预措施和研究项目的实施,以及(2)识别现有优势和需要进一步发展以实现有效实施的领域。已发现I-RREACH易于适应不同的地理和文化环境,并且可以进一步适用于其他复杂干预措施。进一步的研究应包括I-RREACH工具在制定成功干预措施扩大规模蓝图方面的潜在用途,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e10/4424962/bf3ca79342c0/13012_2015_257_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e10/4424962/bf3ca79342c0/13012_2015_257_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e10/4424962/bf3ca79342c0/13012_2015_257_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
I-RREACH: an engagement and assessment tool for improving implementation readiness of researchers, organizations and communities in complex interventions.I-RREACH:一种用于提高研究人员、组织和社区在复杂干预措施中实施准备程度的参与和评估工具。
Implement Sci. 2015 May 4;10:64. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0257-6.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Tuberculosis结核病
5
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
6
A community based participatory approach to improving health in a Hispanic population.以社区为基础的参与式方法改善西班牙裔人群的健康状况。
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 11;6:38. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-38.
7
A Framework for the Study of Complex mHealth Interventions in Diverse Cultural Settings.在多元文化背景下研究复杂移动健康干预措施的框架
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Apr 20;5(4):e47. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7044.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Community-based participatory research and user-centered design in a diabetes medication information and decision tool.糖尿病药物信息与决策工具中的社区参与式研究及以用户为中心的设计
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Summer;7(2):171-84. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0024.
10
The influence of community factors in the implementation of community-based interventions to improve antenatal care: a qualitative study based on the IMCHA programme in Tanzania.社区因素对实施以社区为基础的干预措施以改善产前保健的影响:基于坦桑尼亚 IMCHA 项目的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 Sep 22;18(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01225-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Working group engagement as a precondition of successful community engagement in an expert-led social marketing public health intervention: Learning from the footprints.作为专家主导的社会营销公共卫生干预中社区成功参与前提条件的工作组参与:从足迹中学习。
Can J Public Health. 2025 Mar 14. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01011-x.
2
Modifications of the readiness assessment for pragmatic trials tool for appropriate use with Indigenous populations.适用于原住民人群的实用临床试验准备评估工具的修改。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 May 31;24(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02244-z.
3
Bridging community and clinic through digital health: Community-based adaptation of a mobile phone-based heart failure program for remote communities in Uganda.

本文引用的文献

1
The blood pressure and hypertension experience among North American Indigenous populations.北美原住民的血压与高血压情况
J Hypertens. 2014 Apr;32(4):724-34. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000084.
2
Disseminating research in rural Yup'ik communities: challenges and ethical considerations in moving from discovery to intervention development.在育空河皮克族农村社区传播研究成果:从发现到干预发展过程中的挑战与伦理考量
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2013 Aug 5;72. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v72i0.20958. eCollection 2013.
3
Outcome of acute peritoneal dialysis in northern Tanzania.
通过数字健康连接社区与诊所:针对乌干达偏远社区对基于手机的心力衰竭项目进行基于社区的调整。
BMC Digit Health. 2023;1(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s44247-023-00020-5. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
Advancing health equity for Indigenous peoples in Canada: development of a patient complexity assessment framework.推进加拿大原住民健康公平:患者复杂性评估框架的制定。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 29;25(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02362-z.
5
Heart Health Begins With Community: Community-Based Research Exploring Innovative Strategies to Support First Nations Heart Health.心脏健康始于社区:基于社区的研究探索支持原住民心脏健康的创新策略。
CJC Open. 2023 Jul 1;5(9):661-670. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.06.006. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review.社区参与传播与实施模式:一项叙述性综述。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Feb 1;2:2633489520985305. doi: 10.1177/2633489520985305. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review.评估卫生创新可扩展性的工具:系统评价。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 24;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00830-5.
8
Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review.测量社区参与式研究的背景、过程和结果:一个映射综述。
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):493-553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool: A decision support tool for health policy makers and implementers.干预可扩展性评估工具:为卫生政策制定者和实施者提供决策支持的工具。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jan 3;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0494-2.
10
Analysis of the Implementation, User Perspectives, and Feedback From a Mobile Health Intervention for Individuals Living With Hypertension (DREAM-GLOBAL): Mixed Methods Study.分析一项针对高血压患者的移动健康干预措施的实施情况、用户观点和反馈(DREAM-GLOBAL):混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Dec 9;7(12):e12639. doi: 10.2196/12639.
坦桑尼亚北部急性腹膜透析的结果。
Perit Dial Int. 2012 May-Jun;32(3):261-6. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00083.
4
The dynamics of the relationship between diabetes incidence and low income: longitudinal results from Canada's National Population Health Survey.糖尿病发病率与低收入之间关系的动态变化:来自加拿大全国人口健康调查的纵向结果。
Maturitas. 2012 Jul;72(3):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.017. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
5
Thinking outside the box: Aboriginal people's suggestions for conducting health studies with Aboriginal communities.跳出固有思维:原住民对在原住民社区开展健康研究的建议。
Public Health. 2011 Nov;125(11):747-53. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.08.006.
6
Harmonization of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease: the C-CHANGE Initiative.心血管疾病防治指南的协调统一:C-CHANGE倡议
CMAJ. 2011 Oct 18;183(15):E1135-50. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101508. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
7
Advancing the science of community-level interventions.推进社区层面干预措施的科学研究。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):1410-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300113. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
8
Changes in the rates of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Canada over the past two decades.过去二十年来加拿大高血压知晓率、治疗率和控制率的变化。
CMAJ. 2011 Jun 14;183(9):1007-13. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101767. Epub 2011 May 16.
9
Mortality of urban Aboriginal adults in Canada, 1991-2001.1991 - 2001年加拿大城市原住民成年人的死亡率。
Chronic Dis Can. 2010 Dec;31(1):4-21.
10
Chronic diseases and mortality in Canadian Aboriginal peoples: learning from the knowledge.加拿大原住民的慢性病与死亡率:从知识中学习
Chronic Dis Can. 2010 Dec;31(1):2-3.