Kulkarni Abhaya V, Sgouros Spyros, Leitner Yael, Constantini Shlomi
The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Mitera Children's Hospital, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2018 Dec;34(12):2391-2397. doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-3896-5. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
One of the most important unanswered questions in pediatric hydrocephalus is determining whether treatment with endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) versus shunt results in improved health status and quality of life (QOL). To answer this, the International Infant Hydrocephalus Study (IIHS) was started in 2005 as a prospective, multicenter study to compare ETV and shunt in infants (< 24 months old) with symptomatic triventricular hydrocephalus from aqueductal stenosis. Herein, we present the 5-year primary outcome results.
IIHS utilized a prospective comprehensive cohort design, in which patients received ETV or shunt, based on either randomization or parental preference. For this analysis, we pooled the randomized arm and the parental preference arm, analyzing them together. At 5 years of age, children were assessed with the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI-2) (primary outcome) and the Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire (HOQ), a measure of QOL. Results were compared in an analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline variables including age at surgery and baseline development status.
From a total of 158 patients who met eligibility criteria, complete 5-year outcomes were available on 78 (19 treated initially with shunt, 61 treated initially with ETV), assessed at a mean age of 62.1 months (SD 6.3). The mean 5-year HUI-2 utility score was 0.90 (SD 0.19) for ETV and 0.94 (SD 0.10) for shunt (p = 0.21). The mean 5-year HOQ overall score was 0.81 (SD 0.15) for ETV and 0.85 (SD 0.12) for shunt (p = 0.42). Similarly, there were no significant differences noted between 5-year HOQ subscores (cognitive, social-emotional, physical) or developmental measures at 1, 2, and 3 years.
This is the first prospective direct comparison of long-term outcomes of ETV and shunt for infant hydrocephalus. These results suggest that overall health status and quality of life in this cohort of infants treated for aqueductal stenosis are high, with no significant difference between those treated initially with ETV or shunt.
NCT00652470.
小儿脑积水最重要的未解决问题之一是确定内镜下第三脑室造瘘术(ETV)与分流术相比,是否能改善健康状况和生活质量(QOL)。为了回答这个问题,国际婴儿脑积水研究(IIHS)于2005年启动,作为一项前瞻性、多中心研究,比较ETV和分流术在患有导水管狭窄所致症状性三脑室脑积水的婴儿(<24个月)中的应用。在此,我们展示5年的主要结局结果。
IIHS采用前瞻性综合队列设计,患者根据随机分组或家长意愿接受ETV或分流术。对于本分析,我们将随机分组组和家长意愿组合并在一起进行分析。在5岁时,使用健康效用指数2级(HUI-2)(主要结局)和脑积水结局问卷(HOQ,一种生活质量测量工具)对儿童进行评估。在协方差分析中比较结果,并对包括手术时年龄和基线发育状况在内的基线变量进行校正。
在总共158例符合纳入标准的患者中,78例有完整的5年结局数据(19例最初接受分流术治疗,61例最初接受ETV治疗),评估时的平均年龄为62.1个月(标准差6.3)。ETV组的平均5年HUI-2效用评分为0.90(标准差0.19),分流术组为0.94(标准差0.10)(p = 0.21)。ETV组的平均5年HOQ总分是0.81(标准差0.15),分流术组是0.85(标准差0.12)(p = 0.42)。同样,5年HOQ子评分(认知、社会情感、身体)或1年、2年和3年时的发育指标之间也未发现显著差异。
这是首次对婴儿脑积水的ETV和分流术长期结局进行前瞻性直接比较。这些结果表明,在这组接受导水管狭窄治疗的婴儿中,总体健康状况和生活质量较高,最初接受ETV或分流术治疗的婴儿之间无显著差异。
NCT00652470