Chie Wei-Chu, Yu Fang, Li Mengqian, Baccaglini Lorena, Blazeby Jane M, Hsiao Chin-Fu, Chiu Herng-Chia, Poon Ronnie T, Mikoshiba Naoko, Al-Kadhimi Gillian, Heaton Nigel, Calara Jozer, Collins Peter, Caddick Katharine, Costantini Anna, Vilgrain Valerie, Chiang Chieh
Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Public Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Qual Life Res. 2015 Oct;24(10):2499-506. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0985-8. Epub 2015 May 6.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. One of the primary treatment goals for incurable advanced cases is to prolong quality of life (QoL). Thus, to determine which HCC therapies may be linked to a more favorable QoL, we assessed the association between QoL changes and different treatments in HCC patients.
We analyzed a non-randomized multicenter longitudinal study, which included 171 patients treated with surgery (n = 53), ablation (n = 53) or embolization (n = 65) from seven centers: four Asian and three European sites. All participants completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 questionnaires before and after treatment. Propensity scores were calculated and used in addition to race for adjustment in the logistic regression model to account for the confounding effects of patient characteristics including age, gender, race, employment, living with family, at least one comorbid condition, years since diagnosis, prior treatment history, BCLC stage, Child-Pugh grade, cirrhosis, bilirubin levels and QoL score before treatment.
After adjustment for confounders, patients tended to have higher odds of QoL deterioration when treated with ablation versus embolization (dyspnea: p = 0.019; appetite loss: p = 0.018; body image: p = 0.035) or ablation versus surgery (dyspnea: p = 0.099; appetite loss: p = 0.100; body image: p = 0.038).
There were significant differences in QoL deterioration across different treatment groups. This information may assist patients and providers when selecting patient-centered treatment approaches for HCC.
肝细胞癌(HCC)是全球癌症相关死亡的第二大主要原因。对于无法治愈的晚期病例,主要治疗目标之一是延长生活质量(QoL)。因此,为了确定哪些HCC治疗方法可能与更有利的生活质量相关,我们评估了HCC患者生活质量变化与不同治疗方法之间的关联。
我们分析了一项非随机多中心纵向研究,该研究纳入了来自七个中心(四个亚洲中心和三个欧洲中心)的171例接受手术(n = 53)、消融(n = 53)或栓塞(n = 65)治疗的患者。所有参与者在治疗前后均完成了欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的QLQ - C30和QLQ - HCC18问卷。计算倾向得分,并在逻辑回归模型中除种族外用于调整,以考虑患者特征的混杂效应,包括年龄、性别、种族、就业状况、与家人同住、至少一种合并症、诊断后的年数、既往治疗史、巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期、Child - Pugh分级、肝硬化、胆红素水平以及治疗前的生活质量得分。
在对混杂因素进行调整后,与栓塞治疗相比,接受消融治疗的患者生活质量恶化的几率更高(呼吸困难:p = 0.019;食欲减退:p = 0.018;身体形象:p = 0.035);与手术治疗相比,接受消融治疗的患者生活质量恶化的几率也更高(呼吸困难:p = 0.099;食欲减退:p = 0.100;身体形象:p = 0.038)。
不同治疗组在生活质量恶化方面存在显著差异。这些信息可能有助于患者和医疗服务提供者为HCC选择以患者为中心的治疗方法。