Godwin Hayward J, Walenchok Stephen C, Houpt Joseph W, Hout Michael C, Goldinger Stephen D
School of Psychology, University of Southampton.
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1007-20. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000036. Epub 2015 May 4.
When engaged in a visual search for two targets, participants are slower and less accurate in their responses, relative to their performance when searching for singular targets. Previous work on this "dual-target cost" has primarily focused on the breakdown of attentional guidance when looking for two items. Here, we investigated how object identification processes are affected by dual-target search. Our goal was to chart the speed at which distractors could be rejected, to assess whether dual-target search impairs object identification. To do so, we examined the capacity coefficient, which measures the speed at which decisions can be made, and provides a baseline of parallel performance against which to compare. We found that participants could search at or above this baseline, suggesting that dual-target search does not impair object identification abilities. We also found substantial differences in performance when participants were asked to search for simple versus complex images. Somewhat paradoxically, participants were able to reject complex images more rapidly than simple images. We suggest that this reflects the greater number of features that can be used to identify complex images, a finding that has important consequences for understanding object identification in visual search more generally.
在进行对两个目标的视觉搜索时,与搜索单个目标时的表现相比,参与者的反应更慢且准确性更低。此前关于这种“双目标代价”的研究主要集中在寻找两个物品时注意力引导的分解情况。在此,我们研究了双目标搜索如何影响物体识别过程。我们的目标是确定能够排除干扰项的速度,以评估双目标搜索是否会损害物体识别能力。为此,我们考察了容量系数,它衡量做出决策的速度,并提供了一个平行表现的基线以供比较。我们发现参与者能够以该基线速度或高于该基线速度进行搜索,这表明双目标搜索不会损害物体识别能力。我们还发现,当要求参与者搜索简单图像与复杂图像时,表现存在显著差异。有点自相矛盾的是,参与者能够比简单图像更快地排除复杂图像。我们认为,这反映了可用于识别复杂图像的特征数量更多,这一发现对于更全面地理解视觉搜索中的物体识别具有重要意义。