Buller Mark J, Tharion William J, Duhamel Cynthia M, Yokota Miyo
a United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine , Kansas Street, Natick , MA , USA.
Ergonomics. 2015;58(11):1830-41. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1036792. Epub 2015 May 13.
First responders often wear personal protective equipment (PPE) for protection from on-the-job hazards. While PPE ensembles offer individuals protection, they limit one's ability to thermoregulate, and can place the wearer in danger of heat exhaustion and higher cardiac stress. Automatically monitoring thermal-work strain is one means to manage these risks, but measuring core body temperature (Tc) has proved problematic. An algorithm that estimates Tc from sequential measures of heart rate (HR) was compared to the observed Tc from 27 US soldiers participating in three different chemical/biological training events (45-90 min duration) while wearing PPE. Hotter participants (higher Tc) averaged (HRs) of 140 bpm and reached Tc around 39 °C. Overall the algorithm had a small bias (0.02 °C) and root mean square error (0.21 °C). Limits of agreement (LoA ± 0.48 °C) were similar to comparisons of Tc measured by oesophageal and rectal probes. The algorithm shows promise for use in real-time monitoring of encapsulated first responders.
An algorithm to estimate core temperature (Tc) from non-invasive measures of HR was validated. Three independent studies (n = 27) compared the estimated Tc to the observed Tc in humans participating in chemical/ biological hazard training. The algorithm’s bias and variance to observed data were similar to that found from comparisons of oesophageal and rectal measurements.
急救人员经常穿戴个人防护装备(PPE)以抵御工作中的危害。虽然个人防护装备套装能为个人提供保护,但它们限制了人体的体温调节能力,可能使穿戴者面临中暑和心脏压力增大的危险。自动监测热工作应激是管理这些风险的一种方法,但测量核心体温(Tc)已被证明存在问题。将一种根据心率(HR)的连续测量值估算Tc的算法,与27名参加三项不同化学/生物训练活动(持续45 - 90分钟)且穿戴个人防护装备的美国士兵的实测Tc进行了比较。体温较高的参与者(较高的Tc)平均心率(HRs)为140次/分钟,Tc达到约39°C。总体而言,该算法的偏差较小(0.02°C),均方根误差为(0.21°C)。一致性界限(LoA ± 0.48°C)与通过食管和直肠探头测量的Tc比较结果相似。该算法显示出可用于实时监测穿戴防护装备的急救人员的前景。
一种根据心率的非侵入性测量估算核心体温(Tc)的算法得到了验证。三项独立研究(n = 27)将估算的Tc与参加化学/生物危害训练的人体实测Tc进行了比较。该算法与实测数据的偏差和方差与食管和直肠测量的比较结果相似。