• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟的农业和自然保护政策的协调。

The alignment of agricultural and nature conservation policies in the European Union.

机构信息

Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EP, United Kingdom.

Department of Ecosystem Services, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, D-04318, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2015 Aug;29(4):996-1005. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12531. Epub 2015 May 21.

DOI:10.1111/cobi.12531
PMID:25998969
Abstract

Europe is a region of relatively high population density and productive agriculture subject to substantial government intervention under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Many habitats and species of high conservation interest have been created by the maintenance of agricultural practices over long periods. These practices are often no longer profitable, and nature conservation initiatives require government support to cover the cost for them to be continued. The CAP has been reformed both to reduce production of agricultural commodities at costs in excess of world prices and to establish incentives for landholders to adopt voluntary conservation measures. A separate nature conservation policy has established an extensive series of protected sites (Natura 2000) that has, as yet, failed to halt the loss of biodiversity. Additional broader scale approaches have been advocated for conservation in the wider landscape matrix, including the alignment of agricultural and nature conservation policies, which remains a challenge. Possibilities for alignment include further shifting of funds from general support for farmers toward targeted payments for biodiversity goals at larger scales and adoption of an ecosystem approach. The European response to the competing demands for land resources may offer lessons globally as demands on rural land increase.

摘要

欧洲是一个人口密度相对较高、农业生产力较高的地区,在共同农业政策(CAP)下受到大量政府干预。许多具有高度保护意义的栖息地和物种是通过长期维持农业实践创造的。这些实践往往不再盈利,自然保护倡议需要政府的支持来支付继续实施这些措施的成本。CAP 已经进行了改革,以降低生产成本,使其低于世界价格,并为土地所有者采用自愿保护措施提供激励。一个单独的自然保护政策已经建立了广泛的保护区网络(Natura 2000),但这仍然未能阻止生物多样性的丧失。还提倡在更广泛的景观基质中采取更广泛的保护方法,包括农业和自然保护政策的协调,这仍然是一个挑战。协调的可能性包括进一步将资金从对农民的一般支持转移到更大规模的生物多样性目标的有针对性支付,并采用生态系统方法。随着对农村土地需求的增加,欧洲对土地资源竞争需求的应对可能为全球提供经验教训。

相似文献

1
The alignment of agricultural and nature conservation policies in the European Union.欧盟的农业和自然保护政策的协调。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Aug;29(4):996-1005. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12531. Epub 2015 May 21.
2
The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management.农业环境计划在保护和环境管理中的作用。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Aug;29(4):1006-1016. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12536. Epub 2015 May 21.
3
Opportunities and challenges for Common Agricultural Policy reform to support the European Green Deal.支持欧洲绿色协议的共同农业政策改革的机遇和挑战。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Jun;37(3):e14052. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14052. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
Varying potential of conservation tools of the Common Agricultural Policy for farmland bird preservation.《共同农业政策保护工具对农田鸟类保护的不同潜力》
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 1;694:133618. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133618. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
5
Changes in land-cover within high nature value farmlands inside and outside Natura 2000 sites in Europe: A preliminary assessment.欧洲自然2000保护区内外高自然价值农田的土地覆盖变化:初步评估
Ambio. 2020 Dec;49(12):1958-1971. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01330-y. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
6
On how much biodiversity is covered in Europe by national protected areas and by the Natura 2000 network: insights from terrestrial vertebrates.关于国家保护区和 Natura 2000 网络覆盖了欧洲多少生物多样性:来自陆生脊椎动物的见解。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Aug;29(4):986-995. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12535. Epub 2015 May 21.
7
Mapping opportunities and challenges for rewilding in Europe.探寻欧洲野化的机遇与挑战。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Aug;29(4):1017-1027. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12533. Epub 2015 May 21.
8
Targeting best agricultural practices to enhance ecosystem services in European mountains.针对最佳农业实践,以提高欧洲山区的生态系统服务。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 15;316:115255. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115255. Epub 2022 May 13.
9
Urban sprawl into Natura 2000 network over Europe.欧洲城市扩张侵入自然 2000 网络。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Aug;35(4):1063-1072. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13687. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
10
A modelling approach for the assessment of the effects of Common Agricultural Policy measures on farmland biodiversity in the EU27.评估欧盟 27 国共同农业政策措施对农田生物多样性影响的建模方法。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Sep 15;126:132-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in ecological scorecards and their potential for wider use.生态记分卡的变化及其更广泛应用的潜力。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Jul 10;196(8):722. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12845-2.
2
Integrating ecosystem markets to co-ordinate landscape-scale public benefits from nature.整合生态系统市场,协调景观尺度的自然公共效益。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):e0258334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258334. eCollection 2022.
3
Hand disorders demographics in rural areas: A 15-year analysis of demographic characteristics overtime in a stable population.
农村地区手部疾病人口统计学:对稳定人群15年人口特征随时间变化的分析。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Nov;54(6):604-608. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19184.
4
Action needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to address sustainability challenges.欧盟共同农业政策需要采取行动以应对可持续发展挑战。
People Nat (Hoboken). 2020 Jun;2(2):305-316. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10080. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
5
Friends or foes? A compatibility assessment of bioeconomy-related Sustainable Development Goals for European policy coherence.朋友还是敌人?欧洲政策一致性下生物经济相关可持续发展目标的兼容性评估
J Clean Prod. 2020 May 1;254:119832. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119832.
6
The decline of farmland birds in Spain is strongly associated to the loss of fallowland.西班牙农田鸟类的减少与休耕地的丧失密切相关。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 1;9(1):9473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45854-0.
7
Evaluation of habitat protection under the European Natura 2000 conservation network - The example for Germany.评价欧洲自然保护网络 Natura 2000 下的生境保护——以德国为例。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0208264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208264. eCollection 2018.
8
Landscape configurational heterogeneity by small-scale agriculture, not crop diversity, maintains pollinators and plant reproduction in western Europe.小规模农业而非作物多样性通过改变景观配置异质性,维持了西欧的传粉者和植物繁殖。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Feb 14;285(1872). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2242.
9
Crop diversity loss as primary cause of grey partridge and common pheasant decline in Lower Saxony, Germany.作物多样性丧失是德国下萨克森州灰山鹑和环颈雉数量下降的主要原因。
BMC Ecol. 2016 Sep 9;16(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0093-9.
10
The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management.农业环境计划在保护和环境管理中的作用。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Aug;29(4):1006-1016. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12536. Epub 2015 May 21.