Johansson M B, Wollmer P
Department of Clinical Physiology, University of Lund, Sweden.
Clin Physiol. 1989 Dec;9(6):581-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1989.tb01011.x.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate state-of-the-art spectrophotometry for measurement of carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb). We measured the fractional concentration of COHb in 109 blood samples from patients under investigation of anaemia or with exposure to carbon monoxide (smokers) with the OSM3 Hemoximeter and by gas chromatography. Duplicate measurements were made with both methods in 42 samples. We found only a trivial systematic difference between the two methods. There was, however, a considerable scatter of the measurements, the limits of agreement (95% confidence limits for the difference between the two methods) being -0.98 and 0.86% COHb. The poor agreement between the methods was largely explained by a large random scatter in duplicate spectrophotometric measurements, whereas the method based on gas chromatography was highly reproducible. We conclude that the low accuracy of spectrophotometric measurements of COHb precludes its use for assessment of the endogenous production of CO, but that it may be useful for assessment of exposure to exogenous CO.
本研究的目的是评估用于测量碳氧血红蛋白(COHb)的最新分光光度法。我们使用OSM3血氧计和气相色谱法测量了109例正在接受贫血调查或接触过一氧化碳的患者(吸烟者)血液样本中COHb的分数浓度。对42个样本用两种方法进行了重复测量。我们发现两种方法之间只有微不足道的系统差异。然而,测量结果存在相当大的离散度,一致性界限(两种方法之间差异的95%置信界限)为-0.98%和0.86%的COHb。两种方法之间一致性差在很大程度上是由于分光光度法重复测量中存在较大的随机离散度,而基于气相色谱的方法具有高度可重复性。我们得出结论,分光光度法测量COHb的低准确性使其无法用于评估内源性CO的产生,但它可能有助于评估外源性CO的暴露情况。