Xu Fuchao, García-Bermejo Ángel, Malarvannan Govindan, Gómara Belén, Neels Hugo, Covaci Adrian
Toxicological Centre, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Toxicological Centre, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Instrumental Analysis and Environmental Chemistry, Institute of General Organic Chemistry, CSIC, Juan de la Cierva 3, 28006-Madrid, Spain.
J Chromatogr A. 2015 Jul 3;1401:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 11.
A multi-residue analytical method was developed for the determination of a range of flame retardants (FRs), including polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), emerging halogenated FRs (EFRs) and organophosphate FRs (PFRs), in food matrices. An ultrasonication and vacuum assisted extraction (UVAE), followed by a multi-stage clean-up procedure, enabled the removal of up to 1g of lipid from 2.5 g of freeze-dried food samples and significantly reduce matrix effects. UVAE achieves a waste factor (WF) of about 10%, while the WFs of classical QuEChERS methods range usually between 50 and 90%. The low WF of UVAE leads to a dramatic improvement in the sensitivity along with saving up to 90% of spiking (internal) standards. Moreover, a two-stage clean-up on Florisil and aminopropyl silica was introduced after UVAE, for an efficient removal of pigments and residual lipids, which led to cleaner extracts than normally achieved by dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE). In this way, the extracts could be concentrated to low volumes, e.g. <100 μL and the equivalent matrix concentrations were up to 100g ww/mL. The final analysis of PFRs was performed on GC-EI-MS, while PBDEs and EFRs were measured by GC-ECNI-MS. Validation tests were performed with three food matrices (lean beef, whole chicken egg and salmon filet), obtaining acceptable recoveries (66-135%) with good repeatability (RSD 1-24%, mean 7%). Method LOQs ranged between 0.008 and 0.04 ng/g dw for PBDEs, between 0.08 and 0.20 ng/g dw for EFRs, and between 1.4 and 3.6 ng/g dw for PFRs. The method was further applied to eight types of food samples (including meat, eggs, fish, and seafood) with lipid contents ranging from 0.1 to 22%. Various FRs were detected above MLOQ levels, demonstrating the wide-range applicability of our method. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first method reported for simultaneous analysis of brominated and organophosphate FRs in food matrices.
开发了一种多残留分析方法,用于测定食品基质中的一系列阻燃剂(FRs),包括多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)、新兴卤化阻燃剂(EFRs)和有机磷酸酯阻燃剂(PFRs)。采用超声和真空辅助萃取(UVAE),随后进行多步净化程序,能够从2.5 g冷冻干燥食品样品中去除高达1 g的脂质,并显著降低基质效应。UVAE的废液因子(WF)约为10%,而经典的QuEChERS方法的WF通常在50%至90%之间。UVAE的低WF导致灵敏度显著提高,同时节省高达90%的加标(内标)标准品。此外,在UVAE之后引入了在弗罗里硅土和氨丙基硅胶上的两步净化,以有效去除色素和残留脂质,从而得到比分散固相萃取(d-SPE)通常得到的更纯净的提取物。通过这种方式,提取物可以浓缩至低体积,例如<100 μL,等效基质浓度高达100 g ww/mL。PFRs的最终分析在GC-EI-MS上进行,而PBDEs和EFRs通过GC-ECNI-MS测量。使用三种食品基质(瘦牛肉、全鸡蛋和三文鱼片)进行了验证测试,获得了可接受的回收率(66 - 135%),具有良好的重复性(RSD 1 - 24%,平均值7%)。PBDEs的方法定量限在0.008至0.04 ng/g干重之间,EFRs在0.08至0.20 ng/g干重之间,PFRs在1.4至3.6 ng/g干重之间。该方法进一步应用于八种脂质含量在从至%的食品样品(包括肉类、蛋类、鱼类和海鲜)。在高于方法最低定量限水平检测到了各种FRs,证明了我们方法的广泛适用性。据我们所知,这是首次报道的用于同时分析食品基质中溴化和有机磷酸酯阻燃剂的方法。