Suppr超能文献

气相色谱-四极杆质谱法分析蜜蜂、花粉和蜂蜡中特定农药的两种多残留方法的开发与比较

Development and comparison of two multi-residue methods for the analysis of select pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

作者信息

Li Yuanbo, Kelley Rebecca A, Anderson Troy D, Lydy Michael J

机构信息

Center for Fisheries, Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences, Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, 171 Life Science II, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA.

Department of Entomology and Fralin Life Science Institute, Virginia Tech, 216 Price Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.

出版信息

Talanta. 2015 Aug 1;140:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.03.031. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

Abstract

One of the hypotheses that may help explain the loss of honey bee colonies worldwide is the increasing potential for exposure of honey bees to complex mixtures of pesticides. To better understand this phenomenon, two multi-residue methods based on different extraction and cleanup procedures have been developed, and compared for the determination of 11 relevant pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry. Sample preparatory methods included solvent extraction followed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) cleanup and cleanup using a dispersive solid-phase extraction with zirconium-based sorbents (Z-Sep). Matrix effects, method detection limits, recoveries, and reproducibility were evaluated and compared. Method detection limits (MDL) of the pesticides for the GPC method in honey bees, pollen, and wax ranged from 0.65 to 5.92 ng/g dw, 0.56 to 6.61 ng/g dw, and 0.40 to 8.30 ng/g dw, respectively, while MDLs for the Z-Sep method were from 0.33 to 4.47 ng/g dw, 0.42 to 5.37 ng/g dw, and 0.51 to 5.34 ng/g dw, respectively. The mean recoveries in all matrices and at three spiking concentrations ranged from 64.4% to 149.5% and 71.9% to 126.2% for the GPC and Z-Sep methods, with relative standard deviation between 1.5-25.3% and 1.3-15.9%, respectively. The results showed that the Z-Sep method was more suitable for the determination of the target pesticides, especially chlorothalonil, in bee hive samples. The Z-Sep method was then validated using a series of field-collected bee hive samples taken from honey bee colonies in Virginia.

摘要

可能有助于解释全球蜜蜂蜂群损失的假说之一是,蜜蜂接触农药复杂混合物的可能性日益增加。为了更好地理解这一现象,已开发出两种基于不同提取和净化程序的多残留方法,并通过气相色谱-四极杆质谱法对蜜蜂、花粉和蜂蜡中11种相关农药的测定进行了比较。样品制备方法包括溶剂萃取,随后进行凝胶渗透色谱(GPC)净化,以及使用基于锆的吸附剂(Z-Sep)的分散固相萃取进行净化。评估并比较了基质效应、方法检测限、回收率和重现性。GPC方法在蜜蜂、花粉和蜂蜡中农药的方法检测限(MDL)分别为0.65至5.92 ng/g干重、0.56至6.61 ng/g干重和0.40至8.30 ng/g干重,而Z-Sep方法的MDL分别为0.33至4.47 ng/g干重、0.42至5.37 ng/g干重和0.51至5.34 ng/g干重。对于GPC和Z-Sep方法,在所有基质和三个加标浓度下的平均回收率分别为64.4%至149.5%和71.9%至126.2%,相对标准偏差分别为1.5 - 25.3%和1.3 - 15.9%。结果表明,Z-Sep方法更适合测定蜂箱样品中的目标农药,尤其是百菌清。然后使用从弗吉尼亚州蜜蜂蜂群采集的一系列现场蜂箱样品对Z-Sep方法进行了验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验