Weschler C J, Shields H C, Naik D V
JAPCA. 1989 Dec;39(12):1562-8. doi: 10.1080/08940630.1989.10466650.
Indoor and outdoor ozone concentrations were measured from late May through October at three office buildings with very different ventilation rates. The indoor values closely tracked the outdoor values, and, depending on the ventilation rate, were 20 to 80 percent of those outdoors. The indoor/outdoor data are adequately described with a mass balance model. The model can also be coupled with reported air exchange rates to estimate indoor/outdoor ratios for other structures. The results from this and previous studies indicate that indoor concentrations are frequently a significant fraction of outdoor values. These observations, and the fact that most people spend greater than 90 percent of their time indoors, indicate that indoor ozone exposure (concentration X time) is greater than outdoor exposure for many people. Relatively inexpensive strategies exist to reduce indoor ozone levels, and these could be implemented to reduce the public's total ozone exposure.
从五月下旬到十月,在三座通风率差异很大的办公楼中测量了室内和室外的臭氧浓度。室内值与室外值密切相关,根据通风率的不同,室内值为室外值的20%至80%。室内/室外数据可以用质量平衡模型进行充分描述。该模型还可以与报告的空气交换率相结合,以估计其他建筑物的室内/室外比率。这项研究以及之前的研究结果表明,室内浓度通常是室外值的很大一部分。这些观察结果,以及大多数人90%以上的时间都在室内度过这一事实,表明对于许多人来说,室内臭氧暴露(浓度×时间)大于室外暴露。存在一些相对廉价的策略来降低室内臭氧水平,可以实施这些策略以减少公众的总臭氧暴露。