Suppr超能文献

唐氏综合征患者全眼散光与角膜前表面散光的比较。

Comparison of Whole Eye versus First-Surface Astigmatism in Down Syndrome.

作者信息

Knowlton Rachel, Marsack Jason D, Leach Norman E, Herring Ralph J, Anderson Heather A

机构信息

*BA †PhD, FAAO ‡OD, MS, FAAO §OD, MHA ∥OD, PhD, FAAO University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas (all authors).

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jul;92(7):804-14. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000620.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Subjects with Down syndrome have structural differences in the cornea and lens, as compared with the general population. This study investigates objectively measured refractive and corneal astigmatism, as well as calculated internal astigmatism in subjects with and without Down syndrome.

METHODS

Refractive (Grand Seiko autorefraction) and anterior corneal astigmatism (difference between steep and flat keratometry obtained with Zeiss Atlas corneal topography) were measured in 128 subjects with Down syndrome (mean [±SD] age, 24.8 [±8.7] years) and 137 control subjects without Down syndrome (mean [±SD] age, 24.9 [±9.9] years), with one eye randomly selected for analysis per subject. Refractive astigmatism and corneal astigmatism were converted to vector notation (J0, J45) to calculate internal astigmatism (Refractive - Corneal) and then converted back to minus cylinder form.

RESULTS

Mean [±SD] refractive astigmatism was significantly greater in subjects with Down syndrome than in control subjects (-1.94 [±1.30] DC vs. -0.66 [±0.60] DC, t = -10.16, p < 0.001), as were mean corneal astigmatism (1.70 [±1.04] DC vs. 1.02 [±0.63] DC, t = 6.38, p < 0.001) and mean internal astigmatism (-1.07 [±0.68] DC vs. -0.77 [±0.41] DC, t = -4.21, p < 0.001). A positive linear correlation between corneal and refractive astigmatism was observed for both study populations for both the J0 and J45 vectors (p < 0.001 for all comparisons; R(2) range, 0.31 to 0.74). The distributions of astigmatism orientation differed significantly between the two study populations for comparisons of corneal and calculated internal astigmatism (χ(2), p < 0.007), but not refractive astigmatism (p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that corneal astigmatism is predictive of overall refractive astigmatism in subjects with Down syndrome, as it is in the general population. The greater magnitudes of astigmatism and wider variation of astigmatism orientation in subjects with Down syndrome for refractive, corneal, and calculated internal astigmatism are likely attributable to previously reported differences in the structure of the cornea and internal optical components of the eye from that of the general population.

摘要

目的

与普通人群相比,唐氏综合征患者的角膜和晶状体存在结构差异。本研究调查了唐氏综合征患者和非唐氏综合征患者客观测量的屈光散光和角膜散光,以及计算得出的内部散光。

方法

对128例唐氏综合征患者(平均[±标准差]年龄,24.8[±8.7]岁)和137例非唐氏综合征对照者(平均[±标准差]年龄,24.9[±9.9]岁)测量屈光(Grand Seiko自动验光)和角膜前散光(用蔡司Atlas角膜地形图获得的陡峭和扁平角膜曲率计测量值之间的差值),每位受试者随机选择一只眼睛进行分析。屈光散光和角膜散光转换为矢量表示法(J0、J45)以计算内部散光(屈光 - 角膜),然后再转换回负柱镜形式。

结果

唐氏综合征患者的平均[±标准差]屈光散光显著高于对照者(-1.94[±1.30]DC对-0.66[±0.60]DC,t = -10.16,p < 0.001),平均角膜散光(1.70[±1.04]DC对1.02[±0.63]DC,t = 6.38,p < 0.001)和平均内部散光(-1.07[±0.68]DC对-0.77[±0.41]DC,t = -4.21,p < 0.001)也是如此。对于J0和J45矢量,两个研究人群的角膜散光和屈光散光之间均观察到正线性相关性(所有比较p < 0.001;R²范围,0.31至0.74)。在比较角膜散光和计算得出的内部散光时,两个研究人群的散光方向分布存在显著差异(χ²,p < 0.007),但屈光散光无差异(p = 0.46)。

