Knowlton Rachel, Marsack Jason D, Leach Norman E, Herring Ralph J, Anderson Heather A
*BA †PhD, FAAO ‡OD, MS, FAAO §OD, MHA ∥OD, PhD, FAAO University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas (all authors).
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jul;92(7):804-14. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000620.
Subjects with Down syndrome have structural differences in the cornea and lens, as compared with the general population. This study investigates objectively measured refractive and corneal astigmatism, as well as calculated internal astigmatism in subjects with and without Down syndrome.
Refractive (Grand Seiko autorefraction) and anterior corneal astigmatism (difference between steep and flat keratometry obtained with Zeiss Atlas corneal topography) were measured in 128 subjects with Down syndrome (mean [±SD] age, 24.8 [±8.7] years) and 137 control subjects without Down syndrome (mean [±SD] age, 24.9 [±9.9] years), with one eye randomly selected for analysis per subject. Refractive astigmatism and corneal astigmatism were converted to vector notation (J0, J45) to calculate internal astigmatism (Refractive - Corneal) and then converted back to minus cylinder form.
Mean [±SD] refractive astigmatism was significantly greater in subjects with Down syndrome than in control subjects (-1.94 [±1.30] DC vs. -0.66 [±0.60] DC, t = -10.16, p < 0.001), as were mean corneal astigmatism (1.70 [±1.04] DC vs. 1.02 [±0.63] DC, t = 6.38, p < 0.001) and mean internal astigmatism (-1.07 [±0.68] DC vs. -0.77 [±0.41] DC, t = -4.21, p < 0.001). A positive linear correlation between corneal and refractive astigmatism was observed for both study populations for both the J0 and J45 vectors (p < 0.001 for all comparisons; R(2) range, 0.31 to 0.74). The distributions of astigmatism orientation differed significantly between the two study populations for comparisons of corneal and calculated internal astigmatism (χ(2), p < 0.007), but not refractive astigmatism (p = 0.46).
This study demonstrates that corneal astigmatism is predictive of overall refractive astigmatism in subjects with Down syndrome, as it is in the general population. The greater magnitudes of astigmatism and wider variation of astigmatism orientation in subjects with Down syndrome for refractive, corneal, and calculated internal astigmatism are likely attributable to previously reported differences in the structure of the cornea and internal optical components of the eye from that of the general population.
与普通人群相比,唐氏综合征患者的角膜和晶状体存在结构差异。本研究调查了唐氏综合征患者和非唐氏综合征患者客观测量的屈光散光和角膜散光,以及计算得出的内部散光。
对128例唐氏综合征患者(平均[±标准差]年龄,24.8[±8.7]岁)和137例非唐氏综合征对照者(平均[±标准差]年龄,24.9[±9.9]岁)测量屈光(Grand Seiko自动验光)和角膜前散光(用蔡司Atlas角膜地形图获得的陡峭和扁平角膜曲率计测量值之间的差值),每位受试者随机选择一只眼睛进行分析。屈光散光和角膜散光转换为矢量表示法(J0、J45)以计算内部散光(屈光 - 角膜),然后再转换回负柱镜形式。
唐氏综合征患者的平均[±标准差]屈光散光显著高于对照者(-1.94[±1.30]DC对-0.66[±0.60]DC,t = -10.16,p < 0.001),平均角膜散光(1.70[±1.04]DC对1.02[±0.63]DC,t = 6.38,p < 0.001)和平均内部散光(-1.07[±0.68]DC对-0.77[±0.41]DC,t = -4.21,p < 0.001)也是如此。对于J0和J45矢量,两个研究人群的角膜散光和屈光散光之间均观察到正线性相关性(所有比较p < 0.001;R²范围,0.31至0.74)。在比较角膜散光和计算得出的内部散光时,两个研究人群的散光方向分布存在显著差异(χ²,p < 0.007),但屈光散光无差异(p = 0.46)。
本研究表明,与普通人群一样,角膜散光可预测唐氏综合征患者的总体屈光散光。唐氏综合征患者在屈光、角膜和计算得出的内部散光方面散光程度更大且散光方向变化更广泛,这可能归因于先前报道的其角膜和眼内光学组件结构与普通人群不同。