Henry James A, Griest Susan, Thielman Emily, McMillan Garnett, Kaelin Christine, Carlson Kathleen F
VA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
VA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Hear Res. 2016 Apr;334:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
The Tinnitus Research Consortium (TRC) issued a Request for Proposals in 2003 to develop a new tinnitus outcome measure that would: (1) be highly sensitive to treatment effects (validated for "responsiveness"); (2) address all major dimensions of tinnitus impact; and (3) be validated for scaling the negative impact of tinnitus. A grant was received by M. Meikle to conduct the study. In that observational study, all of the TRC objectives were met, with the final 25-item Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) containing eight subscales. The study was published in 2012, and since then the TFI has received increasing international use and is being translated into at least 14 languages. The present study utilized data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that involved testing the efficacy of "telephone tinnitus education" as intervention for bothersome tinnitus. These data were used to confirm results from the original TFI study. Overall, the TFI performed well in the RCT with Cohen's d being 1.23. There were large differences between the eight different subscales, ranging from a mean 13.2-point reduction (for the Auditory subscale) to a mean 26.7-point reduction (for the Relaxation subscale). Comparison of TFI performance was made with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. All of the results confirmed sensitivity of the TFI along with its subscales. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled
耳鸣研究联盟(TRC)于2003年发布了一份提案征集书,旨在开发一种新的耳鸣疗效评估指标,该指标应:(1)对治疗效果高度敏感(经过“反应性”验证);(2)涵盖耳鸣影响的所有主要方面;(3)经过验证可用于衡量耳鸣的负面影响程度。M. 米克尔获得了一项资助以开展该研究。在那项观察性研究中,TRC的所有目标均得以实现,最终的25项耳鸣功能指数(TFI)包含八个子量表。该研究于2012年发表,自那时起,TFI在国际上的使用越来越广泛,并且正在被翻译成至少14种语言。本研究利用了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,该试验涉及测试“电话耳鸣教育”作为治疗烦人的耳鸣的干预措施的疗效。这些数据用于证实原始TFI研究的结果。总体而言,TFI在RCT中表现良好,科恩d值为1.23。八个不同子量表之间存在很大差异,从平均降低13.2分(听觉子量表)到平均降低26.7分(放松子量表)。将TFI的表现与耳鸣障碍量表进行了比较。所有结果均证实了TFI及其子量表的敏感性。本文是名为《耳鸣》的特刊的一部分。