Logan Alan C
CAMNR, 23679 Calabasas Road Suite 542, Calabasas, CA, 91302, USA.
J Physiol Anthropol. 2015 May 7;34(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40101-015-0061-7.
Advances in research concerning the mental health implications of dietary patterns and select nutrients have been remarkable. At the same time, there have been rapid increases in the understanding of the ways in which non-pathogenic microbes can potentially influence many aspects of human health, including those in the mental realm. Discussions of nutrition and microbiota are often overlapping. A separate, yet equally connected, avenue of research is that related to natural (for example, green space) and built environments, and in particular, how they are connected to human cognition and behaviors. It is argued here that in Western industrial nations a 'disparity of microbiota' might be expected among the socioeconomically disadvantaged, those whom face more profound environmental forces. Many of the environmental forces pushing against the vulnerable are at the neighborhood level. Matching the developing microbiome research with existing environmental justice research suggests that grey space may promote dysbiosis by default. In addition, the influence of Westernized lifestyle patterns, and the marketing forces that drive unhealthy behaviors in deprived communities, might allow dysbiosis to be the norm rather than the exception in those already at high risk of depression, subthreshold (subsyndromal) conditions, and subpar mental health. If microbiota are indeed at the intersection of nutrition, environmental health, and lifestyle medicine (as these avenues pertain to mental health), then perhaps the rapidly evolving gut-brain-microbiota conversation needs to operate through a wider lens. In contrast to the more narrowly defined psychobiotic, the term eco-psychotropic is introduced.
关于饮食模式和特定营养素对心理健康影响的研究进展显著。与此同时,人们对非致病性微生物可能影响人类健康诸多方面(包括心理领域)的方式的理解也迅速增加。营养与微生物群的讨论往往相互重叠。另一个虽独立但同样相关的研究途径是与自然(如绿地)和人造环境相关的,特别是它们如何与人类认知和行为相联系。本文认为,在西方工业国家,社会经济地位不利的人群(即那些面临更深刻环境压力的人群)中可能会出现“微生物群差异”。许多对弱势群体产生影响的环境压力都发生在社区层面。将不断发展的微生物组研究与现有的环境正义研究相结合表明,灰色空间可能默认会促进生态失调。此外,西方化生活方式模式的影响以及在贫困社区推动不健康行为的市场力量,可能会使生态失调在那些已经处于患抑郁症、亚阈值(亚综合征)状态和心理健康不佳高风险的人群中成为常态而非例外。如果微生物群确实处于营养、环境卫生和生活方式医学(因为这些途径与心理健康相关)的交叉点,那么或许迅速发展的肠道 - 大脑 - 微生物群对话需要从更广阔的视角展开。与定义更狭窄的精神益生菌相比,本文引入了“生态精神药物”这一术语。