Zhang Cai-Yuan, Cui Yan-Fen, Guo Chen, Cai Jing, Weng Ya-Fang, Wang Li-Jun, Wang Deng-Bin
Cai-Yuan Zhang, Yan-Fen Cui, Chen Guo, Jing Cai, Ya-Fang Weng, Li-Jun Wang, Deng-Bin Wang, Department of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5259-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5259.
To evaluate the feasibility of low contrast medium and radiation dose for hepatic computed tomography (CT) perfusion of rabbit VX2 tumor.
Eleven rabbits with hepatic VX2 tumor underwent perfusion CT scanning with a 24-h interval between a conventional tube potential (120 kVp) protocol with 350 mgI/mL contrast medium and filtered back projection, and a low tube potential (80 kVp) protocol with 270 mgI/mL contrast medium with iterative reconstruction. Correlation and agreement among perfusion parameters acquired by the conventional and low dose protocols were assessed for the viable tumor component as well as whole tumor. Image noise and tumor-to-liver contrast to noise ratio during arterial and portal venous phases were evaluated.
A 38% reduction in contrast medium dose (360.1 ± 13.3 mgI/kg vs 583.5 ± 21.5 mgI/kg, P < 0.001) and a 73% decrease in radiation dose (1898.5 mGy • cm vs 6951.8 mGy • cm) were observed. Interestingly, there was a strong positive correlation in hepatic arterial perfusion (r = 0.907, P < 0.001; r = 0.879, P < 0.001), hepatic portal perfusion (r = 0.819, P = 0.002; r = 0.831, P = 0.002), and hepatic blood flow (r = 0.945, P < 0.001; r = 0.930, P < 0.001) as well as a moderate correlation in hepatic perfusion index (r = 0.736, P = 0.01; r = 0.636, P = 0.035) between the low dose protocol with iterative reconstruction and the conventional protocol for the viable tumor component and the whole tumor. These two imaging protocols provided a moderate but acceptable agreement for perfusion parameters and similar tumor-to-liver CNR during arterial and portal venous phases (5.63 ± 2.38 vs 6.16 ± 2.60, P = 0.814; 4.60 ± 1.27 vs 5.11 ± 1.74, P = 0.587).
Compared with the conventional protocol, low contrast medium and radiation dose with iterative reconstruction has no significant influence on hepatic perfusion parameters for rabbits VX2 tumor.
评估低对比剂用量和低辐射剂量用于兔VX2肝癌计算机断层扫描(CT)灌注成像的可行性。
11只患有VX2肝癌的兔子接受灌注CT扫描,间隔24小时,分别采用常规管电压(120 kVp)、350 mgI/mL对比剂及滤波反投影法,以及低管电压(80 kVp)、270 mgI/mL对比剂及迭代重建法。评估常规方案和低剂量方案获得的灌注参数在存活肿瘤成分及整个肿瘤中的相关性和一致性。评估动脉期和门静脉期的图像噪声及肿瘤与肝脏的对比噪声比。
对比剂用量降低了38%(360.1±13.3 mgI/kg vs 583.5±21.5 mgI/kg,P<0.001),辐射剂量降低了73%(1898.5 mGy•cm vs 6951.8 mGy•cm)。有趣的是,对于存活肿瘤成分和整个肿瘤,采用迭代重建的低剂量方案与常规方案在肝动脉灌注(r = 0.907,P<0.001;r = 0.879,P<0.001)、肝门静脉灌注(r = 0.8^9,P = 0.002;r = 0.831,P = 0.002)、肝血流量(r = 0.945,P<0.001;r = 0.930,P<0.001)方面存在强正相关,在肝灌注指数方面存在中度相关(r = 0.736,P = 0.01;r = 0.636,P = 0.035)。这两种成像方案在灌注参数方面具有中度但可接受的一致性,在动脉期和门静脉期肿瘤与肝脏的对比噪声比相似(5.63±2.38 vs 6.16±2.60,P = 0.814;4.60±1.27 vs 5.11±1.74,P = 0.587)。
与常规方案相比,低对比剂用量和低辐射剂量联合迭代重建对兔VX2肝癌的肝灌注参数无显著影响。