• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Students' understanding of "Women-Centred Care Philosophy" in midwifery care through Continuity of Care (CoC) learning model: a quasi-experimental study.通过连续护理(CoC)学习模式,学生对助产护理中“以妇女为中心的护理理念”的理解:一项准实验研究。
BMC Nurs. 2015 Apr 22;14:22. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0072-z. eCollection 2015.
2
Two parts of an indivisible whole - Midwifery education and feminism: An exploratory study of 1st year students' immersion into midwifery.助产士教育与女权主义:不可分割整体的两个部分——对一年级学生融入助产士专业情况的探索性研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Dec;119:105589. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105589. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
3
Midwifery students' experiences of working within a midwifery caseload model.助产专业学生在助产个案管理模式下的工作体验。
Midwifery. 2019 Jul;74:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
'Continuity of Care Experiences' within pre-registration midwifery education programs: A scoping review.《注册前助产教育项目中的连续护理体验》:范围综述。
Women Birth. 2021 Nov;34(6):514-530. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.12.003. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
Learning through relationships: The transformative learning experience of midwifery continuity of care for students: A qualitative study.通过关系学习:助产连续性护理对学生的变革性学习体验:一项定性研究。
Women Birth. 2023 Jul;36(4):385-392. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
6
Impact of women's feedback on midwifery student learning: A thematic analysis of students' reflections.女性反馈对助产专业学生学习的影响:对学生反思的主题分析
Women Birth. 2023 Nov;36(6):e591-e597. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 26.
7
Culturally capable and culturally safe: Caseload care for Indigenous women by Indigenous midwifery students.具备文化能力且文化安全:原住民助产专业学生对原住民妇女的个案管理照护
Women Birth. 2016 Dec;29(6):524-530. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
8
Using the Five Senses of Success framework to understand the experiences of midwifery students enroled in an undergraduate degree program.运用成功的五种感官框架来理解攻读本科学位课程的助产专业学生的经历。
Midwifery. 2015 Jan;31(1):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
Advocacy, accountability and autonomy; the learning intention of the midwifery student continuity of care experience.倡导、问责与自主;助产专业学生连续性护理体验的学习目标。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103772. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103772. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
10
'It's a good thing…': Women's views on their continuity experiences with midwifery students from one Australian region.“这是件好事……”:澳大利亚某地区女性对与助产专业学生连续性接触经历的看法。
Midwifery. 2014 Mar;30(3):e108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening midwifery in the South-East Asian region: A scoping review of midwifery-related research.加强东南亚地区的助产服务:助产相关研究的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 15;18(12):e0294294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294294. eCollection 2023.
2
Midwifery continuity of care: A scoping review of where, how, by whom and for whom?助产护理的连续性:关于地点、方式、实施者及受益对象的范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;2(10):e0000935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000935. eCollection 2022.
3
Domains of competence in midwifery students: a basis for developing a competence assessment tool for iranian undergraduate midwifery students.助产士学生的能力领域:为伊朗本科助产士学生开发能力评估工具的基础。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03759-z.
4
Use of non-pharmacological methods in managing labour pain: experiences of nurse-midwives in two selected district hospitals in eastern Tanzania.在坦桑尼亚东部的两家选定地区医院中,助产士在管理分娩疼痛时使用非药物方法的经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 30;22(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04707-x.
5
A comparison of team-based learning and lecture-based learning on clinical reasoning and classroom engagement: a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于团队学习和基于讲座的学习对临床推理和课堂参与的比较:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02881-8.
6
Women's perception of continuity of team midwifery care in Iran: a qualitative content analysis.伊朗妇女对团队助产士护理连续性的认知:定性内容分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 2;21(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03666-z.
7
Effects of team-based learning about postpartum haemorrhage on learning outcomes and experience of midwifery students in Indonesia: A pilot study.印尼母婴助产专业学生团队学习产后出血效果的初步研究:学习成果和经验。
Nurs Open. 2020 Sep 17;8(1):241-250. doi: 10.1002/nop2.623. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
Perception of childbirth experiences of Japanese women in Bali, Indonesia: a qualitative study.印度尼西亚巴厘岛的日本女性对分娩经历的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03466-x.
9
"We know it's labour pain, so we don't do anything": healthcare provider's knowledge and attitudes regarding the provision of pain relief during labour and after childbirth.“我们知道这是分娩痛,所以我们什么也不做”:医疗保健提供者对分娩中和分娩后提供止痛的知识和态度。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 14;18(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2076-7.

