Suppr超能文献

甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的严重感染:随机对照试验

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus vancomycin for severe infections caused by meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Paul Mical, Bishara Jihad, Yahav Dafna, Goldberg Elad, Neuberger Ami, Ghanem-Zoubi Nesrin, Dickstein Yaakov, Nseir William, Dan Michael, Leibovici Leonard

机构信息

Unit of Infectious Diseases, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel

Unit of Infectious Diseases, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

BMJ. 2015 May 14;350:h2219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2219.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To show non-inferiority of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of severe infections due to meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

DESIGN

Parallel, open label, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Four acute care hospitals in Israel.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with severe infections caused by MRSA susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and vancomycin. Patients with left sided endocarditis, meningitis, chronic haemodialysis, and prolonged neutropenia were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 320 mg/1600 mg twice daily versus vancomycin 1 g twice daily for a minimum of seven days and then by indication.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy outcome was treatment failure assessed at day 7, consisting of death, persistence of haemodynamic instability or fever, stable or worsening Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and persistence of bacteraemia. The primary safety outcome was all cause mortality at day 30. Non-inferiority was defined by a difference of less than 15% for treatment failure.

RESULTS

252 patients were included in the trial, of whom 91 (36%) had bacteraemia. No significant difference in treatment failure was seen for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (51/135, 38%) versus vancomycin (32/117, 27%)-risk ratio 1.38 (95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.99). However, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole did not meet the non-inferiority criterion-absolute difference 10.4% (95% confidence interval -1.2% to 21.5%). For patients with bacteraemia, the risk ratio was 1.40 (0.91 to 2.16). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was significantly associated with treatment failure (adjusted odds ratio 2.00, 1.09 to 3.65). The 30 day mortality rate was 32/252 (13%), with no significant difference between arms. Among patients with bacteraemia, 14/41 (34%) treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and 9/50 (18%) with vancomycin died (risk ratio 1.90, 0.92 to 3.93).

CONCLUSIONS

High dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole did not achieve non-inferiority to vancomycin in the treatment of severe MRSA infections. The difference was particularly marked for patients with bacteraemia. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00427076.

摘要

目的

证明与万古霉素相比,复方新诺明治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)所致严重感染时具有非劣效性。

设计

平行、开放标签、随机对照试验。

地点

以色列的四家急症医院。

参与者

由对复方新诺明和万古霉素敏感的MRSA引起严重感染的成年人。排除左侧心内膜炎、脑膜炎、慢性血液透析和长期中性粒细胞减少的患者。

干预措施

复方新诺明320毫克/1600毫克,每日两次,与万古霉素1克,每日两次,至少治疗7天,然后根据指征治疗。

主要结局指标

主要疗效结局为第7天评估的治疗失败,包括死亡、血流动力学不稳定或发热持续存在、序贯器官衰竭评估评分稳定或恶化以及菌血症持续存在。主要安全性结局为第30天的全因死亡率。非劣效性定义为治疗失败的差异小于15%。

结果

252名患者纳入试验,其中91名(36%)有菌血症。复方新诺明组(51/135,38%)与万古霉素组(32/117,27%)的治疗失败率无显著差异,风险比为1.38(95%置信区间0.96至1.99)。然而,复方新诺明未达到非劣效性标准,绝对差异为10.4%(95%置信区间-1.2%至21.5%)。对于有菌血症的患者,风险比为1.40(0.91至2.16)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,复方新诺明与治疗失败显著相关(调整后的优势比为2.00,1.09至3.65)。30天死亡率为32/252(13%),两组之间无显著差异。在有菌血症的患者中,复方新诺明治疗组14/41(34%)死亡,万古霉素治疗组9/50(18%)死亡(风险比1.90,0.92至3.93)。

结论

高剂量复方新诺明在治疗严重MRSA感染时未达到非劣效于万古霉素的效果。这种差异在有菌血症的患者中尤为明显。试验注册 临床试验NCT00427076。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f51/4794055/2472e2647180/paum022885.f1_default.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验