• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Community Research Scholars Initiative: A Mid-Project Assessment.社区研究学者倡议:项目中期评估
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Aug;8(4):341-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12286. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
2
Increasing research capacity in community organizations: Findings from the Community Research Scholars Initiative.提高社区组织的研究能力:社区研究学者计划的研究结果。
Eval Program Plann. 2023 Feb;96:102189. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102189. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
3
Training partnership dyads for community-based participatory research: strategies and lessons learned from the Community Engaged Scholars Program.基于社区的参与式研究的培训伙伴关系二元组:从社区参与学者项目中学到的策略与经验教训。
Health Promot Pract. 2013 Jul;14(4):524-33. doi: 10.1177/1524839912461273. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
4
Partnership Among Peers: Lessons Learned From the Development of a Community Organization-Academic Research Training Program.同伴间的合作关系:从一个社区组织-学术研究培训项目的发展中汲取的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):461-470. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0052.
5
The community leaders institute: an innovative program to train community leaders in health research.社区领导学院:一个培训社区健康研究领导者的创新项目。
Acad Med. 2013 Mar;88(3):335-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318280d8de.
6
Practical Tips for Establishing Partnerships With Academic Researchers: A Resource Guide for Community-Based Organizations.与学术研究人员建立合作关系的实用技巧:社区组织资源指南。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):203-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0042.
7
Bridging the divide: building infrastructure to support community-academic partnerships and improve capacity to conduct patient-centered outcomes research.弥合差距:构建基础设施以支持社区 - 学术伙伴关系并提高开展以患者为中心的结局研究的能力。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):773-782. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0487-z.
8
Incorporating Community Engagement in Primary Care Research Training: Eleven-Year Outcomes.将社区参与纳入初级保健研究培训:十一年的结果。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):63-74. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0009.
9
The Community Leadership Institute of Kentucky (CLIK): A Collaborative Workforce and Leadership Development Program.肯塔基社区领导力学院(CLIK):一个协作型劳动力和领导力发展项目。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(1):95-105. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0009.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Early-stage investigators' experiences with an National Institutes of Health Pilot Award Program.早期研究者参与美国国立卫生研究院试点奖励计划的经历。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 10;9(1):e29. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.2. eCollection 2025.
2
"They should've talked to us more": lay health advisors' experiences with community-engaged hypertension research.“他们本应多和我们交流”:非专业健康顾问参与社区高血压研究的经历
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 25;10(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00544-8.
3
Increasing research capacity in community organizations: Findings from the Community Research Scholars Initiative.提高社区组织的研究能力:社区研究学者计划的研究结果。
Eval Program Plann. 2023 Feb;96:102189. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102189. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The community leaders institute: an innovative program to train community leaders in health research.社区领导学院:一个培训社区健康研究领导者的创新项目。
Acad Med. 2013 Mar;88(3):335-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318280d8de.
2
Survival of the fittest: capacity building for small nonprofit organizations.适者生存:小型非营利组织的能力建设
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Aug;34(3):236-45. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
3
A measure of community members' perceptions of the impacts of research partnerships in health and social services.衡量社区成员对健康与社会服务领域研究伙伴关系影响的认知程度。
Eval Program Plann. 2009 Aug;32(3):289-99. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
4
Evaluation of a research mentorship program in community care.社区护理中一项研究指导计划的评估
Eval Program Plann. 2008 Feb;31(1):22-33. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
5
Key considerations for logic model development in research partnerships: a Canadian case study.研究合作中逻辑模型开发的关键考量因素:一项加拿大案例研究。
Eval Program Plann. 2007 May;30(2):115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.01.002. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
6
Community-institutional partnerships: understanding trust among partners.社区-机构伙伴关系:理解伙伴之间的信任
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Apr;36(2):334-47. doi: 10.1177/1090198107305079. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
7
Collaboration: aligning resources to create and sustain partnerships.合作:整合资源以建立并维持伙伴关系。
J Prof Nurs. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):310-22. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.07.009.
8
Beyond tradition: synergizing intellectual and material capital to forge the new academic-service partnership.
J Prof Nurs. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.07.007.

社区研究学者倡议:项目中期评估

The Community Research Scholars Initiative: A Mid-Project Assessment.

作者信息

Theurer Jacqueline, Pike Earl, Sehgal Ashwini R, Fischer Robert L, Collins Cyleste

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Center for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Aug;8(4):341-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12286. Epub 2015 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1111/cts.12286
PMID:26073663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4553124/
Abstract

Community organizations addressing health and human service needs generally have minimal capacity for research and evaluation. As a result, they are often inadequately equipped to independently carry out activities that can be critical for their own success, such as conducting needs assessments, identifying best practices, and evaluating outcomes. Moreover, they are unable to develop equitable partnerships with academic researchers to conduct community-based research. This paper reports on the progress of the Community Research Scholar Initiative (CRSI), a program that aims to enhance community research and evaluation capacity through training of selected employees from Greater Cleveland community organizations. The intensive 2-year CRSI program includes didactic instruction, fieldwork, multiple levels of community and academic engagement, leadership training, and a mentored research project. The first cohort of CRSI Scholars, their community organizations, and other community stakeholders have incorporated program lessons into their practices and operations. The CRSI program evaluation indicates: the importance of careful Scholar selection; the need to engage executive leadership from Scholar organizations; the value of a curriculum integrating classwork, fieldwork, and community engagement; and the need for continual scholar skill and knowledge assessment. These findings and lessons learned guide other efforts to enhance community organization research and evaluation capacity.

摘要

致力于满足健康和人类服务需求的社区组织,其研究和评估能力通常极为有限。因此,它们往往缺乏足够的条件来独立开展对自身成功至关重要的活动,比如进行需求评估、确定最佳实践方法以及评估成果。此外,它们无法与学术研究人员建立公平的伙伴关系以开展基于社区的研究。本文报告了社区研究学者倡议(CRSI)的进展情况,该项目旨在通过培训大克利夫兰地区社区组织的选定员工来提高社区研究和评估能力。为期两年的CRSI强化项目包括课堂教学、实地考察、多层次的社区和学术参与、领导力培训以及一个有导师指导的研究项目。CRSI学者的第一批学员、他们所在的社区组织以及其他社区利益相关者已将项目经验融入到他们的实践和运营中。CRSI项目评估表明:谨慎挑选学者的重要性;需要让学者所在组织的高层领导参与进来;将课堂学习、实地考察和社区参与相结合的课程的价值;以及持续评估学者技能和知识的必要性。这些发现和经验教训为其他旨在提高社区组织研究和评估能力的努力提供了指导。