Bressler Susan B, Melia Michele, Glassman Adam R, Almukhtar Talat, Jampol Lee M, Shami Michel, Berger Brian B, Bressler Neil M
*Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; †Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; ‡Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; §Texas Retina Associates, Lubbock, Texas; and ¶Retina Research Center, Austin, Texas.
Retina. 2015 Dec;35(12):2516-28. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000617.
The approach to managing diabetic macular edema in eyes with previous vitrectomy is based on limited evidence. Therefore, an exploratory post hoc assessment of 3-year data from eyes with and without vitrectomy before randomization in a DRCR.net trial that evaluated ranibizumab + prompt or deferred laser for diabetic macular edema is presented.
Visual acuity and optical coherence tomography outcomes were compared between eyes with and without previous vitrectomy.
At baseline, eyes with previous vitrectomy (n = 25) had longer duration of diabetes, worse visual acuity, less thickened central subfield measurements on optical coherence tomography and were more apt to have worse diabetic retinopathy severity level or previous treatment for macular edema or cataract surgery than eyes without a history of vitrectomy (n = 335). Analyses adjusted for these baseline imbalances did not identify substantial differences between eyes with and without previous vitrectomy at each annual visit through 3 years for the favorable visual acuity, optical coherence tomography central subfield thickness, or volume outcomes, although optical coherence tomography improvement appeared slower in vitrectomy eyes during the first year.
This study provides little evidence that the beneficial clinical outcomes for patients with center-involved diabetic macular edema treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor are affected in the long term by previous vitrectomy.
对于既往接受过玻璃体切除术的眼睛,糖尿病性黄斑水肿的管理方法证据有限。因此,本文对DRCR.net一项评估雷珠单抗联合即刻或延迟激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的试验中,随机分组前有或无玻璃体切除术的眼睛的3年数据进行了探索性事后评估。
比较有或无既往玻璃体切除术的眼睛的视力和光学相干断层扫描结果。
在基线时,既往接受过玻璃体切除术的眼睛(n = 25)糖尿病病程更长、视力更差、光学相干断层扫描显示中心子区域测量增厚更少,并且比无玻璃体切除术史的眼睛(n = 335)更易出现更严重的糖尿病视网膜病变、既往有黄斑水肿治疗史或白内障手术史。针对这些基线不平衡进行调整后的分析未发现,在3年的每年随访中,有或无既往玻璃体切除术的眼睛在有利的视力、光学相干断层扫描中心子区域厚度或体积结果方面存在实质性差异,尽管在第一年玻璃体切除的眼睛中光学相干断层扫描改善似乎较慢。
本研究几乎没有证据表明,既往玻璃体切除术会长期影响接受抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的累及中心的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的有益临床结局。