Kelly Michael P, Kelly Rachel S, Russo Federica
Perspect Biol Med. 2014 Summer;57(3):308-28. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2014.0026.
A large part of contemporary medicine is concerned with describing and understanding the biological mechanisms involved in disease causation. Comparatively less attention has been paid to the socioeconomic and behavioral mechanisms underlying disease. This article argues for an integration of social, behavioral, and biological factors in the explanation of pathogenesis, a perspective that is in accord with the vision of pioneer public health practitioners of the 19th century, but that has gradually been overtaken by the dominance of the biomedical disease model. In recent decades, the social components of disease have been depicted as "distal" factors or used as "classificatory" devices. We explain how the integration we propose, which draws upon the concepts of "mixed mechanism" and of "lifeworld," advances the view of several scholars of the recent past. Finally, we discuss new findings in epigenetics and psychology, where socioeconomic disparities appear to be an integral part of the explanation of health conditions, to illustrate how the integration may work in practice.
当代医学的很大一部分都致力于描述和理解疾病成因中涉及的生物学机制。相对而言,对疾病背后的社会经济和行为机制的关注较少。本文主张在解释发病机制时将社会、行为和生物学因素整合起来,这一观点与19世纪先驱公共卫生从业者的愿景一致,但逐渐被生物医学疾病模型的主导地位所超越。近几十年来,疾病的社会组成部分被描述为“远端”因素或用作“分类”工具。我们解释了我们提出的整合如何借鉴“混合机制”和“生活世界”的概念,推进了过去几位学者的观点。最后,我们讨论表观遗传学和心理学方面的新发现,其中社会经济差异似乎是健康状况解释中不可或缺的一部分,以说明这种整合在实践中可能如何发挥作用。