Nguyen Jennifer L, Dockery Douglas W
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W. 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Department of Environmental Health, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Int J Biometeorol. 2016 Feb;60(2):221-9. doi: 10.1007/s00484-015-1019-5. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
The health consequences of heat and cold are usually evaluated based on associations with outdoor measurements collected at a nearby weather reporting station. However, people in the developed world spend little time outdoors, especially during extreme temperature events. We examined the association between indoor and outdoor temperature and humidity in a range of climates. We measured indoor temperature, apparent temperature, relative humidity, dew point, and specific humidity (a measure of moisture content in air) for one calendar year (2012) in a convenience sample of eight diverse locations ranging from the equatorial region (10 °N) to the Arctic (64 °N). We then compared the indoor conditions to outdoor values recorded at the nearest airport weather station. We found that the shape of the indoor-to-outdoor temperature and humidity relationships varied across seasons and locations. Indoor temperatures showed little variation across season and location. There was large variation in indoor relative humidity between seasons and between locations which was independent of outdoor airport measurements. On the other hand, indoor specific humidity, and to a lesser extent dew point, tracked with outdoor, airport measurements both seasonally and between climates, across a wide range of outdoor temperatures. These results suggest that, in general, outdoor measures of actual moisture content in air better capture indoor conditions than outdoor temperature and relative humidity. Therefore, in studies where water vapor is among the parameters of interest for examining weather-related health effects, outdoor measurements of actual moisture content can be more reliably used as a proxy for indoor exposure than the more commonly examined variables of temperature and relative humidity.
高温和低温对健康的影响通常是根据与附近气象报告站收集的室外测量数据之间的关联来评估的。然而,发达国家的人们很少在户外活动,尤其是在极端温度事件期间。我们研究了一系列气候条件下室内外温度和湿度之间的关联。我们在一个便利样本中测量了从赤道地区(北纬10°)到北极地区(北纬64°)的八个不同地点在2012年一整年的室内温度、体感温度、相对湿度、露点和比湿(空气中水分含量的一种度量)。然后,我们将室内条件与最近的机场气象站记录的室外值进行了比较。我们发现,室内外温度和湿度关系的形状随季节和地点而变化。室内温度在季节和地点之间变化不大。室内相对湿度在季节之间和地点之间存在很大差异,且与机场室外测量值无关。另一方面,室内比湿以及程度稍低的露点,在广泛的室外温度范围内,在季节和不同气候之间都与机场室外测量值相关。这些结果表明,一般来说,空气中实际水分含量的室外测量值比室外温度和相对湿度能更好地反映室内条件。因此,在研究水蒸气是检查与天气相关的健康影响的感兴趣参数之一时,与更常被检测的温度和相对湿度变量相比,空气中实际水分含量的室外测量值可以更可靠地用作室内暴露的替代指标。