Suppr超能文献

爱尔康威视得EX500与索诺盖奇角膜测量仪升级版平台之间的角膜测厚测量比较。

Comparison of pachymetry measurements between the Alcon Wavelight EX500 and Sonogage Corneo-Gage plus platforms.

作者信息

Soeken Timothy A, Apsey Douglas A, Townley James R, Haas Roy W, Caldwell Matthew C

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2015 May;31(5):328-32. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150423-06.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the agreement of intraoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of the Wavelight EX500 (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) that uses optical low coherence reflectometry to the Corneo-Gage Plus ultrasound pachymetry device (Sonogage, Cleveland, OH).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 50 eyes of 26 patients undergoing LASIK were evaluated. Following LASIK flap creation, each eye was measured by both optical low coherence reflectometry and ultrasound pachymetry immediately prior to flap lifting and then again after flap lifting.

RESULTS

The mean CCT value before lifting the flap was 556.9 and 557.78 µm as measured by ultrasound pachymetry and optical low coherence reflectometry, respectively. After lifting the flap, the mean ultrasound pachymetry value was 440.96 µm and the mean optical low coherence reflectometry value was 441.7 µm. A two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test demonstrated that the ultrasound pachymetry and the optical low coherence reflectometry distribution of measurements were the same. A Shapiro-Wilk test of normality could not be rejected. Bland-Altman plots showed strong agreement. The correlation between the two tests was 0.98 before flap lifting and 0.97 after flap lifting, both with a 95% confidence interval.

CONCLUSIONS

The pachymetry measurements by the optical low coherence reflectometry correlated with those of the ultrasound pachymetry device. The Wavelight EX500 optical low coherence reflectometry may be used in place of the ultrasound pachymetry device for measuring CCT.

摘要

目的

比较采用光学低相干反射测量法的威视EX500(爱尔康实验室,沃思堡,德克萨斯州)术中中央角膜厚度(CCT)测量值与Corneo-Gage Plus超声角膜测厚仪(索诺盖奇公司,克利夫兰,俄亥俄州)测量值的一致性。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,对26例行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)患者的50只眼睛进行了评估。制作LASIK角膜瓣后,在掀起角膜瓣之前以及掀起角膜瓣之后,立即分别采用光学低相干反射测量法和超声角膜测厚法对每只眼睛进行测量。

结果

在掀起角膜瓣之前,超声角膜测厚法和光学低相干反射测量法测得的平均CCT值分别为556.9 µm和557.78 µm。掀起角膜瓣之后,超声角膜测厚法测得的平均测量值为440.96 µm,光学低相干反射测量法测得的平均测量值为441.7 µm。双样本柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验表明,超声角膜测厚法和光学低相干反射测量法的测量值分布相同。正态性的夏皮罗-威尔克检验不能被拒绝。布兰德-奥特曼图显示两者具有很强的一致性。两种检测方法在掀起角膜瓣之前的相关性为0.98,掀起角膜瓣之后的相关性为0.97,两者均具有95%的置信区间。

结论

光学低相干反射测量法测得的角膜厚度测量值与超声角膜测厚仪的测量值相关。威视EX500光学低相干反射测量法可用于替代超声角膜测厚仪测量CCT。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验