Kulkarni Abhaya V, Donnelly Ruth, Mabbott Donald J, Widjaja Elysa
Divisions of 1 Neurosurgery.
Psychology, and.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Sep;16(3):267-74. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.PEDS14597. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
Larger-than-normal ventricles can persist in children following hydrocephalus treatment, even if they are asymptomatic and clinically well. This study aims to answer the following question: do large ventricles result in brain injuries that are detectable on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and/or in measurable neurocognitive deficits in children with stable, treated hydrocephalus that are not seen in children with small ventricles?
For this prospective study, we recruited 23 children (age range 8-18 years) with hydrocephalus due to aqueductal stenosis or tectal glioma who were asymptomatic following hydrocephalus treatment that had been performed at least 2 years earlier. All patients underwent detailed DTI and a full battery of neuropsychological tests. Correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between DTI parameters, neurocognitive tests, and ventricular size. The false-discovery rate method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.
The median age of these 23 children at the time of assessment was 15.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12.1-17.6 years), and the median age at the first hydrocephalus treatment was 5.8 years (IQR 2.2 months-12.8 years). At the time of assessment, 17 children had undergone endoscopic third ventriculostomy and 6 children had received a shunt. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, there were no significant correlations between any neurocognitive test and ventricular volume, any DTI parameter and ventricular volume, or any DTI parameter and neurocognitive test.
Our data do not show an association between large ventricular size and additional white matter injury or worse neurocognitive deficits in asymptomatic children with stable, treated hydrocephalus caused by a discrete blockage of the cerebral aqueduct. Further investigations using larger patient samples are needed to validate these results.
脑积水治疗后的儿童可能会持续存在脑室大于正常的情况,即便他们没有症状且临床状况良好。本研究旨在回答以下问题:在接受过稳定治疗的脑积水患儿中,大脑室是否会导致在扩散张量成像(DTI)上可检测到的脑损伤和/或可测量的神经认知缺陷,而这些在脑室小的儿童中未见?
在这项前瞻性研究中,我们招募了23名因导水管狭窄或顶盖胶质瘤而患有脑积水的儿童(年龄范围8 - 18岁),他们在至少2年前接受脑积水治疗后无症状。所有患者均接受了详细的DTI检查和全套神经心理学测试。进行相关性分析以评估DTI参数、神经认知测试和脑室大小之间的关系。采用错误发现率方法对多重比较进行校正。
这23名儿童在评估时的中位年龄为15.0岁(四分位间距[IQR] 12.1 - 17.6岁),首次脑积水治疗时的中位年龄为5.8岁(IQR 2.2个月 - 12.8岁)。在评估时,17名儿童接受了内镜下第三脑室造瘘术,6名儿童接受了分流术。在对多重比较进行校正后,任何神经认知测试与脑室容积之间、任何DTI参数与脑室容积之间、任何DTI参数与神经认知测试之间均无显著相关性。
我们的数据未显示在因大脑导水管离散性阻塞导致的稳定、接受过治疗的无症状脑积水患儿中,大脑室大小与额外的白质损伤或更严重的神经认知缺陷之间存在关联。需要使用更大的患者样本进行进一步研究以验证这些结果。