Effects of add-on lipid-modifying therapy on top of background statin treatment on major cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND

In patients at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs), residual cardiovascular risk persists despite the achievement of target LDL cholesterol levels with statin therapy. It is still unclear whether adding lipid-modifying agent to statin treatment can further improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in terms of adding lipid-modifying agent to statin versus statin monotherapy in patients at high risk of ASCVD were identified by electronic and manual searches. Results were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs with 109,244 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the incidences of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were 9.70% in the statin combination groups and 9.92% in the statin monotherapy groups. No significant difference was observed in the risk of MACEs either in overall (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.05, P=0.76) or subgroup analysis (CETP inhibitor: RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93-1.23, P=0.37; niacin: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85-1.25, P=0.79; n-3 fatty acid: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88-1.09, P=0.70; fenofibrate: RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.80-1.09, P=0.38), with the exception of the statin/ezetimibe combination subgroup (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.97, P=0.004). Adding lipid-modifying agent to statin significantly increased liver injury risk. Adding ezetimibe to statin did not alter side effect profile.

CONCLUSION

Adding niacin, CETP inhibitors, n-3 fatty acid or fibrates to statin therapy has all failed to achieve a clinical benefit. Adding ezetimibe to statin therapy further lowers LDL-cholesterol safely and translates into a clinical benefit in patients at high risk of ASCVD.