结论

本研究表明,与普通人群一样,角膜散光可预测唐氏综合征患者的总体屈光散光。唐氏综合征患者在屈光、角膜和计算得出的内部散光方面散光程度更大且散光方向变化更广泛,这可能归因于先前报道的其角膜和眼内光学组件结构与普通人群不同。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Whole Eye versus First-Surface Astigmatism in Down Syndrome.
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jul;92(7):804-14. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000620.
2
Corneal power and astigmatism in Down syndrome.
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jun;86(6):748-54. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a59d5d.
3
Agreement between refractive and corneal astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes.
Cornea. 2013 Jun;32(6):783-90. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31826dd44b.
4
Simulated Keratometry Repeatability in Subjects with and without Down Syndrome.
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Nov;93(11):1356-1363. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000987.
5
Total corneal refractive power and shape in Down syndrome.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;31(1):69-77. doi: 10.1177/1120672119883594. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
7
Evaluation of internal refraction with the optical path difference scan.
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jan;115(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.022.
8
Characterisation of internal, refractive, and corneal astigmatism in a UK university student population.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 Aug;43(4):333-337. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
9
The components of adult astigmatism and their age-related changes.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 May;39(3):183-193. doi: 10.1111/opo.12616.
10
Refractive, anterior corneal and internal astigmatism in the pseudophakic eye.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;93(1):33-40. doi: 10.1111/aos.12418. Epub 2014 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Unaided and Aided Visual Acuity in Adults With Down Syndrome.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 2;14(1):30. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.1.30.
2
Sources of reduced visual acuity and spectacle treatment options for individuals with Down syndrome: Review of current literature.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Nov;44(7):1326-1345. doi: 10.1111/opo.13372. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
3
Dioptric differences between clinically determined and metric-optimised refractions for adults with Down syndrome.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Sep;43(5):1016-1028. doi: 10.1111/opo.13165. Epub 2023 May 19.
4
Impact of Pupil Diameter on Objective Refraction Determination and Predicted Visual Acuity.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Dec 12;8(6):32. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.6.32. eCollection 2019 Nov.
5
Application of Topographical Keratoconus Detection Metrics to Eyes of Individuals with Down Syndrome.
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Sep;96(9):664-669. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001417.
6
Image Quality Metric Derived Refractions Predicted to Improve Visual Acuity Beyond Habitual Refraction for Patients With Down Syndrome.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 May 20;8(3):20. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.3.20. eCollection 2019 May.
7
Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.
Optom Vis Sci. 2018 Mar;95(3):202-211. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001185.
8
Variability in Objective Refraction for Persons with Down Syndrome.
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 May;94(5):574-581. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001057.
9
Simulated Keratometry Repeatability in Subjects with and without Down Syndrome.
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Nov;93(11):1356-1363. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000987.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences of the anterior segment parameters in children with down syndrome.
Ophthalmic Genet. 2014 Jun;35(2):74-8. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2013.789535. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
2
Corneal thickness measured by Scheimpflug imaging in children with Down syndrome.
J AAPOS. 2013 Apr;17(2):149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.10.020. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
3
Racial variations in the prevalence of refractive errors in the United States: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1129-1138.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
Risk factors for astigmatism in preschool children: the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease and Baltimore pediatric eye disease studies.
Ophthalmology. 2011 Oct;118(10):1974-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.031. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
5
Development and distribution of refractive error in children with Down's syndrome.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;95(8):1091-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.185827. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
7
Static and dynamic measurements of accommodation in individuals with down syndrome.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jan 5;52(1):310-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5301.
8
Corneal and refractive astigmatism in adults: a power vectors analysis.
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Oct;86(10):1182-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181baac2c.
9
Corneal power and astigmatism in Down syndrome.
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jun;86(6):748-54. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a59d5d.
10
The eyes in mongolism.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1949 Mar;33(3):131-74. doi: 10.1136/bjo.33.3.131.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验