本文引用的文献

1
A protocol for evaluating progressive levels of simulation fidelity in the development of technical skills, integrated performance and woman centred clinical assessment skills in undergraduate midwifery students.一种评估本科助产学生技术技能、综合表现和以妇女为中心的临床评估技能发展中模拟逼真度渐进水平的方案。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 May 24;13:72. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-72.
2
The 'follow-through' experience in three-year Bachelor of Midwifery programs in Australia: a survey of students.澳大利亚三年制助产士学士课程中的“跟进体验”:对学生的调查。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2012 Sep;12(5):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 May 30.
3
An exploration of the midwifery continuity of care program at one Australian University as a symbiotic clinical education model.探索澳大利亚一所大学的助产士连续护理项目,将其作为一种共生的临床教育模式。
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Mar;33(3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.020. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
4
A qualitative study exploring student midwives' experiences of carrying a caseload as part of their midwifery education in England.一项探索英格兰学生助产士在其助产教育中承担病例量的经验的定性研究。
Midwifery. 2011 Dec;27(6):786-92. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
5
Women's experiences of a Follow Through Journey Program with Bachelor of Midwifery students.女性参与助产士专业学生跟进式旅程项目的经历。
Women Birth. 2007 Dec;20(4):149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
6
Woman-centered maternity nursing education and practice.以女性为中心的产科护理教育与实践。
J Perinat Educ. 2003 Winter;12(1):18-28. doi: 10.1624/105812403X106694.
7
Follow through experiences--as midwifery curriculum.
Aust J Midwifery. 2003 Jun;16(2):5-6.
8
Community-based continuity of midwifery care versus standard hospital care: a cost analysis.
Aust Health Rev. 2001;24(1):85-93. doi: 10.1071/ah010085.
9
Woman-centred care.以女性为中心的护理。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2001 Apr;38(2):227-38. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(00)00034-1.
10
A systematic review comparing continuity of midwifery care with standard maternity services.一项比较助产护理连续性与标准产科服务的系统评价。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Nov;105(11):1160-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09969.x.

通过连续护理(CoC)学习模式,学生对助产护理中“以妇女为中心的护理理念”的理解:一项准实验研究。

Students' understanding of "Women-Centred Care Philosophy" in midwifery care through Continuity of Care (CoC) learning model: a quasi-experimental study.

机构信息

Undergraduate Program of Midwifery Education, Estu Utomo Boyolali School of Health Science, Tentara Pelajar Street no. 12, Mudal, Boyolali 57351 Indonesia.

Department of Medical Education and Family Medicine Graduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Radiopoetro Building 6th floor, Farmako Street no. 1, Sekip Utara, Jogjakarta 55281 Indonesia.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2015 Apr 22;14:22. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0072-z. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-015-0072-z
PMID:25937819
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4416326/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The philosophy of midwifery education is based on the 'Women-centred care' model, which provides holistic care to women. Continuity of care (CoC) is integral to the concept of holistic women-centred care and fundamental to midwifery practice. The objective of this study was to determine any differences in students' understanding of midwifery care philosophy between students who underwent the CoC learning model and those who underwent the fragmented care learning model.

METHOD

We used a quasi-experiment design. This study was conducted by all final year midwifery students at two schools of midwifery in Indonesia. Fifty four students from one school attended 6 months of clinical training using the CoC learning model. The control group was comprised of 52 students from the other school. These students used the conventional clinical training model (the fragmented care learning model). The independent T-test using SPSS was used to analyse the differences between the two groups of students in terms of understanding midwifey care philosophy in five aspects (personalized, holistic, partnership, collaborative, and evidence-based care).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups before interventon. There were significant differences between the two groups after clinical training (p < 0.01). The mean post-clinical score of students using all five aspects of the CoC clinical learning model (15.96) was higher than that of the students in the control group (10.65). The CoC clinical learning model was shown to be a unique learning opportunity for students to understand the philosophy of midwifery. Being aligned with midwifery patients and developing effective relationships with them offered the students a unique view of midwifery practice. This also promoted an increased understanding of the philosophy of women-centred care. Zero maternal mortality rate was found in the experiment group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that clinical trainingwith a CoC learning model is more likely to increase students' understanding of midwifery care philosophy. This in turn improves the quality ofclinical care, thereby enhancing overall health benefits for women.

摘要

背景

助产教育哲学基于“以妇女为中心的护理”模式,为妇女提供全面护理。连续护理(CoC)是整体以妇女为中心护理概念的组成部分,也是助产实践的基础。本研究的目的是确定在接受连续护理学习模式和碎片化护理学习模式的学生中,他们对助产护理哲学的理解是否存在差异。

方法

我们使用了准实验设计。这项研究在印度尼西亚的两所助产学校的所有最后一年助产学生中进行。一所学校的 54 名学生参加了为期 6 个月的以 CoC 学习模式为基础的临床培训。对照组由另一所学校的 52 名学生组成。这些学生使用传统的临床培训模式(碎片化护理学习模式)。使用 SPSS 的独立 T 检验分析两组学生在五个方面(个性化、整体、伙伴关系、协作和基于证据的护理)理解助产护理哲学方面的差异。

结果

干预前两组之间没有显著差异。临床培训后两组之间有显著差异(p < 0.01)。使用 CoC 临床学习模式的所有五个方面的学生的临床培训后平均分(15.96)高于对照组的学生(10.65)。CoC 临床学习模式为学生提供了一个独特的学习机会,以了解助产哲学。与助产患者保持一致并与他们建立有效的关系,为学生提供了对助产实践的独特视角。这也促进了对以妇女为中心的护理哲学的理解。实验组发现母婴死亡率为零。

结论

这项研究的结果表明,以 CoC 学习模式为基础的临床培训更有可能增加学生对助产护理哲学的理解。这反过来又提高了临床护理质量,从而提高了妇女的整体健康效益。